Paper · 2024 · Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development

Response of onion growth and seed yield to various phosphorus rates and foliar application of Nano-Boron, Nano-Chitosan and Naphthalene Acetic Acid

Mohamed Abd Allah Azab; Zakaria F. Fawzy; Mohamed A. Abdein; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Onion (Allium cepa L.) is one of the important vegetables in Egypt. The study was conducted in the vegetable field to study the effect of different rates of phosphorus fertilizers and foliar application of Nano-Boron, Chitosan, and Naphthalene Acidic Acid (NAA) on growth and seed productivity of Onion plant (Allium cepa L., cv. Giza 6 Mohassan). The experiments were carried out in a split-plot design with three replicates. The main plot contains 3 rates of phosphorus treatments (30, 45 and 60 kg P2O5/feddan), Subplot includes foliar application of Nano-Boron, Nano-Chitosan and Naphthalene Acidic Acid (NAA) at a concentration of 50 ppm for each and sprayed at three times (50, 65 and 80 days after transplanting). Increasing the phosphorus fertilizers rate to 60 kg P2O5/fed significantly affects the growth and seed production of the Onion plant. Foliar application of nano-boron at 50 ppm concentration gave maximum values of onion seed yield in both seasons. Results stated that the correlation between yield and yield contributing characters over two years was highly significant. It could be recommended that P application at a rate of 60 kg P2O5 and sprayed onion plants at 50 ppm nano-boron three times (at 50, 65, and 80 days from transplanting) gave the highest seed yield of onion plants. Moreover, the maximum increments of inflorescence diameter (94.4%) were recorded to nano-boron foliar spray (60 p × nB) compared to the other treatments in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus fertilizer to 60 kg P2O5/fed significantly affected onion growth and seed production.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepae0
Treatment
phosphorus fertilizers rate to 60 kg P2O5/fede0
Outcome
growth and seed productione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the phosphorus fertilizers rate to 60 kg P2O5/fed significantly affects the growth and seed production of the Onion plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-boron at 50 ppm gave maximum onion seed yield in both seasons.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Foliar application of nano-boron at 50 ppme0
Outcome
onion seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of nano-boron at 50 ppm concentration gave maximum values of onion seed yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–967 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and yield contributing characters were highly significantly correlated over two years.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepae1
Organ / stage
yield contributing characterse0
Outcome
correlation between yield and yield contributing characterse0
Qualifier
over two yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the correlation between yield and yield contributing characters over two years was highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1090 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed productivity of Onion plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–308 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60 kg P2O5 and three 50 ppm nano-boron sprays for the highest onion seed yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
P application at a rate of 60 kg P2O5 and sprayed onion plants at 50 ppm nano-boron three times (at 50, 65, and 80 days from transplanting)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P application at a rate of 60 kg P2O5 and sprayed onion plants at 50 ppm nano-boron three times (at 50, 65, and 80 days from transplanting) gave the highest seed yield of onion plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-boron foliar spray in the 60 p × nB treatment maximized inflorescence diameter, increasing it 94.4% over other treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
nano-boron foliar spray (60 p × nB)e0
Outcome
inflorescence diametere0
Direction
maximum incrementse0
Value
94.4%e0
Qualifier
both seasonse0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum increments of inflorescence diameter (94.4%) were recorded to nano-boron foliar spray (60 p × nB) compared to the other treatments in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1474 · show in text ↑
e1

“sprayed onion plants at 50 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1193 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

60 papers: 55 positive, 5 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 70 positive, 4 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

application · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Foliar boron decreased yields in onions.

    The Contribution of Foliar Exposure to Boron Toxicity · 2007 · compared with without a component of foliar contact

    Opposite direction

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.