Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of nano-multi micronutrients on growth, quality and economics of French bean

P.K. Maurya; Vijay Bahadur; P.K. Shukla; et al.

3
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Micronutrients plays a vital role in enzymatic activity in plants and thus have influential role in growth and superiority of fruit. The research was carried out at SHUATS, Prayagraj during the Rabi season of 2021 and 2022. The research was conducted with aim to study the effect of nano mixed micronutrients on growth, quality, and economics of French bean variety “Arka Komal”. The experiment was set up using a FRBD one factor being application of nano mixed micronutrients and other being application of nano fertilizers. The nano mixed micronutrients given were M0-control; M1- 0.2ml/ L of nano mix micronutrient/L of water as foliar application; M2- 0.4ml/L of nano mix micronutrient/ L of water as foliar application; M3 -0.6ml/ L of nano mix micronutrient/L of water as foliar application. The nano-fertilizers treatment given were F0– Control (without fertilizer); F1- 100% RDF as traditional fertilizer; F2-5ml/ L each of Nano NPK/ L of water as foliar application; F3- 4ml/L each of Nano NPK/ L of water as foliar application; F4- 3ml/L each of Nano NPK/ L of water as foliar application. 50% traditional fertilizers were applied in all treatments excluding control. From above experimental findings it was concluded that treatment M3 performed best for growth parameters like plant height; leaf area and pod yield per hectare studied in French bean. M3 performed best for quality parameters like TSS; ascorbic acid content. It also had highest BC ratio (3.07) among various treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M3 performed best for French bean plant height, leaf area and pod yield per hectare.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Material
Arka Komale3
Treatment
M3 -0.6ml/ L of nano mix micronutrient/L of water as foliar applicatione1
Outcome
plant height; leaf area and pod yield per hectaree0
Direction
beste0
Setting
SHUATS, Prayagraje2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment M3 performed best for growth parameters like plant height; leaf area and pod yield per hectare studied in French bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1360 · show in text ↑
e1

“M3 -0.6ml/ L of nano mix micronutrient/L of water as foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–796 · show in text ↑
e2

“at SHUATS, Prayagraj”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–182 · show in text ↑
e3

“French bean variety “Arka Komal””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M3 performed best for French bean TSS and ascorbic acid content.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
Material
Arka Komale2
Treatment
M3 -0.6ml/ L of nano mix micronutrient/L of water as foliar applicatione1
Outcome
TSS; ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
beste0
Setting
SHUATS, Prayagraje3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M3 performed best for quality parameters like TSS; ascorbic acid content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1435 · show in text ↑
e1

“M3 -0.6ml/ L of nano mix micronutrient/L of water as foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–796 · show in text ↑
e2

“French bean variety “Arka Komal””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–378 · show in text ↑
e3

“at SHUATS, Prayagraj”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M3 had the highest benefit-cost ratio, 3.07, among treatments.

Treatment
M3 -0.6ml/ L of nano mix micronutrient/L of water as foliar applicatione1
Outcome
BC ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.07e0
Comparator
various treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“It also had highest BC ratio (3.07) among various treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1497 · show in text ↑
e1

“M3 -0.6ml/ L of nano mix micronutrient/L of water as foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–796 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

application · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.