Paper · 2024 · Microbiology Spectrum

Pathogenicity, phylogenomic, and comparative genomic study of Pseudomonas syringae sensu lato affecting sweet cherry in California

Tawanda E. Maguvu; Rosa J. Frias; Alejandro I. Hernandez-Rosas; et al.

19
claims
34
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT To gain insights into the diversity of Pseudomonas syringae sensu lato affecting sweet cherry in California, we sequenced and analyzed the phylogenomic and genomic architecture of 86 fluorescent pseudomonads isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic cherry tissues. Fifty-eight isolates were phylogenetically placed within the P. syringae species complex and taxonomically classified into five genomospecies: P. syringae pv. syringae , P. syringae , Pseudomonas cerasi , Pseudomonas viridiflava , and A . We annotated components of the type III secretion system and phytotoxin-encoding genes and correlated the data with pathogenicity phenotypes. Intact probable regulatory protein HrpR was annotated in the genomic sequences of all isolates of P. syringae pv. syringae , P. syringae , P. cerasi , and A . Isolates of P. viridiflava had atypical probable regulatory protein HrpR. Syringomycin and syringopeptin-encoding genes were annotated in isolates of all genomospecies except for A and P. viridiflava . All isolates of P. syringae pv. syringae caused cankers, leaf spots, and fruit lesions in the field. In contrast, all isolates of P. syringae and P. cerasi and some isolates of P. viridiflava caused only cankers. Isolates of genomospecies A could not cause any symptoms suggesting phytotoxins are essential for pathogenicity. On detached immature cherry fruit pathogenicity assays, isolates of all five genomospecies produced symptoms (black–dark brown lesions). However, symptoms of isolates of genomospecies A were significantly ( P < 0.01) less severe than those of other genomospecies. We also mined for genes conferring resistance to copper and kasugamycin and correlated these data with in vitro antibiotic sensitivity tests. IMPORTANCE Comprehensive identification of phytopathogens and an in-depth understanding of their genomic architecture, particularly virulence determinants and antibiotic-resistant genes, are critical for several practical reasons. These include disease diagnosis, improved knowledge of disease epidemiology, pathogen diversity, and determination of the best possible management strategies. In this study, we provide the first report of the presence and pathogenicity of genomospecies Pseudomonas cerasi and Pseudomonas viridiflava in California sweet cherry. More importantly, we report a relatively high level of resistance to copper among the population of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae (47.5%). This implies copper cannot be effectively used to control bacterial blast and bacterial canker of sweet cherries. On the other hand, no isolates were resistant to kasugamycin, an indication that kasugamycin could be effectively used for the control of bacterial blast and bacterial canker. Our findings are important to improve the management of bacterial blast and bacterial canker of sweet cherries in California.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty-eight cherry isolates fell within the P. syringae complex and five genomospecies.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
P. syringae species complexPseudomonas syringaee0pathogen
Outcome
phylogenetically placed within the P. syringae species complex and taxonomically classified into five genomospeciese0
Value
Fifty-eight isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fifty-eight isolates were phylogenetically placed within the P. syringae species complex and taxonomically classified into five genomospecies: P. syringae pv. syringae , P. syringae , Pseudomonas cerasi , Pseudomonas viridiflava , and A .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intact probable HrpR was annotated in P. syringae pv. syringae isolates.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
P. syringae pv. syringaePseudomonas syringae pv. syringaee0pathogen
Gene
HrpRe0
Outcome
Intact probable regulatory protein HrpRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae · Interactor · picture of the speciesHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intact probable regulatory protein HrpR was annotated in the genomic sequences of all isolates of P. syringae pv. syringae , P. syringae , P. cerasi , and A .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intact probable HrpR was annotated in P. syringae isolates.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
P. syringaePseudomonas syringaee0pathogen
Gene
HrpRe0
Outcome
Intact probable regulatory protein HrpRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intact probable regulatory protein HrpR was annotated in the genomic sequences of all isolates of P. syringae pv. syringae , P. syringae , P. cerasi , and A .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intact probable HrpR was annotated in P. cerasi isolates.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
P. cerasiPseudomonas cerasie0pathogen
Gene
HrpRe0
Outcome
Intact probable regulatory protein HrpRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intact probable regulatory protein HrpR was annotated in the genomic sequences of all isolates of P. syringae pv. syringae , P. syringae , P. cerasi , and A .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intact probable HrpR was annotated in genomospecies A isolates.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
Ae0pathogen
Gene
HrpRe0
Outcome
Intact probable regulatory protein HrpRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intact probable regulatory protein HrpR was annotated in the genomic sequences of all isolates of P. syringae pv. syringae , P. syringae , P. cerasi , and A .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. viridiflava isolates had atypical probable HrpR.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
P. viridiflavaPseudomonas viridiflavae0pathogen
Gene
HrpRe0
Outcome
atypical probable regulatory protein HrpRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas viridiflava
Pseudomonas viridiflava · InteractorReihan Hajian · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates of P. viridiflava had atypical probable regulatory protein HrpR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Syringomycin and syringopeptin genes were found in the other genomospecies but not A or P. viridiflava.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Gene
Syringomycin and syringopeptin-encoding genese0
Outcome
Syringomycin and syringopeptin-encoding genese0
Qualifier
except for A and P. viridiflavae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Syringomycin and syringopeptin-encoding genes were annotated in isolates of all genomospecies except for A and P. viridiflava .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. syringae pv. syringae caused cankers, leaf spots and fruit lesions in the field.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
P. syringae pv. syringaePseudomonas syringae pv. syringaee0pathogen
Outcome
cankers, leaf spots, and fruit lesionse0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae · Interactor · picture of the speciesHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All isolates of P. syringae pv. syringae caused cankers, leaf spots, and fruit lesions in the field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. syringae isolates caused only cankers in the field.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
P. syringaePseudomonas syringaee0pathogen
Outcome
cankerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, all isolates of P. syringae and P. cerasi and some isolates of P. viridiflava caused only cankers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. cerasi isolates caused only cankers.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
P. cerasiPseudomonas cerasie0pathogen
Outcome
cankerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, all isolates of P. syringae and P. cerasi and some isolates of P. viridiflava caused only cankers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some P. viridiflava isolates caused only cankers.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
P. viridiflavaPseudomonas viridiflavae0pathogen
Outcome
cankerse0
Qualifier
some isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas viridiflava
Pseudomonas viridiflava · InteractorReihan Hajian · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, all isolates of P. syringae and P. cerasi and some isolates of P. viridiflava caused only cankers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genomospecies A caused no field symptoms.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
genomospecies Ae0pathogen
Outcome
could not cause any symptomse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates of genomospecies A could not cause any symptoms suggesting phytotoxins are essential for pathogenicity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All five genomospecies produced dark lesions on detached immature cherry fruit.

Taxon
cherrye0
Organ / stage
detached immature cherry fruite0
Interactor
all five genomospeciese0pathogen
Outcome
symptoms (black–dark brown lesions)e0

Verbatim

e0

“On detached immature cherry fruit pathogenicity assays, isolates of all five genomospecies produced symptoms (black–dark brown lesions).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1480 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genomospecies A lesions were significantly less severe than those of other genomospecies.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
genomospecies Ae0pathogen
Outcome
symptomse0
Direction
less severee0
Value
P < 0.01e0
Comparator
other genomospeciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, symptoms of isolates of genomospecies A were significantly ( P < 0.01) less severe than those of other genomospecies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. cerasi was reported as present and pathogenic on California sweet cherry.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Interactor
Pseudomonas cerasiPseudomonas cerasie0pathogen
Outcome
presence and pathogenicitye0
Setting
Californiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“first report of the presence and pathogenicity of genomospecies Pseudomonas cerasi and Pseudomonas viridiflava in California sweet cherry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2170–2308 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. viridiflava was reported as present and pathogenic on California sweet cherry.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Interactor
Pseudomonas viridiflavaPseudomonas viridiflavae0pathogen
Outcome
presence and pathogenicitye0
Setting
Californiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas viridiflava
Pseudomonas viridiflava · InteractorReihan Hajian · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“first report of the presence and pathogenicity of genomospecies Pseudomonas cerasi and Pseudomonas viridiflava in California sweet cherry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2170–2308 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper resistance in P. syringae pv. syringae was 47.5%.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringaePseudomonas syringae pv. syringaee0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to coppere0
Value
47.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae · Interactor · picture of the speciesHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a relatively high level of resistance to copper among the population of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae (47.5%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2337–2451 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No isolates were resistant to kasugamycin.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Outcome
no isolates were resistant to kasugamycine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no isolates were resistant to kasugamycin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2585–2626 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude copper cannot effectively control bacterial blast and canker of sweet cherry.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Outcome
copper cannot be effectively used to control bacterial blast and bacterial cankere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This implies copper cannot be effectively used to control bacterial blast and bacterial canker of sweet cherries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2452–2565 · show in text ↑