Paper · 2024 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition

H.J. Senjaliya; K.D. Patel; H.N. Patel; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out at Hi-tech Horticulture Park, college of Horticulture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during the year 2021-22 to 2022-23 to study the response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition.The experiment was laid out Completely Randomized Design with factorial conceptwith three replications. The study included four nutrient levels, viz., 100 % RDF + 20 t/ha FYM, 100 % RDF + 5 t/ha FYM + 1 t/ha Neem cake + Bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 %, 75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + Bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % and 50 % RDF + 15 t/ha FYM + 3 t/ha Neem cake + Bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ ha) + Panchgavya 3 % and four level of training system namely no training, single stem, two stem and three stem. The different level of INM indicated that the treatment 75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % recorded significant superior results on days to first flower appearance, number of flower per cluster, days to fruit set, fruit set per cent, flowering span, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per 1000 m2. The training system indicated that the two stem training reported superior results on number of flower per cluster, fruit yield per plant, fruit yield per 1000 m2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % was superior for days to first flower appearance

Treatment
75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 %e0
Outcome
days to first flower appearancee0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
greenhouse conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The different level of INM indicated that the treatment 75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % recorded significant superior results on days to first flower appearance, number of flower per cluster, days to fruit set, fruit set per cent, flowering span, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per 1000 m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % was superior for number of flower per cluster

Treatment
75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 %e0
Outcome
number of flower per clustere0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
greenhouse conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The different level of INM indicated that the treatment 75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % recorded significant superior results on days to first flower appearance, number of flower per cluster, days to fruit set, fruit set per cent, flowering span, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per 1000 m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % was superior for days to fruit set

Treatment
75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 %e0
Outcome
days to fruit sete0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
greenhouse conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The different level of INM indicated that the treatment 75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % recorded significant superior results on days to first flower appearance, number of flower per cluster, days to fruit set, fruit set per cent, flowering span, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per 1000 m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % was superior for fruit set per cent

Treatment
75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 %e0
Outcome
fruit set per cente0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
greenhouse conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The different level of INM indicated that the treatment 75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % recorded significant superior results on days to first flower appearance, number of flower per cluster, days to fruit set, fruit set per cent, flowering span, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per 1000 m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % was superior for flowering span

Treatment
75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 %e0
Outcome
flowering spane0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
greenhouse conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The different level of INM indicated that the treatment 75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % recorded significant superior results on days to first flower appearance, number of flower per cluster, days to fruit set, fruit set per cent, flowering span, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per 1000 m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % was superior for fruit yield per plant

Treatment
75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 %e0
Outcome
fruit yield per plante0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
greenhouse conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The different level of INM indicated that the treatment 75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % recorded significant superior results on days to first flower appearance, number of flower per cluster, days to fruit set, fruit set per cent, flowering span, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per 1000 m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % was superior for fruit yield per 1000 m2

Treatment
75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 %e0
Outcome
fruit yield per 1000 m2e0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
greenhouse conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The different level of INM indicated that the treatment 75 % RDF + 10 t/ha FYM + 2 t/ha Neem cake + bio-fertilizer (each 3 kg/ha) + Panchgavya 3 % recorded significant superior results on days to first flower appearance, number of flower per cluster, days to fruit set, fruit set per cent, flowering span, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per 1000 m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two stem training was superior for number of flower per cluster

Treatment
two stem traininge0
Outcome
number of flower per clustere0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
greenhouse conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The training system indicated that the two stem training reported superior results on number of flower per cluster, fruit yield per plant, fruit yield per 1000 m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two stem training was superior for fruit yield per plant

Treatment
two stem traininge0
Outcome
fruit yield per plante0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
greenhouse conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The training system indicated that the two stem training reported superior results on number of flower per cluster, fruit yield per plant, fruit yield per 1000 m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two stem training was superior for fruit yield per 1000 m2

Treatment
two stem traininge0
Outcome
fruit yield per 1000 m2e0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
greenhouse conditiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The training system indicated that the two stem training reported superior results on number of flower per cluster, fruit yield per plant, fruit yield per 1000 m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of INM and training on flowering and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 41 positive, 7 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

botanical · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

138 papers: 126 positive, 12 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

134 papers more in this group

See all 138 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

botanical · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.