Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effects of different source zinc and application methods on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under timely sowing crop

Vipin Kumar Yadav; Phool Chandra Singh; Jitender Yadav; et al.

13
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has been described as the kin of cereals and one of the most important staple food crops cultivated in at least 43 countries. This study, was conducted field experiment during rabi season of 2021-22 and 2022-23 at Shri Durga ji Post-graduate College Chandeshwar Azamgarh Uttar Pradesh, India. Investigating different micro nutrient management approaches with cost effective and plant need based micro fertilizer recommendations. These approaches provide principles and tools for supplying different dose of Zinc for crop nutrients to achieve higher yield. These methods not only aim to modify micro nutrient dose but also apply at optimal rate and time to achieve higher yield and nutrient efficiency by the crop. The wheat growing area Zn deficiency one of the major problems of wheat area. The experiment consisted five treatment and nutrient management options as applied in sources Zn in different treatments. T1 -Control: seed soaking with distilled water (6 hours) and drying for 24 hours at NTP in shade +No. Zn addition T2- Seed soaking with 4% solution of ZnSo4 (6 hours) and drying for 24 hours at NTP in shade, T3 Seed soaking with 8% solution of ZnSo4 (6 hours) and drying for 24 hours at NTP in shade T4- 26 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing and T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing. These treatments were replicated four time in a randomized block design in different plots. The results of the experiment indicate that significantly higher values of growth parameters (plant populations, plant height, fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, No. of leaves, No. of tillers,). Significantly higher plant height and No. of leaves and No. of Tiller of wheat was recorded is 60 and 90 DAS but 30 DAS were non-significantly effect with treatment T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) over rest of the treatments except T4 (26 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing). Application of T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) recorded maximum No. of leaves, No. of tillers which was significantly higher over rest of the treatments except T4 (26 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) during both the years experimentations. Fresh shoot and Dry shoot accumulation at 30 DAS was not significantly influenced by micro different nutrient management options with applications Zn. Which, application of T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) recorded maximum fresh shoot and dry shoot weight at 60 and 90 DAS which was superior over rest of the treatments except T4 (26 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) on pooled basis and yield attributes (No. of productive tillers, length of spick No. of grain spick, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, harvest index and test weight) of wheat were recorded significantly Superior performance of growth and yield attributes resulted in T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing significant enhancement in grain, straw and biological yield. The wheat is maximum recorded 40.63, 41.86 and 41.25 grain yield and 58.59,59.88 and 59.24 straw yield and biological yield 99.22,101.74 and 100.48 q ha-1 higher with both year, of the experimentations respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased wheat height, leaf number and tiller number at 60 and 90 DAS over most treatments other than T4.

Treatment
T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing)e0
Outcome
plant height and No. of leaves and No. of Tillere0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
60 and 90 DASe0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher plant height and No. of leaves and No. of Tiller of wheat was recorded is 60 and 90 DAS but 30 DAS were non-significantly effect with treatment T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) over rest of the treatments except T4 (26 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 DAS the T5 effect on wheat height, leaves and tillers was not significant.

Treatment
T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing)e0
Outcome
plant height and No. of leaves and No. of Tillere0
Qualifier
30 DASe0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher plant height and No. of leaves and No. of Tiller of wheat was recorded is 60 and 90 DAS but 30 DAS were non-significantly effect with treatment T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) over rest of the treatments except T4 (26 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 yielded maximum leaf and tiller numbers in both years, significantly higher than treatments except T4.

Treatment
T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing)e0
Outcome
No. of leaves, No. of tillerse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) recorded maximum No. of leaves, No. of tillers which was significantly higher over rest of the treatments except T4 (26 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) during both the years experimentations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2191 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc nutrient management did not significantly affect fresh or dry shoot accumulation at 30 DAS.

Treatment
applications Zne0
Outcome
Fresh shoot and Dry shoot accumulatione0
Qualifier
at 30 DASe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh shoot and Dry shoot accumulation at 30 DAS was not significantly influenced by micro different nutrient management options with applications Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2192–2342 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave maximum fresh and dry shoot weight at 60 and 90 DAS, superior to treatments except T4.

Treatment
T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing)e0
Outcome
fresh shoot and dry shoot weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
at 60 and 90 DASe0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Which, application of T5 (28 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) recorded maximum fresh shoot and dry shoot weight at 60 and 90 DAS which was superior over rest of the treatments except T4 (26 kg of ZnSO4/ ha. As basal before sowing) on pooled basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2343–2597 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 significantly improved wheat No. of productive tillers.

Treatment
T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowinge0
Outcome
No. of productive tillerse0
Direction
Superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes (No. of productive tillers, length of spick No. of grain spick, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, harvest index and test weight) of wheat were recorded significantly Superior performance of growth and yield attributes resulted in T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing significant enhancement in grain, straw and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 significantly improved wheat length of spick.

Treatment
T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowinge0
Outcome
length of spicke0
Direction
Superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes (No. of productive tillers, length of spick No. of grain spick, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, harvest index and test weight) of wheat were recorded significantly Superior performance of growth and yield attributes resulted in T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing significant enhancement in grain, straw and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 significantly improved wheat No. of grain spick.

Treatment
T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowinge0
Outcome
No. of grain spicke0
Direction
Superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes (No. of productive tillers, length of spick No. of grain spick, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, harvest index and test weight) of wheat were recorded significantly Superior performance of growth and yield attributes resulted in T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing significant enhancement in grain, straw and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 significantly improved wheat grain yield.

Treatment
T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes (No. of productive tillers, length of spick No. of grain spick, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, harvest index and test weight) of wheat were recorded significantly Superior performance of growth and yield attributes resulted in T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing significant enhancement in grain, straw and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 significantly improved wheat straw yield.

Treatment
T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowinge0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes (No. of productive tillers, length of spick No. of grain spick, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, harvest index and test weight) of wheat were recorded significantly Superior performance of growth and yield attributes resulted in T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing significant enhancement in grain, straw and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 significantly improved wheat biological yield.

Treatment
T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowinge0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes (No. of productive tillers, length of spick No. of grain spick, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, harvest index and test weight) of wheat were recorded significantly Superior performance of growth and yield attributes resulted in T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing significant enhancement in grain, straw and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 significantly improved wheat harvest index.

Treatment
T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowinge0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
Superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes (No. of productive tillers, length of spick No. of grain spick, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, harvest index and test weight) of wheat were recorded significantly Superior performance of growth and yield attributes resulted in T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing significant enhancement in grain, straw and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 significantly improved wheat test weight.

Treatment
T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowinge0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
Superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes (No. of productive tillers, length of spick No. of grain spick, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, harvest index and test weight) of wheat were recorded significantly Superior performance of growth and yield attributes resulted in T5 28 kg of ZnSo4/ ha. As basal before sowing significant enhancement in grain, straw and biological yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2966 · show in text ↑

arsenic atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

15 papers: 3 positive, 12 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

zinc sulfate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

arsenic atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.