Paper · 2024 · Crop and Environment

Light condition during grain-filling stage of main crop strongly influences ratooning ability of low-stubble ratoon rice

Xiangyu Hu; Boyu Yan; Yanzhuo Liu; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Compared with high-stubble ratoon rice (RR), low-stubble RR is superior in yield potential, grain quality, and economic benefit. However, the unstable ratooning ability limits the grain yield of low-stubble RR production. Light condition during the grain-filling stage of main crop (GFMC) may be important for rice ratooning. To elucidate the role of light condition during GFMC in affecting ratooning ability, the key response periods, and their underlying mechanisms, field experiments were conducted using two indica cultivars in 2021 and 2022. To create varied light conditions at the canopy base during GFMC, two planting density treatments combining three nitrogen (N) treatments were established in 2021, and three density treatments combining two N treatments and four shading treatments were established in 2022 for the main crop. Light intensity (LI), light quality as reflected by the ratio of red light/far red light (R/FR), and light transmission ratio (LTR) at the canopy base during GFMC, and ratooning ability were dramatically altered by N fertilization but not by planting density. With increased N application, LTR, root bleeding rate, and maximum ratooning rate significantly decreased in 2021. In 2022, low N rate increased LI, R/FR, and maximum ratooning rate by 155.7–241.4%, 47.4–65.3%, and 15.6–27.5%, respectively, but reduced missing hill percentage (proportion of hills without regenerated tillers to the total number of hills) by 30.0–62.1% compared with high N rate. The missing hill percentage was negatively correlated with the indices of light condition, while the maximum ratooning rate was positively correlated with them for both cultivars. Root activity and the ratios of abscisic acid (ABA) to cytokinins (CTK), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and IAA ​+ ​CTK could explain the effect of light condition during GFMC on ratooning ability. Shading experiment confirmed the effect of light condition on ratooning ability and further revealed that only shading during middle and late GFMC affected ratooning ability. These findings provide new insights into the regulation of ratooning ability, which are useful for developing management practices to increase the grain yield and yield stability of low-stubble RR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization altered canopy-base light conditions and ratooning ability.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
Light intensity (LI), light quality as reflected by the ratio of red light/far red light (R/FR), and light transmission ratio (LTR)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light intensity (LI), light quality as reflected by the ratio of red light/far red light (R/FR), and light transmission ratio (LTR) at the canopy base during GFMC, and ratooning ability were dramatically altered by N fertilization but not by planting density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density did not alter canopy-base light conditions and ratooning ability.

Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
ratooning abilitye0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ratooning ability were dramatically altered by N fertilization but not by planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N application significantly decreased light transmission ratio, root bleeding rate and maximum ratooning rate.

Treatment
increased N applicatione0
Outcome
LTR, root bleeding rate, and maximum ratooning ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
2021e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increased N application, LTR, root bleeding rate, and maximum ratooning rate significantly decreased in 2021.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N increased light intensity by 155.7–241.4%.

Treatment
low N ratee0
Outcome
LIe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
155.7–241.4%e0
Comparator
high N ratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low N rate increased LI, R/FR, and maximum ratooning rate by 155.7–241.4%, 47.4–65.3%, and 15.6–27.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1339 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with high N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N increased red to far red light ratio by 47.4–65.3%.

Treatment
low N ratee0
Outcome
R/FRe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
47.4–65.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low N rate increased LI, R/FR, and maximum ratooning rate by 155.7–241.4%, 47.4–65.3%, and 15.6–27.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N increased maximum ratooning rate by 15.6–27.5%.

Treatment
low N ratee0
Outcome
maximum ratooning ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.6–27.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low N rate increased LI, R/FR, and maximum ratooning rate by 155.7–241.4%, 47.4–65.3%, and 15.6–27.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N reduced missing hill percentage by 30.0–62.1% versus high N.

Treatment
low N ratee1
Outcome
missing hill percentagee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30.0–62.1%e0
Comparator
high N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced missing hill percentage (proportion of hills without regenerated tillers to the total number of hills) by 30.0–62.1% compared with high N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1495 · show in text ↑
e1

“low N rate increased LI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Missing hill percentage correlated negatively with light indices.

Outcome
missing hill percentagee0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Comparator
indices of light conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The missing hill percentage was negatively correlated with the indices of light condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum ratooning rate correlated positively with light indices.

Material
both cultivarse0
Outcome
maximum ratooning ratee0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum ratooning rate was positively correlated with them for both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1675 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root activity and hormone ratios could explain the light effect on ratooning.

Outcome
ratooning abilitye0
Qualifier
Root activity and the ratios of abscisic acid (ABA) to cytokinins (CTK), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and IAA ​+ ​CTKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root activity and the ratios of abscisic acid (ABA) to cytokinins (CTK), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and IAA ​+ ​CTK could explain the effect of light condition during GFMC on ratooning ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1871 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading in middle and late grain filling affected ratooning ability.

Treatment
shading during middle and late GFMCe0
Outcome
ratooning abilitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only shading during middle and late GFMC affected ratooning ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1978–2045 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 39 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.