Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

Influence of a New Generation Fungicide on Fusarium Head Blight in Spring Barley

Simbo Diakite; Ousmane Diarra; Rabiatou Diarra; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fusarium head blight is a serious problem in both traditional and intensive agriculture. The way to solve this problem is to use combined systemic fungicides. We therefore studied the effect of the new-generation fungicides Alto Super and KE (Propiconazole 250 g/l and Ciproconazole 80 g/l) combined with the foliar fertilizer Ultramag Super Sulphur-900. Laboratory studies were carried out at the Plant Pathology Laboratory of the People's Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), and field experiments were carried out in 2022 at the experimental field station of the Federal Research Centre "Nemchinovka." Fusarium head blight appeared in late July and early August. The application of the new-generation fungicide Alto Super, KE, alone and in combination with the new foliar fertilizer Ultramag Super Sulphur considerably reduced the development of the epiphytotic fungal disease. Their biological efficacy was 44.53–83.36%. The yield of Nur Spring barley in the experimental variants was higher than in the control variant. The yield gain of spring barley increased by 5.85% for Alto Super, KE, 9.40% for Ultramag Super Sulphur-900, and 12.85% for Alto Super, KE, and Ultramag Super Sulphur-900.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium head blight appeared in late July and early August.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium head blighte0
Qualifier
late July and early Auguste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium head blight appeared in late July and early August.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alto Super alone considerably reduced Fusarium head blight development.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Alto Super, KEe0
Outcome
development of the epiphytotic fungal diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
44.53–83.36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the new-generation fungicide Alto Super, KE, alone and in combination with the new foliar fertilizer Ultramag Super Sulphur considerably reduced the development of the epiphytotic fungal disease. Their biological efficacy was 44.53–83.36%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alto Super combined with Ultramag Super Sulphur considerably reduced disease development.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Alto Super, KE, alone and in combination with the new foliar fertilizer Ultramag Super Sulphure0
Outcome
development of the epiphytotic fungal diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
44.53–83.36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the new-generation fungicide Alto Super, KE, alone and in combination with the new foliar fertilizer Ultramag Super Sulphur considerably reduced the development of the epiphytotic fungal disease. Their biological efficacy was 44.53–83.36%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alto Super increased barley yield by 5.85% against control.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Alto Super, KEe0
Outcome
yield gaine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield gain of spring barley increased by 5.85% for Alto Super, KE, 9.40% for Ultramag Super Sulphur-900, and 12.85% for Alto Super, KE, and Ultramag Super Sulphur-900.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ultramag Super Sulphur increased barley yield by 9.40%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Ultramag Super Sulphur-900e0
Outcome
yield gaine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield gain of spring barley increased by 5.85% for Alto Super, KE, 9.40% for Ultramag Super Sulphur-900, and 12.85% for Alto Super, KE, and Ultramag Super Sulphur-900.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Alto Super and Ultramag increased barley yield by 12.85%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Alto Super, KE, and Ultramag Super Sulphur-900e0
Outcome
yield gaine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield gain of spring barley increased by 5.85% for Alto Super, KE, 9.40% for Ultramag Super Sulphur-900, and 12.85% for Alto Super, KE, and Ultramag Super Sulphur-900.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1199 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

fertilization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 138 positive, 27 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.