Abstract
Abstract: For the propagation of guava seedlings to occur, it is necessary to address numerous factors, therefore, the objective was to verify the influence of the diameter and type of cut on the base of ‘Pedro Sato’ guava tree cuttings. Experiment I: implemented in a 3 × 5 factorial scheme, consisting of three types of cut at the base of the cutting and five biostimulant concentrations (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 g L-¹). Experiment II: implemented in a 2 × 5 factorial scheme, composed of two stem diameters (D1: 3 - 3,99 mm; D2: 4 - 4,99 mm) combined with five biostimulant concentrations (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 g L-¹), and both experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design, with 4 replicates of 10 cuttings per plot. Considering the above, it could be concluded that the use of biostimulant increases the rooting rate. Cut with the removal of lateral portions at the base of the cutting promotes greater mortality, while evidencing less increase in root length. In experiment II, it was found that cuttings with diameter between 4 and 4.99 mm show greater survival rate at concentrations of 0 and 5 g L-¹, while cuttings with diameter between 3 and 3.99 mm have higher rooting rate at concentrations 0 and 5 g L-¹ but with high mortality rate at concentration of 5 g L-¹.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant use increased the rooting rate of guava cuttings.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Material
- Pedro Satot0
- Treatment
- use of biostimulante1
- Outcome
- rooting ratee1
- Direction
- increasese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rooting of ‘Pedro Sato’ guava cuttings as a function of diameter, types of cuts and treatment with bioestimulant”
e1“it could be concluded that the use of biostimulant increases the rooting rate”
Claim · model-written summary
The cut with removal of lateral portions at the cutting base promoted greater mortality of guava cuttings.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Pedro Satot0
- Treatment
- Cut with the removal of lateral portions at the base of the cuttinge1
- Outcome
- mortalitye1
- Direction
- promotes greatere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rooting of ‘Pedro Sato’ guava cuttings as a function of diameter, types of cuts and treatment with bioestimulant”
e1“Cut with the removal of lateral portions at the base of the cutting promotes greater mortality, while evidencing less increase in root length”
Claim · model-written summary
The cut with removal of lateral portions at the cutting base gave less increase in root length in guava cuttings.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Pedro Satot0
- Treatment
- Cut with the removal of lateral portions at the base of the cuttinge1
- Outcome
- increase in root lengthe1
- Direction
- lesse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rooting of ‘Pedro Sato’ guava cuttings as a function of diameter, types of cuts and treatment with bioestimulant”
e1“Cut with the removal of lateral portions at the base of the cutting promotes greater mortality, while evidencing less increase in root length”
Claim · model-written summary
Cuttings with diameter 4 to 4.99 mm showed greater survival rate at 0 and 5 g L-¹ biostimulant.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cuttings with diameter between 4 and 4.99 mme1
- Outcome
- survival ratee1
- Direction
- greatere1
- Qualifier
- at concentrations of 0 and 5 g L-¹e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rooting of ‘Pedro Sato’ guava cuttings as a function of diameter, types of cuts and treatment with bioestimulant”
e1“cuttings with diameter between 4 and 4.99 mm show greater survival rate at concentrations of 0 and 5 g L-¹”
Claim · model-written summary
Cuttings with diameter 3 to 3.99 mm had higher rooting rate at 0 and 5 g L-¹ biostimulant.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cuttings with diameter between 3 and 3.99 mme1
- Outcome
- rooting ratee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Qualifier
- at concentrations 0 and 5 g L-¹e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rooting of ‘Pedro Sato’ guava cuttings as a function of diameter, types of cuts and treatment with bioestimulant”
e1“cuttings with diameter between 3 and 3.99 mm have higher rooting rate at concentrations 0 and 5 g L-¹ but with high mortality rate at concentration of 5 g L-¹”
Claim · model-written summary
Cuttings with diameter 3 to 3.99 mm had high mortality rate at 5 g L-¹ biostimulant.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cuttings with diameter between 3 and 3.99 mme1
- Outcome
- mortality ratee1
- Direction
- highe1
- Qualifier
- at concentration of 5 g L-¹e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rooting of ‘Pedro Sato’ guava cuttings as a function of diameter, types of cuts and treatment with bioestimulant”
e1“cuttings with diameter between 3 and 3.99 mm have higher rooting rate at concentrations 0 and 5 g L-¹ but with high mortality rate at concentration of 5 g L-¹”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · pest · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
pruning · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →other · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.