Paper · 2024 · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology

Evaluation of Crop Establishment Methods and Nano Urea Versus Conventional Urea on Growth Indices in Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)

Kamaran Azam; A.K. Singh; Vikash Singh; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate Crop Establishment Methods and Nano Urea Versus Conventional Urea on Growth Indices in Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.). Method of crop establishment influences the performance of rice through its effect on growth and development. Although, system of rice intensification has been reported to be the best establishment method. In traditional fertilizers, there is a huge loss of fertilizers by various manners like drift, leaching, runoff, microbial degradation, hydrolysis and photolysis. Bio accessibility of nutrients to plant is much lower relative to the rate of conventional fertilizers applied. The experiment was conducted during two consecutive seasons of Kharif 2022 and 2023 at the Agronomy Research Farm, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya (U.P.), India. The nitrogen level had significantly affected on crop growth rate, relative growth rate and net assimilation rate at all the stages of crop growth during both the years of investigations. The maximum Net assimilation rate at 30-60 and 60-90 DAS/DAT and crop growth rate, relative growth rate at 30-60, 60-90 and 90 to harvest DAS/DAT was recorded under 60% RDN through conventional Urea + 40% RDN through Nano Urea which was at par with 40% RDN through conventional Urea + 60% RDN through Nano Urea treatment, while significant over rest of the treatment during both the years of investigations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level significantly affected rice crop growth rate, relative growth rate and net assimilation rate at all growth stages in both seasons.

Taxon
Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
nitrogen levele2
Outcome
crop growth rate, relative growth rate and net assimilation ratee2
Setting
Agronomy Research Farm, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya (U.P.), Indiae1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth Indices in Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“conducted during two consecutive seasons of Kharif 2022 and 2023 at the Agronomy Research Farm, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya (U.P.), India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–842 · show in text ↑
e2

“The nitrogen level had significantly affected on crop growth rate, relative growth rate and net assimilation rate at all the stages of crop growth during both the years of investigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% RDN conventional urea plus 40% RDN nano urea combination gave the maximum net assimilation rate, significantly over the other treatments.

Taxon
Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
60% RDN through conventional Urea + 40% RDN through Nano Ureae3
Outcome
Net assimilation ratee3
Direction
maximume3
Qualifier
during both the years of investigationse3
Comparator
rest of the treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth Indices in Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–150 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum Net assimilation rate at 30-60 and 60-90 DAS/DAT and crop growth rate, relative growth rate at 30-60, 60-90 and 90 to harvest DAS/DAT was recorded under 60% RDN through conventional Urea + 40% RDN through Nano Urea which was at par with 40% RDN through conventional Urea + 60% RDN through Nano Urea treatment, while significant over rest of the treatment during both the years of investigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% RDN conventional urea plus 40% RDN nano urea combination gave higher crop growth rate and relative growth rate at 30-60, 60-90 and 90-harvest DAS/DAT.

Taxon
Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
60% RDN through conventional Urea + 40% RDN through Nano Ureae3
Outcome
crop growth rate, relative growth ratee3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Qualifier
during both the years of investigationse3
Comparator
rest of the treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth Indices in Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–150 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum Net assimilation rate at 30-60 and 60-90 DAS/DAT and crop growth rate, relative growth rate at 30-60, 60-90 and 90 to harvest DAS/DAT was recorded under 60% RDN through conventional Urea + 40% RDN through Nano Urea which was at par with 40% RDN through conventional Urea + 60% RDN through Nano Urea treatment, while significant over rest of the treatment during both the years of investigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% RDN conventional urea plus 40% RDN nano urea combination was at par with the 40% plus 60% combination for net assimilation rate.

Taxon
Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
60% RDN through conventional Urea + 40% RDN through Nano Ureae3
Outcome
Net assimilation ratee3
Direction
at pare3
Comparator
40% RDN through conventional Urea + 60% RDN through Nano Ureae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth Indices in Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–150 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum Net assimilation rate at 30-60 and 60-90 DAS/DAT and crop growth rate, relative growth rate at 30-60, 60-90 and 90 to harvest DAS/DAT was recorded under 60% RDN through conventional Urea + 40% RDN through Nano Urea which was at par with 40% RDN through conventional Urea + 60% RDN through Nano Urea treatment, while significant over rest of the treatment during both the years of investigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1438 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 132 positive, 12 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.