Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Enhancing lucerne (Medicago sativa) yield and nutritional quality: a meta-analysis of fertilization types and environmental factors in China

Jiachang Zhang; Yanting Mao; Gang Wang; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: ), is a cornerstone of China's livestock industry, however, due to the backward agronomic strategies and technology, lucerne in China faces cultivation challenges that result in lower productivity and quality than global standards. Therefore, we undertook a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of five distinct fertilization types on lucerne yield and nutritional quality in various locations in China. The fertilizer practices included manure application, combined mineral fertilizer and manure application (FM), biological fertilizer application, unbalanced application of two or more mineral fertilizer types, and balanced mineral fertilizer application. Furthermore, we investigate influential factors of yield and quality of lucerne under fertilization, including climatic variables (mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature), initial soil properties (soil organic carbon; total nitrogen, pH), and agronomic factors (seeding rate, harvest frequency, and lucerne stand age). Methods: Our study analyzed 53 published papers to discern the most beneficial fertilizer for enhancing lucerne yield and nutritional quality. Results and discussion: The results showed that the fertilizer practices, on average, significantly improved yield by 31.72% and crude protein content by 11.29%, with FM emerging as the most effective, this is because mineral fertilizers provide available nutrients for lucerne, manure provides essential organic matter for microorganisms and improve soil properties. In addition, the fertilizer practices significantly reduced neutral and acid detergent fiber contents by 6.28% and 8.50%, respectively, while increasing ash content and relative feeding value. Furthermore, climatic variables, soil properties, and planting system factors such as sowing date and harvest frequency significantly affected yield and nutritional quality. The practical implications of our results emphasize the need for balanced and strategic fertilizer application to optimize lucerne production and highlight the potential to adjust cultivation practices according to environmental conditions. Balanced and strategic fertilizer application can simultaneously improve soil properties, enhance soil carbon sequestration, and reduce the emission of greenhouse gases from the soil, which is a vital measure for realizing sustainable agricultural development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer practices raised lucerne yield by 31.72%.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
fertilizer practicese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
31.72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer practices, on average, significantly improved yield by 31.72%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer practices raised crude protein content by 11.29%.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
fertilizer practicese0
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
11.29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer practices, on average, significantly improved yield by 31.72% and crude protein content by 11.29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined mineral fertilizer and manure was the most effective practice.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
combined mineral fertilizer and manure applicatione1
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FM emerging as the most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1347 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined mineral fertilizer and manure application (FM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer practices reduced neutral detergent fiber content by 6.28%.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
fertilizer practicese0
Outcome
detergent fiber contentse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6.28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer practices significantly reduced neutral and acid detergent fiber contents by 6.28% and 8.50%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer practices reduced acid detergent fiber content by 8.50%.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
fertilizer practicese0
Outcome
acid detergent fiber contentse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer practices significantly reduced neutral and acid detergent fiber contents by 6.28% and 8.50%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer practices increased ash content and relative feeding value.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
fertilizer practicese1
Outcome
ash content and relative feeding valuee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while increasing ash content and relative feeding value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1706 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilizer practices significantly reduced neutral and acid detergent fiber contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1616 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Climate, soil and planting system factors significantly affected lucerne yield and nutritional quality.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Outcome
yield and nutritional qualitye0
Qualifier
soil properties, and planting system factors such as sowing date and harvest frequencye0
Setting
climatic variablese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“climatic variables, soil properties, and planting system factors such as sowing date and harvest frequency significantly affected yield and nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1880 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–35 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend balanced and strategic fertilization for lucerne production.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Outcome
balanced and strategic fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the need for balanced and strategic fertilizer application to optimize lucerne production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2023 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne (Medicago sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–35 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 151 positive, 33 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.