Paper · 2024 · Physiologia Plantarum

Chitosan‐fulvic acid nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in maize via antioxidant defense and transcriptional reprogramming

Alexander Brown; Tiba Nazar Ibrahim Al‐Azawi; Nusrat Jahan Methela; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Nanoparticles are promising alternatives to synthetic fertilizers in the context of climate change and sustainable agriculture. Maize plants were grown under gradient concentrations (50 μM, 100 μM, 200 μM, 500 μM, and 1 mM) of chitosan (Ch), fulvic acid (FA) or chitosan‐fulvic acid nanoparticles (Ch‐FANPs). Based on the overall phenotypic assessment, 100 μM was selected for downstream experiments. Maize plants grown under this optimized concentration were thereafter subjected to drought stress by water withholding for 14 days. Compared to the individual performances, the combined treatment of Ch‐FANPs supported the best plant growth over chitosan, fulvic acid, or sole watered plants and alleviated the adverse effects of drought by enhancing root and shoot growth, and biomass by an average 20%. In addition, Ch‐FANPs‐treated plants exhibited a significant reduction in hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) content (~10%), with a concomitant increase in ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity (>100%) while showing a reduced lipid peroxidation level observed by the decrease in malondialdehyde (MDA) content (~100%) and low electrolyte leakage level. Furthermore, chlorophyll content increased significantly (>100%) in maize plants treated with Ch‐FANPs compared to Ch or FA and control in response to drought. The expression of drought‐induced transcription factors, ZmDREB1A , ZmbZIP1 , and ZmNAC28 , and the ABA‐dependent ZmCIPK3 was upregulated by Ch‐FANPs. Owing to the above, Ch‐FANPs are proposed as a growth‐promoting agent and elicitor of drought tolerance in maize via activation of antioxidant machinery and transcriptional reprogramming of drought‐related genes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 μM was selected as the best concentration for later maize experiments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
overall phenotypic assessmente0
Value
100 μMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the overall phenotypic assessment, 100 μM was selected for downstream experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–409 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, Ch-FANPs enhanced maize root and shoot growth and biomass by an average 20% compared with single components or watered plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Ch‐FANPse0
Outcome
root and shoot growth, and biomasse0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
droughte0
Comparator
chitosan, fulvic acid, or sole watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the individual performances, the combined treatment of Ch‐FANPs supported the best plant growth over chitosan, fulvic acid, or sole watered plants and alleviated the adverse effects of drought by enhancing root and shoot growth, and biomass by an average 20%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ch-FANPs significantly reduced hydrogen peroxide content by about 10%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Ch‐FANPse0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
~10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ch‐FANPs‐treated plants exhibited a significant reduction in hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) content (~10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ch-FANPs increased ascorbate peroxidase activity by more than 100%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Chitosan‐fulvic acid nanoparticlest0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
>100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity (>100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chitosan‐fulvic acid nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ch-FANPs reduced malondialdehyde content by about 100%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Chitosan‐fulvic acid nanoparticlest0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
~100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in malondialdehyde (MDA) content (~100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chitosan‐fulvic acid nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ch-FANPs produced low electrolyte leakage in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Chitosan‐fulvic acid nanoparticlest0
Outcome
electrolyte leakage levele0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low electrolyte leakage level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chitosan‐fulvic acid nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ch-FANPs significantly increased chlorophyll content by more than 100% compared with Ch, FA and control during drought.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Ch‐FANPse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
>100%e0
Qualifier
droughte0
Comparator
Ch or FA and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content increased significantly (>100%) in maize plants treated with Ch‐FANPs compared to Ch or FA and control in response to drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ch-FANPs upregulated ZmDREB1A, ZmbZIP1 and ZmNAC28 expression.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Ch‐FANPse0
Gene
ZmDREB1A , ZmbZIP1 , and ZmNAC28e0
Outcome
expression of drought‐induced transcription factorse0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of drought‐induced transcription factors, ZmDREB1A , ZmbZIP1 , and ZmNAC28 , and the ABA‐dependent ZmCIPK3 was upregulated by Ch‐FANPs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ch-FANPs upregulated expression of ABA-dependent ZmCIPK3.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Ch‐FANPse0
Gene
ZmCIPK3e0
Outcome
ZmCIPK3e0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ABA‐dependent ZmCIPK3 was upregulated by Ch‐FANPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose Ch-FANPs to promote maize growth and drought tolerance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Ch‐FANPse0
Outcome
growth‐promoting agent and elicitor of drought tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ch‐FANPs are proposed as a growth‐promoting agent and elicitor of drought tolerance in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1581 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.