Paper · 2026 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma harzianum Reshape Rhizosphere Microbiome and Reprogram Root Transcriptome to Promote Mungbean Growth Under Continuous-Cropping Conditions

Xinyue Liu; Yuting Chen; Xintong Zhou; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mungbean (Vigna radiata) is an important cash crop, yet the production is significantly compromised by continuous cropping. Beneficial microbial inoculation offers a promising strategy to alleviate the stresses through rhizosphere modulation and host physiological reprogramming. This study evaluated the efficacy of two biological control agents, Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) and Trichoderma harzianum (T. harzianum), in promoting mungbean growth under continuous-cropping conditions. Both individual applications of B. subtilis and T. harzianum significantly improved plant biomass, root system architecture, and yield. Combined metagenomic and transcriptomic analyses were conducted to unravel the underlying mechanisms. According to metagenomic analysis, both B. subtilis and T. harzianum were responsible for significant changes in beta diversity without significantly affecting the alpha diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community. T. harzianum recruited Chitinophagaceae unclassified, Abditibacterium, Hydrogenophilaceae unclassified, Methylophilaceae unclassified, and Chimaeribacter, while Bs recruited Candidatus Saccharibacteria unclassified. Transcriptomic analysis indicated that T. harzianum induced more extensive transcriptional reprogramming than B. subtilis. The enrichment analysis revealed both shared and distinct responses triggered by the two treatments. These findings suggest that B. subtilis and T. harzianum alleviate continuous-cropping stress through distinct yet complementary mechanisms involving rhizosphere microbiome modulation and mungbean transcriptional reprogramming. This study provides a sustainable strategy for legume cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis improved biomass, root architecture and yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat1
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant biomass, root system architecture, and yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both individual applications of B. subtilis and T. harzianum significantly improved plant biomass, root system architecture, and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–624 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum improved biomass, root architecture and yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat1
Treatment
T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant biomass, root system architecture, and yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both individual applications of B. subtilis and T. harzianum significantly improved plant biomass, root system architecture, and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–624 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both inoculants changed rhizosphere beta diversity significantly.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat1
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
beta diversitye0
Direction
changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both B. subtilis and T. harzianum were responsible for significant changes in beta diversity without significantly affecting the alpha diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–946 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither inoculant significantly affected rhizosphere alpha diversity.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat1
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
alpha diversity of the rhizosphere microbial communitye0
Direction
without significantly affectinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both B. subtilis and T. harzianum were responsible for significant changes in beta diversity without significantly affecting the alpha diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–946 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum recruited five named microbial groups.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat1
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
recruited Chitinophagaceae unclassified, Abditibacterium, Hydrogenophilaceae unclassified, Methylophilaceae unclassified, and Chimaeribactere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum recruited Chitinophagaceae unclassified, Abditibacterium, Hydrogenophilaceae unclassified, Methylophilaceae unclassified, and Chimaeribacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bs recruited Candidatus Saccharibacteria unclassified.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat1
Interactor
Bse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
recruited Candidatus Saccharibacteria unclassifiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bs recruited Candidatus Saccharibacteria unclassified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1161 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum induced more extensive transcriptional reprogramming than B. subtilis.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat1
Treatment
T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
transcriptional reprogramminge0
Direction
more extensivee0
Comparator
B. subtilise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum induced more extensive transcriptional reprogramming than B. subtilis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1285 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two inoculants triggered shared and distinct enrichment responses.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat1
Outcome
shared and distinct responsese0
Qualifier
two treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enrichment analysis revealed both shared and distinct responses triggered by the two treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1386 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–127 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.