Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The sprouting increase from mid-April to late May was 28.26% for inoculated cuttings versus 20.41% for uninoculated cuttings, a 7.85% difference.

A claim from Response of mulberry cuttings to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation under controlled conditions · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sprouting increase from mid-April to late May was 28.26% for inoculated cuttings versus 20.41% for uninoculated cuttings, a 7.85% difference.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculated with native AM fungie0
Interactor
native AM fungie0symbiont
Outcome
mean percentage increasee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
7.85%e1
Qualifier
28.26% and in un-inoculated cuttings it was 20.41%e1
Comparator
un-inoculated cuttingse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Verbatim

e0

“The cuttings of mulberry plant were inoculated with native AM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–616
e1

“The mean percentage increase from mid-April to ending May was observed to be 28.26% and in un-inoculated cuttings it was 20.41% and the mean pair difference between the two was 7.85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1076

Title

Response of mulberry cuttings to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation under controlled conditions

Nadiya Mushtaq; MF Baqual; ZA Baba; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i6d.873

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e2b1cf641a61ddaeba9bb597e7ca2527f069dc36b878eceaeb89d478f977a5ef · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer