Paper · 2024 · Functional Ecology

Variation of root functional traits indicates flexible below‐ground economic strategies of the riparian tree species Populus fremontii

Elena A. Schaefer; Catherine A. Gehring; Richard P. Phillips; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Plant‐mycorrhizal type has been suggested as an integrator of plant functional traits, yet most of what is known about these relationships comes from studies of different plant taxa, where the effects of mycorrhizal type cannot be isolated. In addition to affecting carbon‐nutrient exchanges, plants that associate with distinct mycorrhizal types often differ in several traits, with consequences for myriad below‐ground processes. We used two common gardens planted with Populus fremontii , a tree species that can simultaneously associate with both arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi, to examine the degree to which mycorrhizal‐type dominance influences root traits and trait relationships across the root economic space. While P. fremontii formed AM and ECM associations simultaneously, individuals displayed a dominant mycorrhizal type driven primarily by garden location. Trees in the low‐elevation garden, regardless of provenance, were colonized primarily by AM fungi, whereas trees in the high‐elevation garden were colonized primarily by ECM fungi. In root systems at the low‐elevation garden, AM colonization rates were negatively related to specific root length indicating trade‐off with investment in foraging roots. In contrast, root systems at the high‐elevation garden, ECM colonization was negatively related to root tissue density, demonstrating a potential trade‐off between resource acquisition and root growth/defence. All other root economic traits remained similar between mycorrhizal types. While root traits varied little between AM‐ and ECM‐dominated trees (and gardens), their relationships with one another differed in each garden, suggesting unique strategies and trait trade‐offs in a single species. As global change continues to alter environments, species like P. fremontii , which experience a range of abiotic conditions, could signal how other tree species might modify root traits and strategies in response. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fremontii formed AM and ECM associations simultaneously.

Taxon
P. fremontiiPopulus fremontiie0
Outcome
formed AM and ECM associations simultaneouslye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus fremontii
Populus fremontii · TaxonAmy Gaiennie, NPS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. fremontii formed AM and ECM associations simultaneously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–822 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garden location primarily determined dominant mycorrhizal type.

Outcome
dominant mycorrhizal typee0
Setting
garden locatione0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“individuals displayed a dominant mycorrhizal type driven primarily by garden location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–909 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low elevation garden trees were primarily colonized by AM fungi.

Taxon
Treese0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
colonized primarily by AM fungie0
Setting
low‐elevation gardene0

Verbatim

e0

“Trees in the low‐elevation garden, regardless of provenance, were colonized primarily by AM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1008 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High elevation garden trees were primarily colonized by ECM fungi.

Taxon
treese0
Interactor
ECM fungie0symbiont
Outcome
colonized primarily by ECM fungie0
Setting
high‐elevation gardene0

Verbatim

e0

“trees in the high‐elevation garden were colonized primarily by ECM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1090 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM colonization was negatively related to specific root length in the low elevation garden.

Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
specific root lengthe0
Direction
negatively relatede0
Setting
low‐elevation gardene0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In root systems at the low‐elevation garden, AM colonization rates were negatively related to specific root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1206 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ECM colonization was negatively related to root tissue density in the high elevation garden.

Interactor
ECMe0symbiont
Outcome
root tissue densitye0
Direction
negatively relatede0
Setting
high‐elevation gardene0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“root systems at the high‐elevation garden, ECM colonization was negatively related to root tissue density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1381 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other root economic traits were similar across mycorrhizal types.

Outcome
root economic traitse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
mycorrhizal typese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“All other root economic traits remained similar between mycorrhizal types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1547 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relationships among root traits differed between gardens.

Outcome
relationships with one anothere0
Direction
differede0
Setting
each gardene0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“their relationships with one another differed in each garden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1691 · show in text ↑