Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Assessing Heat Stress Tolerance of Wheat Genotypes through Integrated Molecular and Physio-Biochemical Analyses

Mohammed Sallam; Ibrahim Al-Ashkar; Abdullah Al-Doss; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
7
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Heat as an abiotic stress significantly impairs the sustainable productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). To determine the tolerance of genotypes to heat stress, a comprehensive approach should be used that integrates simultaneous phenotyping and genotyping analyses. The aim of this study is to identify local heat-tolerant genotypes using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and evaluate the selected genotypes under field conditions for their tolerance to heat stress. Of the 12 SSR markers that showed polymorphism, eight were associated with six important traits. The use of hierarchical cluster analysis (HC) based on SSR markers led to the identification of 13 genotypes that showed varying results and were grouped into three distinct heat tolerance classes: tolerant (T), moderately tolerant (MT), and sensitive (S). The results showed that heat stress had a significant effect on 19 traits under this study, with significant variation in tolerance to heat stress between genotypes. The tolerant genotypes exhibited a range of average thousand-kernel weight (TKW) values between 40.56 and 44.85, while the sensitive genotype (Yecora Rojo) had an average TKW of 35.45. Furthermore, the tolerant genotypes showed two to three times higher levels of antioxidants compared to the sensitive genotypes when exposed to heat stress. Among the traits analyzed, six showed a favorable combination of high heritability (>60%) and genetic gain (>20%). Through the integration of principal component analysis and stepwise multiple linear regression, it was determined that six traits (grain yield, 1000-kernel weight, plant height, intercellular carbon dioxide, flag leaf area, and grain filling duration) revealed differences between the 13 genotypes. HC analysis of the six traits resulted in the same division of genotypes into three main categories as observed in an HC analysis based on SSR markers. It is worth noting that Saudi wheat, including KSU106, KSU105, and KSU115 as local genotypes, in addition to the 16HTWYT-22 genotype, showed higher heat tolerance compared to the other genotypes tested, indicating its potential suitability for agriculture in Saudi Arabia. These results contribute to breeding programs focused on developing heat-tolerant wheat varieties and accelerate progress in wheat productivity improvement programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight polymorphic SSR markers were associated with six traits.

Gene
SSR markerse0
Outcome
six important traitse0
Value
eighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the 12 SSR markers that showed polymorphism, eight were associated with six important traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSR marker clustering classified 13 genotypes into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and sensitive classes.

Outcome
three distinct heat tolerance classese0
Value
13 genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of hierarchical cluster analysis (HC) based on SSR markers led to the identification of 13 genotypes that showed varying results and were grouped into three distinct heat tolerance classes: tolerant (T), moderately tolerant (MT), and sensitive (S).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress significantly affected 19 traits.

Treatment
heat stresse0
Outcome
19 traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat stress had a significant effect on 19 traits under this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes varied significantly in heat stress tolerance.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
tolerance to heat stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant variation in tolerance to heat stress between genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant genotypes had average thousand-kernel weights between 40.56 and 44.85, compared with 35.45 in Yecora Rojo.

Material
tolerant genotypese0
Outcome
thousand-kernel weight (TKW)e0
Value
between 40.56 and 44.85e0
Qualifier
35.45e0
Comparator
Yecora Rojoe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tolerant genotypes exhibited a range of average thousand-kernel weight (TKW) values between 40.56 and 44.85, while the sensitive genotype (Yecora Rojo) had an average TKW of 35.45.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under heat stress, tolerant genotypes had two to three times higher antioxidant levels than sensitive genotypes.

Material
tolerant genotypese0
Outcome
levels of antioxidantse0
Direction
highere0
Value
two to three timese0
Qualifier
when exposed to heat stresse0
Comparator
sensitive genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tolerant genotypes showed two to three times higher levels of antioxidants compared to the sensitive genotypes when exposed to heat stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six traits had heritability above 60%.

Outcome
heritabilitye0
Direction
highe0
Value
>60%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six showed a favorable combination of high heritability (>60%) and genetic gain (>20%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six traits had genetic gain above 20%.

Outcome
genetic gaine0
Value
>20%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six showed a favorable combination of high heritability (>60%) and genetic gain (>20%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six measured traits differentiated the 13 genotypes.

Outcome
six traitse0
Value
13 genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six traits (grain yield, 1000-kernel weight, plant height, intercellular carbon dioxide, flag leaf area, and grain filling duration) revealed differences between the 13 genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clustering on six traits reproduced the three genotype categories from SSR markers.

Outcome
same division of genotypes into three main categoriese0
Comparator
HC analysis based on SSR markerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HC analysis of the six traits resulted in the same division of genotypes into three main categories as observed in an HC analysis based on SSR markers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KSU106 showed higher heat tolerance than the other tested genotypes.

Material
KSU106e0
Outcome
heat tolerancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other genotypes testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KSU106, KSU105, and KSU115 as local genotypes, in addition to the 16HTWYT-22 genotype, showed higher heat tolerance compared to the other genotypes tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KSU105 showed higher heat tolerance than the other tested genotypes.

Material
KSU105e0
Outcome
heat tolerancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other genotypes testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KSU106, KSU105, and KSU115 as local genotypes, in addition to the 16HTWYT-22 genotype, showed higher heat tolerance compared to the other genotypes tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KSU115 showed higher heat tolerance than the other tested genotypes.

Material
KSU115e0
Outcome
heat tolerancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other genotypes testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KSU106, KSU105, and KSU115 as local genotypes, in addition to the 16HTWYT-22 genotype, showed higher heat tolerance compared to the other genotypes tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

16HTWYT-22 showed higher heat tolerance than the other tested genotypes.

Material
16HTWYT-22e0
Outcome
heat tolerancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other genotypes testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“16HTWYT-22 genotype, showed higher heat tolerance compared to the other genotypes tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2019–2107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑