Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Growth, yield, weed control efficiency and economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices under varying tillage practices

Subhamitra Dash; Manoranjan Satapathy; Satyananda Jena

13
claims
35
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment entitled “Integrated weed management in sweet corn under different tillage practices” was conducted during rabi season of 2021-22 at Agronomy Main Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar. The experiment was laid out in a strip plot design with three replications. Three tillage treatments were assigned to the main plot viz., T1-conventional tillage (CT), T2-zero tillage by dibbling (ZT) and T3- zero tillage+mulching with paddy straw @5 t/ha (ZT+M) and four weed management practices viz., W1- Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence), W2-Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS, W3-Manual weeding at 3 0 DAS and W4-Weedy check. The soil of the experimental site was sandy loam in texture with pH 5.6, bulk density (B.D) 1.5 Mg m3, organic carbon 6.3 g/kg, available nitrogen 218.32 kg/ha, phosphorus 21.31 kg/ha and potassium 127.29 kg/ha. The sweet corn variety “Sugar 75” was grown as the test crop. Among the tillage practices, zero tillage +mulching was the best treatment. Among the weed management methods Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg /ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS was found to be the best. It recorded lowest weed density (46.81 no./m2). The interaction plot zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS had the least weed density at 60 DAS (39.08 no/m2), least weed dry weight (19.3 g/m2 at 60 DAS), highest weed control efficiency (66.1% at harvest. It also resulted in better plant characters such as plant height (179.0 cm), LAI of 4.98 at 60 DAS, fresh cob yield of 18.20 t/ha and green fodder yield of 31 t/ha. Zero tillage practice along with rice straw mulching @5 t/ha and pre emergence application of herbicide Pendimethalin and atrazine @ 0.5 kg/ha fb one manual weeding 30 DAS resulted in highest net return of Rs 176000/ha and maximum B:C ratio (3.01), hence proved as the best treatment among all.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with mulching was the best tillage treatment for sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne2
Treatment
zero tillage +mulchinge1
Outcome
best treatmente1
Direction
beste1
Comparator
tillage practicese1
Setting
Agronomy Main Research Farme3

Verbatim

e1

“Among the tillage practices, zero tillage +mulching was the best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1095 · show in text ↑
e2

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“was conducted during rabi season of 2021-22 at Agronomy Main Research Farm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin and atrazine pre-emergence followed by one manual weeding at 30 DAS was the best weed management method for sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne2
Treatment
Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg /ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DASe1
Outcome
the beste1
Direction
beste1
Comparator
weed management methodse1

Verbatim

e1

“Among the weed management methods Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg /ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS was found to be the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1239 · show in text ↑
e2

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin and atrazine pre-emergence followed by one manual weeding at 30 DAS recorded the lowest weed density, 46.81 no./m2.

Taxon
sweet corne3
Treatment
Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg /ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DASe1
Outcome
weed densitye2
Direction
loweste2
Value
46.81 no./m2e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Among the weed management methods Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg /ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS was found to be the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1239 · show in text ↑
e2

“It recorded lowest weed density (46.81 no./m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1287 · show in text ↑
e3

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of zero tillage with mulching and Pendimethalin and atrazine plus one manual weeding had the least weed density at 60 DAS, 39.08 no/m2.

Taxon
sweet corne2
Treatment
zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DASe1
Outcome
weed densitye1
Direction
leaste1
Value
39.08 no/m2e1
Qualifier
at 60 DASe1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The interaction plot zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS had the least weed density at 60 DAS (39.08 no/m2), least weed dry weight (19.3 g/m2 at 60 DAS), highest weed control efficiency (66.1% at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1580 · show in text ↑
e2

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same interaction had the least weed dry weight, 19.3 g/m2 at 60 DAS.

Taxon
sweet corne2
Treatment
zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DASe1
Outcome
weed dry weighte1
Direction
leaste1
Value
19.3 g/m2e1
Qualifier
at 60 DASe1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The interaction plot zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS had the least weed density at 60 DAS (39.08 no/m2), least weed dry weight (19.3 g/m2 at 60 DAS), highest weed control efficiency (66.1% at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1580 · show in text ↑
e2

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same interaction had the highest weed control efficiency, 66.1% at harvest.

Taxon
sweet corne2
Treatment
zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DASe1
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
66.1%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The interaction plot zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS had the least weed density at 60 DAS (39.08 no/m2), least weed dry weight (19.3 g/m2 at 60 DAS), highest weed control efficiency (66.1% at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1580 · show in text ↑
e2

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of zero tillage with mulching and Pendimethalin and atrazine plus one manual weeding gave better plant height, 179.0 cm.

Taxon
sweet corne3
Treatment
zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DASe1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
bettere2
Value
179.0 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The interaction plot zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS had the least weed density at 60 DAS (39.08 no/m2), least weed dry weight (19.3 g/m2 at 60 DAS), highest weed control efficiency (66.1% at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1580 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also resulted in better plant characters such as plant height (179.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1657 · show in text ↑
e3

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same interaction gave better LAI, 4.98 at 60 DAS.

Taxon
sweet corne4
Treatment
zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DASe1
Outcome
LAIe3
Direction
bettere2
Value
4.98e3
Qualifier
at 60 DASe3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The interaction plot zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS had the least weed density at 60 DAS (39.08 no/m2), least weed dry weight (19.3 g/m2 at 60 DAS), highest weed control efficiency (66.1% at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1580 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also resulted in better plant characters such as plant height (179.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1657 · show in text ↑
e3

“LAI of 4.98 at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1680 · show in text ↑
e4

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same interaction gave better fresh cob yield, 18.20 t/ha.

Taxon
sweet corne4
Treatment
zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DASe1
Outcome
fresh cob yielde3
Direction
bettere2
Value
18.20 t/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The interaction plot zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS had the least weed density at 60 DAS (39.08 no/m2), least weed dry weight (19.3 g/m2 at 60 DAS), highest weed control efficiency (66.1% at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1580 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also resulted in better plant characters such as plant height (179.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1657 · show in text ↑
e3

“fresh cob yield of 18.20 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1711 · show in text ↑
e4

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same interaction gave better green fodder yield, 31 t/ha.

Taxon
sweet corne4
Treatment
zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DASe1
Outcome
green fodder yielde3
Direction
bettere2
Value
31 t/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The interaction plot zero tillage+ mulching supplemented with Pendimethalin and atrazine @0.5 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one manual weeding 30 DAS had the least weed density at 60 DAS (39.08 no/m2), least weed dry weight (19.3 g/m2 at 60 DAS), highest weed control efficiency (66.1% at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1580 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also resulted in better plant characters such as plant height (179.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1657 · show in text ↑
e3

“green fodder yield of 31 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1745 · show in text ↑
e4

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with rice straw mulching and pre-emergence herbicide plus one manual weeding gave the highest net return, Rs 176000/ha.

Taxon
sweet corne2
Treatment
Zero tillage practice along with rice straw mulching @5 t/hae1
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
higheste1
Value
Rs 176000/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Zero tillage practice along with rice straw mulching @5 t/ha and pre emergence application of herbicide Pendimethalin and atrazine @ 0.5 kg/ha fb one manual weeding 30 DAS resulted in highest net return of Rs 176000/ha and maximum B:C ratio (3.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1994 · show in text ↑
e2

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with rice straw mulching and pre-emergence herbicide plus one manual weeding gave the maximum B:C ratio, 3.01.

Taxon
sweet corne2
Treatment
Zero tillage practice along with rice straw mulching @5 t/hae1
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
3.01e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Zero tillage practice along with rice straw mulching @5 t/ha and pre emergence application of herbicide Pendimethalin and atrazine @ 0.5 kg/ha fb one manual weeding 30 DAS resulted in highest net return of Rs 176000/ha and maximum B:C ratio (3.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1994 · show in text ↑
e2

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with rice straw mulching and pre-emergence herbicide plus one manual weeding was the best treatment among all tested for sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne2
Outcome
best treatmente1
Qualifier
among alle1

Verbatim

e1

“hence proved as the best treatment among all”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1996–2040 · show in text ↑
e2

“economics of sweet corn as influenced by integrated weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–120 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

54 papers: 52 positive, 2 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

pendimethalin · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

atrazine · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 41 positive, 15 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 63 positive, 3 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

mulching · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 48 positive, 7 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

8 of 17 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.