Paper · 2019 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Shoot pruning affect micropropagation of P. guajava L. and P. friedrichsthalianum (O. Berg) Nied.

Shashi Kala; Suneel Sharma

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present experiment has been designed in order to see the effect of pruning on explants collection and it's in vitro performance on shoot initiation, shoot multiplication and root initiation. For this purpose, two species of guava namely, Psidium guajava L. and P. friedrichsthalianum (O. Berg) Nied. (Chinese guava) were selected. Healthy shoots were pruned at 50% and 75% level along with the unpruned shoots (control). Nodal segments of new growth were used as explants. Best MS media along with plant growth hormones obtained in our previous work were used for culturing explants. Explants collected from pruned shoots (50% and 75%) gave better shoot regeneration and shoot multiplication over the unpruned (control) shoots in case of P. guajava L cv. L-49. The highest numbers of shoot regeneration (64.2%) were recorded in explants obtained from 50% pruned shoots of P. friedrichsthalianum. Lowest shoot regeneration was recorded in explants collected from unpruned (39.3%) shoots in highest number of days (21.3). The highest number of root formation was obtained in explants obtained from 75% pruned shoots in both guava species over 50% pruned shoots with 66.3% in cv. L-49 and 64.3% in P. friedrichsthalianum. Hence, the explants when collected after pruning gave better results for in vitro shoot initiation, shoot multiplication and root formation over the explants collected from unpruned shoots (control).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Explants from 50% and 75% pruned shoots gave better shoot regeneration and multiplication than unpruned controls in P. guajava cv. L-49.

Taxon
P. guajava LPsidium guajavae0
Material
cv. L-49e0
Organ / stage
Nodal segmentse5
Treatment
pruned shoots (50% and 75%)e0
Outcome
shoot regeneration and shoot multiplicatione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
unpruned (control) shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Explants collected from pruned shoots (50% and 75%) gave better shoot regeneration and shoot multiplication over the unpruned (control) shoots in case of P. guajava L cv. L-49”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–763 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nodal segments of new growth were used as explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In P. guajava cv. L-49, root formation was highest in explants from 75% pruned shoots, at 66.3%, above 50% pruned shoots.

Taxon
P. guajava LPsidium guajavae0
Material
cv. L-49e3
Treatment
75% pruned shootse3
Outcome
root formatione3
Direction
higheste3
Value
66.3%e3
Comparator
50% pruned shootse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Explants collected from pruned shoots (50% and 75%) gave better shoot regeneration and shoot multiplication over the unpruned (control) shoots in case of P. guajava L cv. L-49”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–763 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest number of root formation was obtained in explants obtained from 75% pruned shoots in both guava species over 50% pruned shoots with 66.3% in cv. L-49 and 64.3% in P. friedrichsthalianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In P. friedrichsthalianum, root formation was highest in explants from 75% pruned shoots, at 64.3%, above 50% pruned shoots.

Taxon
P. friedrichsthalianumPsidium friedrichsthalianume3
Treatment
75% pruned shootse3
Outcome
root formatione3
Direction
higheste3
Value
64.3%e3
Comparator
50% pruned shootse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium friedrichsthalianum
Psidium friedrichsthalianum · TaxonDaderot · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The highest number of root formation was obtained in explants obtained from 75% pruned shoots in both guava species over 50% pruned shoots with 66.3% in cv. L-49 and 64.3% in P. friedrichsthalianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In P. friedrichsthalianum, shoot regeneration was highest in explants from 50% pruned shoots, at 64.2%.

Taxon
P. friedrichsthalianumPsidium friedrichsthalianume1
Treatment
50% pruned shootse1
Outcome
shoot regeneratione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
64.2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium friedrichsthalianum
Psidium friedrichsthalianum · TaxonDaderot · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest numbers of shoot regeneration (64.2%) were recorded in explants obtained from 50% pruned shoots of P. friedrichsthalianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot regeneration was lowest in explants from unpruned guava shoots, at 39.3%, and was reached in the highest number of days (21.3).

Treatment
unpruned (39.3%) shootse2
Outcome
shoot regeneratione2
Direction
Loweste2
Value
39.3%e2
Qualifier
highest number of days (21.3)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Lowest shoot regeneration was recorded in explants collected from unpruned (39.3%) shoots in highest number of days (21.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1022 · show in text ↑
e4

“two species of guava namely, Psidium guajava L. and P. friedrichsthalianum (O. Berg) Nied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Explants collected after pruning gave better root formation than explants from unpruned shoots.

Treatment
collected after pruninge6
Outcome
root formatione6
Direction
bettere6
Comparator
unpruned shoots (control)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“two species of guava namely, Psidium guajava L. and P. friedrichsthalianum (O. Berg) Nied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–303 · show in text ↑
e6

“the explants when collected after pruning gave better results for in vitro shoot initiation, shoot multiplication and root formation over the explants collected from unpruned shoots (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1421 · show in text ↑

pruning · pest · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pruning · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 38 positive, 3 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.