Paper · 1998 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE AND WATER REGIME ON PRODUCTION OF RICE

MOHAMED A. NOUR

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at the Rice Research and Training Center. Sakha, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt to study the effect of irri­gation intervals and the application of farm yard manure alone or in com­bination with nitrogen fertilizer on Giza 176 rice variety in 1995 and 1996. Irrigation intervals were 3, 6, 9 and 12 days. Urea N/ha rates were zero, 55 and 110 kg and farm yard manure rates were 9.5, 19, 28.5 ton/ha. Dry matter yield, tillers/m2 and plant height were meas­ured at four growth stages namely; mid tillering, maximum tillering, pani­cle initiation and maturity. Irrigation water used was measured with a cal­ibrated water meter. Results showed that, growth measurments were significantly re­duced due to the increase of irrigation intervals up to 12 days. Rice was most sensitive to water deficit during the stages of maximum tillering and panicle initiation than at mid tillering or maturity. Grain yield did not significantly differ when rice was irrigated every 3 or 6 days. However, yield decreased by less than 5% with irrigation every 6 days but about 17% of water consumption was saved. Nitrogen uptake and content were significantly reduced as irrigation interval increased over 3 days. However, water use efficiency was greatest with irrigation every 6 days. The use of chemical nitrogen fertilizer eith alone or combined with farm yard manure was superior to the use of farm yard manure alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth measurements were significantly reduced as irrigation intervals increased up to 12 days.

Treatment
irrigation intervalse2
Outcome
growth measurmentse2
Direction
re­ducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PRODUCTION OF RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth measurments were significantly re­duced due to the increase of irrigation intervals up to 12 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not significantly differ when rice was irrigated every 3 or 6 days.

Treatment
irrigated every 3 or 6 dayse3
Outcome
Grain yielde3
Direction
did not significantly differe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PRODUCTION OF RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yield did not significantly differ when rice was irrigated every 3 or 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decreased by less than 5% with irrigation every 6 days.

Treatment
irrigation every 6 dayse4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
less than 5%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PRODUCTION OF RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
e4

“yield decreased by less than 5% with irrigation every 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 17% of water consumption was saved with irrigation every 6 days.

Treatment
irrigation every 6 dayse4
Outcome
water consumptione5
Direction
savede5
Value
about 17%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PRODUCTION OF RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
e4

“yield decreased by less than 5% with irrigation every 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1072 · show in text ↑
e5

“about 17% of water consumption was saved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice was most sensitive to water deficit during maximum tillering and panicle initiation than at mid tillering or maturity.

Organ / stage
maximum tillering and panicle initiatione6
Treatment
water deficite6
Outcome
sensitive to water deficite6
Direction
most sensitivee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PRODUCTION OF RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
e6

“Rice was most sensitive to water deficit during the stages of maximum tillering and panicle initiation than at mid tillering or maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake and content were significantly reduced as irrigation interval increased over 3 days.

Treatment
irrigation intervale7
Outcome
Nitrogen uptake and contente7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PRODUCTION OF RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nitrogen uptake and content were significantly reduced as irrigation interval increased over 3 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was greatest with irrigation every 6 days.

Treatment
irrigation every 6 dayse1
Outcome
water use efficiencye1
Direction
greateste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PRODUCTION OF RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“water use efficiency was greatest with irrigation every 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical nitrogen fertilizer, alone or combined with farm yard manure, was superior to farm yard manure alone in rice.

Treatment
chemical nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
superiore2
Direction
superiore2
Comparator
farm yard manure alonee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PRODUCTION OF RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of chemical nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1332 · show in text ↑
e2

“was superior to the use of farm yard manure alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1427 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 119 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 119 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 222 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.