Abstract
Aims: To determine the efficacy of chemicals/bioagents against foliar diseases of mungbean. Study Design: Randomized Block Design (Field experiments) Place and Duration of the Study: Field experiments were conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Mandor, Jodhpur during the Kharif 2022 & Kharif 2023 Methodology: Different novel fungicides/bioagents were applied against foliar diseases of mungbean. Ten treatments viz; soil application with Trichoderma harzianum @ 5kg/ha enriched in 100 kg of FYM., seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum @ 10g/kg seed, foliar spray of Trichoderma harzianum @ 2g/l, foliar spray of carbendazim 50% WP @ 0.1%, foliar spray of difenoconazole 25 EC @ 0.1 %, foliar spray of tebuconazole 250 EC @ 0.1%, foliar spray of tebuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% WG @ 0.1%, foliar spray of pyraclostrobin 133g/l+ epoxiconazole 50 g/l w/w SE @ 0.15%, foliar spray of azoxystrobin 18.2 % + difenoconazole 11.4 % SC @ 0.1%, and control (untreated) were taken in study. The diseases assessment was done after 10 days of spraying and percent disease incidence was calculated. Results: Foliar spray of tebuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% WG @ 0.1% was most effective in reducing the anthracnose PDI (19.41%) and cercospora leaf spot (18.26%) followed by foliar spray of azoxystrobin 18.2 % + difenoconazole 11.4 % SC @ 0.1% (24.36 and 21.05 %). Conclusion: Among all the tested treatments, foliar spray of tebuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% WG @ 0.1% was most effective followed by foliar spray of azoxystrobin 18.2 % + difenoconazole 11.4 % SC @ 0.1% in managing both the diseases.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Tebuconazole plus trifloxystrobin was most effective against mungbean anthracnose, with PDI 19.41%.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- Foliar spray of tebuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% WG @ 0.1%e0
- Outcome
- anthracnose PDIe0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 19.41%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Foliar spray of tebuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% WG @ 0.1% was most effective in reducing the anthracnose PDI (19.41%)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Tebuconazole plus trifloxystrobin was most effective against mungbean cercospora leaf spot, with PDI 18.26%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Foliar spray of tebuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% WG @ 0.1%e0
- Outcome
- cercospora leaf spote0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 18.26%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar spray of tebuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% WG @ 0.1% was most effective in reducing the anthracnose PDI (19.41%) and cercospora leaf spot (18.26%)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Azoxystrobin plus difenoconazole ranked second against mungbean anthracnose, with PDI 24.36%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- foliar spray of azoxystrobin 18.2 % + difenoconazole 11.4 % SC @ 0.1%e0
- Outcome
- anthracnose PDIe1
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 24.36e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by foliar spray of azoxystrobin 18.2 % + difenoconazole 11.4 % SC @ 0.1% (24.36 and 21.05 %)”
t0“Mungbean”
e1“anthracnose PDI”
Claim · model-written summary
Azoxystrobin plus difenoconazole ranked second against mungbean cercospora leaf spot, with PDI 21.05%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- foliar spray of azoxystrobin 18.2 % + difenoconazole 11.4 % SC @ 0.1%e0
- Outcome
- cercospora leaf spote1
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 21.05 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by foliar spray of azoxystrobin 18.2 % + difenoconazole 11.4 % SC @ 0.1% (24.36 and 21.05 %)”
t0“Mungbean”
e1“cercospora leaf spot”
The same questions in other papers
trifloxystrobin · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
azoxystrobin · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
tebuconazole · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.