Paper · 2024 · Vegetable and Melon Growing

IN-STORAGE WEIGHT LOSS BY TABLE BEETROOTS DEPENDING ON THE ROOT PULP STRUCTURE

L. M. Puzik; V. K. Puzik; V. A. Bondarenko; et al.

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Purpose - to determine the in-storage weight loss by table beetroots depending on the root pulp structure. Methods. 1. General scientific: hypotheses – drawing up designs of experiments; experiments - conducting laboratory tests; analysis and synthesis – summarizing and concluding. 2. Computantional and analytical. Results. Beetroots naturally lose their weight during storage and this process is uneven. At the beginning, it is quite rapid, then it gradually slows down, accelerating in spring. Of the studied beet cultivars, the greatest losses of weight during storage were registered for cvs. 'Renova' and 'Tsylindra'. The weight loss by beetroots was correlated with a decrease in the dry matter content, which was spent on the respiration of beetroots to support their vital activity. In beet cvs. 'Renova' and 'Opolskyi', the decrease in the dry matter during storage was greater, amounting to 5.6 and 4.5%, respectively. There was a relationship between cell area and in-storage water evaporation. It was revealed that in cells with the largest area of 140.04·103 μm, the evaporation-caused losses amounted to 77.7% (cv. 'Karilon'), while in cells with the smallest area of 62.89·103 μm, this parameter was only 10.5% (cv. 'Opolskyi'). Conclusions. There was a direct strong correlation between water evaporation and cell size (r = 0.791). There was a significant second-order curvilinear dependence of beetroot weight loss on cultivars' features (R2 = 0.6041–0.9910).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beetroot weight loss was initially rapid, slowed, then accelerated in spring.

Taxon
Beetrootse0
Outcome
lose their weight during storagee0
Direction
slows down, accelerating in springe0

Verbatim

e0

“Beetroots naturally lose their weight during storage and this process is uneven. At the beginning, it is quite rapid, then it gradually slows down, accelerating in spring.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–497 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Renova had among the greatest storage weight losses.

Taxon
TABLE BEETROOTSt0
Material
'Renova'e0
Outcome
losses of weight during storagee0
Direction
greateste0

Verbatim

e0

“the greatest losses of weight during storage were registered for cvs. 'Renova' and 'Tsylindra'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“TABLE BEETROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tsylindra had among the greatest storage weight losses.

Taxon
TABLE BEETROOTSt0
Material
'Tsylindra'e0
Outcome
losses of weight during storagee0
Direction
greateste0

Verbatim

e0

“the greatest losses of weight during storage were registered for cvs. 'Renova' and 'Tsylindra'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“TABLE BEETROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight loss correlated with declining dry matter content.

Taxon
beetrootse0
Outcome
weight loss by beetrootse0
Qualifier
decrease in the dry matter contente0

Not reportedCompoundOrgan / stageDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The weight loss by beetroots was correlated with a decrease in the dry matter content, which was spent on the respiration of beetroots to support their vital activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–792 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter declined 5.6% in Renova.

Material
'Renova'e0
Outcome
decrease in the dry matter during storagee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
5.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In beet cvs. 'Renova' and 'Opolskyi', the decrease in the dry matter during storage was greater, amounting to 5.6 and 4.5%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–930 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter declined 4.5% in Opolskyi.

Material
'Opolskyi'e0
Outcome
decrease in the dry matter during storagee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
4.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In beet cvs. 'Renova' and 'Opolskyi', the decrease in the dry matter during storage was greater, amounting to 5.6 and 4.5%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–930 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karilon cells of the largest reported area had 77.7% evaporation-caused losses.

Taxon
TABLE BEETROOTSt0
Material
'Karilon'e0
Outcome
evaporation-caused lossese0
Value
77.7%e0
Qualifier
140.04·103 μme0

Verbatim

e0

“in cells with the largest area of 140.04·103 μm, the evaporation-caused losses amounted to 77.7% (cv. 'Karilon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“TABLE BEETROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Opolskyi cells of the smallest reported area had 10.5% evaporation-caused losses.

Taxon
TABLE BEETROOTSt0
Material
'Opolskyi'e0
Outcome
this parametere0
Value
10.5%e0
Qualifier
62.89·103 μme0

Verbatim

e0

“in cells with the smallest area of 62.89·103 μm, this parameter was only 10.5% (cv. 'Opolskyi')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“TABLE BEETROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water evaporation correlated strongly and directly with cell size.

Taxon
TABLE BEETROOTSt0
Organ / stage
celle0
Outcome
water evaporatione0
Direction
directe0
Value
r = 0.791e0

Verbatim

e0

“There was a direct strong correlation between water evaporation and cell size (r = 0.791).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“TABLE BEETROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar features had significant curvilinear dependence with beetroot weight loss.

Taxon
beetroote0
Material
cultivars' featurese0
Outcome
beetroot weight losse0
Value
R2 = 0.6041–0.9910e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant second-order curvilinear dependence of beetroot weight loss on cultivars' features (R2 = 0.6041–0.9910).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1478 · show in text ↑