Paper · 2024 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of different microbial inoculants on morphological and fruit characteristics of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) cv. winter dawn

GURPREM SINGH; CHETAK BISHNOI; NAVPREM SINGH; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

In the rhizosphere, plants interact with a wide range of microorganisms that play crucial role in several aspects of plant development and defence against biotic and abiotic stresses. The present study was carried out during 2022–23 at Regional Research Station (Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana), Bathinda, Punjab to elucidate the role of various microbial inoculants on vegetative growth, yield, and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). The results depicted that, strawberry plants treated with Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortium (T10) was found best over the control in terms of morphological characteristics, viz. plant height, spread, leaf area, number of leaves, crown diameter, and root characteristics of plant. Fruit characteristics like fruit weight, fruit length, and fruit diameter were improved by inoculating the plants with Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortium. The cumulative marketable yield of both strawberry cultivar winter dawn was enhanced by inoculating the plant with different microbial inoculants but found maximum in Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four component consortium improved strawberry height, spread and leaf area over control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortium (T10)e0
Interactor
Burkholderia seminalisBurkholderia seminalise0symbiont
Second interactor
Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaStenotrophomonas maltophiliae0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, spread, leaf areae0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia · Second interactorRiraq25 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry plants treated with Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortium (T10) was found best over the control in terms of morphological characteristics, viz. plant height, spread, leaf area, number of leaves, crown diameter, and root characteristics of plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortium improved leaf number, crown diameter and root characteristics over control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortium (T10)e0
Interactor
Burkholderia seminalisBurkholderia seminalise0symbiont
Second interactor
Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaStenotrophomonas maltophiliae0symbiont
Outcome
number of leaves, crown diameter, and root characteristicse0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia · Second interactorRiraq25 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry plants treated with Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortium (T10) was found best over the control in terms of morphological characteristics, viz. plant height, spread, leaf area, number of leaves, crown diameter, and root characteristics of plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortium improved fruit weight, length and diameter.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
inoculating the plants with Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortiume0
Interactor
Burkholderia seminalisBurkholderia seminalise0symbiont
Second interactor
Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaStenotrophomonas maltophiliae0symbiont
Outcome
fruit weight, fruit length, and fruit diametere0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia · Second interactorRiraq25 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit characteristics like fruit weight, fruit length, and fruit diameter were improved by inoculating the plants with Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculants enhanced cumulative marketable yield of winter dawn strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
winter dawne0
Treatment
different microbial inoculantse0
Outcome
cumulative marketable yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cumulative marketable yield of both strawberry cultivar winter dawn was enhanced by inoculating the plant with different microbial inoculants but found maximum in Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four component consortium gave the maximum cumulative marketable yield.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
winter dawne0
Treatment
Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortiume0
Interactor
Burkholderia seminalisBurkholderia seminalise0symbiont
Second interactor
Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaStenotrophomonas maltophiliae0symbiont
Outcome
cumulative marketable yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
different microbial inoculantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia · Second interactorRiraq25 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cumulative marketable yield of both strawberry cultivar winter dawn was enhanced by inoculating the plant with different microbial inoculants but found maximum in Burkholderia seminalis + Stenotrophomonas maltophilia + VAM + PAU consortium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1219 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

inoculation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

67 papers: 60 positive, 7 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.