Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Response of mulberry cuttings to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation under controlled conditions

Nadiya Mushtaq; MF Baqual; ZA Baba; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Mycorrhizal association with the plants has always proved to influence crop growth in a big way through increased availability of nutrients particularly phosphorus to them. Isolation of native AM fungi, their multiplication and re-inoculation in growing medium has further boosted the growth of various agricultural crops. Mulberry a plant from family Moraceae has been exploited for rearing of silkworm larvae by feeding them with its foliage. The other parts of plant are also being used for their economic importance and farmer friendly utility. The cuttings of mulberry plant were inoculated with native AM fungi and various growth parameters under polyhouse were observed to have significant impact upon them with increased quantitative parameters.Mean sprouting percentage of inoculated cuttings recorded by mid-April was 2.85% higher than un-inoculated cuttings where it was only 2.10%. The mean percentage increase from mid-April to ending May was observed to be 28.26% and in un-inoculated cuttings it was 20.41% and the mean pair difference between the two was 7.85%. There was also significant increase in the mean of survival by 9.70% between inoculated and un-inoculated cuttings. Similarly, the pair differences recorded for other growth parameters were: number of leaves per sapling, 1.35%; leaf area, 3.45 cm²; fresh leaf weight per sapling, 1.15 g; dry leaf weight per sapling, 0.76 g; number of roots, 0.95; length of the longest root, 2.06 cm; total root length, 9.85 cm; root biomass, 0.23 g; and root volume, 0.06 cm³. Overall, it was observed that the cuttings inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi indicated increased growth parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated mulberry cuttings had 2.85% higher sprouting than uninoculated cuttings at mid-April.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculated with native AM fungie0
Interactor
native AM fungie0symbiont
Outcome
sprouting percentagee1
Direction
highere1
Value
2.85%e1
Comparator
un-inoculated cuttingse1

Verbatim

e0

“The cuttings of mulberry plant were inoculated with native AM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean sprouting percentage of inoculated cuttings recorded by mid-April was 2.85% higher than un-inoculated cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sprouting increase from mid-April to late May was 28.26% for inoculated cuttings versus 20.41% for uninoculated cuttings, a 7.85% difference.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculated with native AM fungie0
Interactor
native AM fungie0symbiont
Outcome
mean percentage increasee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
7.85%e1
Qualifier
28.26% and in un-inoculated cuttings it was 20.41%e1
Comparator
un-inoculated cuttingse1

Verbatim

e0

“The cuttings of mulberry plant were inoculated with native AM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean percentage increase from mid-April to ending May was observed to be 28.26% and in un-inoculated cuttings it was 20.41% and the mean pair difference between the two was 7.85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased mean survival by 9.70%.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculated with native AM fungie0
Interactor
native AM fungie0symbiont
Outcome
mean of survivale1
Direction
increasee1
Value
9.70%e1
Comparator
un-inoculated cuttingse1

Verbatim

e0

“The cuttings of mulberry plant were inoculated with native AM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant increase in the mean of survival by 9.70% between inoculated and un-inoculated cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1192 · show in text ↑

inoculation · survival · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · survival · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.