Paper · 2022 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Evaluation of fungicides and bacterial antagonists for management of Corynespora leaf spot on mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)

Narendra K. Bairwa; Prashant P. Jambhulkar; V. Sushmitha; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To minimize losses likely to occur due to Corynespora leaf spot, systemic and contact fungicides and formulation of bacterial antagonists like Bacillus subtilis DTBS-5, B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11, and Pseudomonas fluorescens DTPF-3 talc-based formulations were evaluated to manage the disease. Though mancozeb has the lowest EC50 value of 1250.54 ppm it was not efficient in the field experiment. In addition, dual culture assay to determine the efficacy of bacterial antagonists against C. cassiicola, B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11 effectiovely reduced growth of C. cassiicola. In the field experiments conducted during Kharif 2019 and 2020, two sprays with Azoxystrobin 23 SC@ 0.5 ml lit−1 were found most effective in reducing disease severity by 57.7% and 67.7% respectively during Kharif 2019 and 2020. Azoxystrobin 23 SC treatment resulted in a maximum increase of 281.5 kg in grain yield followed by Pseudomonas fluorescens DTPF-3 264.7 kg and Bacillus subtilis DTBS-5 248.9 kg yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb had the lowest EC50 value of 1250.54 ppm, although it was not efficient in the field.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
mancozebe1
Outcome
EC50 valuee1
Direction
loweste1
Value
1250.54 ppme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Though mancozeb has the lowest EC50 value of 1250.54 ppm it was not efficient in the field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb was not efficient in the field experiment against Corynespora leaf spot of mungbean.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
mancozebe1
Outcome
efficiente1
Direction
not efficiente1
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Though mancozeb has the lowest EC50 value of 1250.54 ppm it was not efficient in the field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11 reduced the growth of Corynespora cassiicola in dual culture.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11e2
Interactor
C. cassiicolaCorynespora cassiicolae2pathogen
Second interactor
B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11Bacillus amyloliquefaciense2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of C. cassiicolae2
Direction
reducede2
Setting
dual culture assaye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Corynespora cassiicola
Corynespora cassiicola · InteractorDr. Ken Pernezny, Gary Vallad, Abraham Fulmer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“dual culture assay to determine the efficacy of bacterial antagonists against C. cassiicola, B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11 effectiovely reduced growth of C. cassiicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of Azoxystrobin 23 SC reduced disease severity by 57.7% during Kharif 2019.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
two sprays with Azoxystrobin 23 SC@ 0.5 ml lit−1e3
Outcome
disease severitye3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
57.7%e3
Setting
Kharif 2019e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“two sprays with Azoxystrobin 23 SC@ 0.5 ml lit−1 were found most effective in reducing disease severity by 57.7% and 67.7% respectively during Kharif 2019 and 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of Azoxystrobin 23 SC reduced disease severity by 67.7% in the second season.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
two sprays with Azoxystrobin 23 SC@ 0.5 ml lit−1e3
Outcome
disease severitye3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
67.7%e3
Qualifier
respectivelye3
Setting
Kharif 2019 and 2020e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“two sprays with Azoxystrobin 23 SC@ 0.5 ml lit−1 were found most effective in reducing disease severity by 57.7% and 67.7% respectively during Kharif 2019 and 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin 23 SC gave a maximum grain yield increase of 281.5 kg.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Azoxystrobin 23 SCe4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
281.5 kge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“Azoxystrobin 23 SC treatment resulted in a maximum increase of 281.5 kg in grain yield followed by Pseudomonas fluorescens DTPF-3 264.7 kg and Bacillus subtilis DTBS-5 248.9 kg yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens DTPF-3 increased grain yield to 264.7 kg.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens DTPF-3e4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
264.7 kge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“Azoxystrobin 23 SC treatment resulted in a maximum increase of 281.5 kg in grain yield followed by Pseudomonas fluorescens DTPF-3 264.7 kg and Bacillus subtilis DTBS-5 248.9 kg yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis DTBS-5 increased grain yield to 248.9 kg.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis DTBS-5e4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
248.9 kge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“Azoxystrobin 23 SC treatment resulted in a maximum increase of 281.5 kg in grain yield followed by Pseudomonas fluorescens DTPF-3 264.7 kg and Bacillus subtilis DTBS-5 248.9 kg yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–991 · show in text ↑

azoxystrobin · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

azoxystrobin · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.