Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Influence of NPK and poultry manure on physico-chemical properties of soil in cowpea

Kuldeep Singh Solanki; Ram Bharose; Tarence Thomas; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The research was lead at the Soil Science Research Farm, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, U.P. during the Rabi season in 2023-2024. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with eighteen treatments and three replications with four levels of NPK and poultry manure and one level of rhizobium respectively that leads to the Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium (kg ha-1), OC%,% pore space and water holding capacity (%) of soil after crop harvest was found significant except on bulk density (Mg m-3), particle density (Mg m-3), pH and EC (dSm-1) of soil after harvest. The treatment T16 (@ 105% NPK + @ 30% Poultry Manure + Rhizobium Inoculation) in soil have significant findings which comprises yellowish brown and sandy loam textured neutral to alkaline soil that is non- saline in nature. Physico-chemical properties of soil was found best in treatment T16 (@ 105% NPK + @ 30% Poultry Manure + Rhizobium Inoculation) as compare with in treatment T1 (@ 0% NPK + @ 0% Poultry Manure + Rhizobium Inoculation).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK and poultry manure treatments significantly affected soil nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium after harvest.

Treatment
NPK and poultry manuree3
Outcome
Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium (kg ha-1)e1
Setting
Prayagraj, U.P.e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soil in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Prayagraj, U.P. during the Rabi season in 2023-2024”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–177 · show in text ↑
e3

“four levels of NPK and poultry manure and one level of rhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–351 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium (kg ha-1), OC%,% pore space and water holding capacity (%) of soil after crop harvest was found significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK and poultry manure treatments significantly affected organic carbon, pore space and water holding capacity of soil after harvest.

Treatment
NPK and poultry manuree3
Outcome
OC%,% pore space and water holding capacity (%)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soil in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“four levels of NPK and poultry manure and one level of rhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–351 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium (kg ha-1), OC%,% pore space and water holding capacity (%) of soil after crop harvest was found significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk density, particle density and pH of soil were not significantly affected by the treatments after harvest.

Outcome
bulk density (Mg m-3), particle density (Mg m-3), pHe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soil in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 · show in text ↑
e2

“except on bulk density (Mg m-3), particle density (Mg m-3), pH and EC (dSm-1) of soil after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrical conductivity of soil was not significantly affected by the treatments after harvest.

Outcome
EC (dSm-1)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soil in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 · show in text ↑
e2

“except on bulk density (Mg m-3), particle density (Mg m-3), pH and EC (dSm-1) of soil after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T16 (105% NPK, 30% poultry manure and rhizobium) gave the best soil physico-chemical properties compared with T1 (no fertilizer or manure).

Treatment
T16 (@ 105% NPK + @ 30% Poultry Manure + Rhizobium Inoculation)e4
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume4symbiont
Outcome
Physico-chemical properties of soile4
Direction
beste4
Comparator
T1 (@ 0% NPK + @ 0% Poultry Manure + Rhizobium Inoculation)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soil in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“Physico-chemical properties of soil was found best in treatment T16 (@ 105% NPK + @ 30% Poultry Manure + Rhizobium Inoculation) as compare with in treatment T1 (@ 0% NPK + @ 0% Poultry Manure + Rhizobium Inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1067 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil under treatment T16 was yellowish brown, sandy loam textured, neutral to alkaline and non-saline.

Outcome
sandy loam textured neutral to alkaline soile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soil in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 · show in text ↑
e5

“The treatment T16 (@ 105% NPK + @ 30% Poultry Manure + Rhizobium Inoculation) in soil have significant findings which comprises yellowish brown and sandy loam textured neutral to alkaline soil that is non- saline in nature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–849 · show in text ↑