Paper · 2024 · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Order of arrival and nutrient supply alter outcomes of co-infection with two fungal pathogens

Elizabeth T. Green; Rita L. Grunberg; Charles E. Mitchell

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A pathogen arriving on a host typically encounters a diverse community of microbes that can shape priority effects, other within-host interactions and infection outcomes. In plants, environmental nutrients can drive trade-offs between host growth and defence and can mediate interactions between co-infecting pathogens. Nutrients may thus alter the outcome of pathogen priority effects for the host, but this possibility has received little experimental investigation. To disentangle the relationship between nutrient availability and co-infection dynamics, we factorially manipulated the nutrient availability and order of arrival of two foliar fungal pathogens ( Rhizoctonia solani and Colletotrichum cereale ) on the grass tall fescue ( Lolium arundinaceum ) and tracked disease outcomes. Nutrient addition did not influence infection rates, infection severity or plant biomass. Colletotrichum cereale facilitated R. solani , increasing its infection rate regardless of their order of inoculation. Additionally, simultaneous and C. cereale -first inoculations decreased plant growth and—in plants that did not receive nutrient addition—increased leaf nitrogen concentrations compared to uninoculated plants. These effects were partially, but not completely, explained by the duration and severity of pathogen infections. This study highlights the importance of understanding the intricate associations between the order of pathogen arrival, host nutrient availability and host defence to better predict infection outcomes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient addition did not influence infection rates, infection severity or plant biomass in tall fescue.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
Nutrient additione0
Outcome
infection rates, infection severity or plant biomasse0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient addition did not influence infection rates, infection severity or plant biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colletotrichum cereale facilitated R. solani, increasing its infection rate regardless of the order of inoculation.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
Colletotrichum cerealee0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Colletotrichum cerealeColletotrichum cerealee0pathogen
Outcome
infection ratee0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
regardless of their order of inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colletotrichum cereale facilitated R. solani , increasing its infection rate regardless of their order of inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous and C. cereale-first inoculations decreased plant growth compared with uninoculated tall fescue plants.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
simultaneous and C. cereale -first inoculationse0
Interactor
C. cerealeColletotrichum cerealee0pathogen
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simultaneous and C. cereale -first inoculations decreased plant growth and—in plants that did not receive nutrient addition—increased leaf nitrogen concentrations compared to uninoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1209 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In plants without nutrient addition, simultaneous and C. cereale-first inoculations increased leaf nitrogen concentrations compared with uninoculated plants.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
simultaneous and C. cereale -first inoculationse0
Interactor
C. cerealeColletotrichum cerealee0pathogen
Outcome
leaf nitrogen concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in plants that did not receive nutrient additione0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simultaneous and C. cereale -first inoculations decreased plant growth and—in plants that did not receive nutrient addition—increased leaf nitrogen concentrations compared to uninoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1209 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–737 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effects of the inoculations were partially, but not completely, explained by the duration and severity of pathogen infections.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Outcome
effectse0
Qualifier
partially, but not completely, explained by the duration and severity of pathogen infectionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These effects were partially, but not completely, explained by the duration and severity of pathogen infections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1322 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–737 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.