Paper · 2024 · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture

Evaluating the impact of biogenic nanoparticles and pesticide application in controlling cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Usman Shafqat; Muhammad Ussama Yasin; Muhammad Shahid; et al.

20
claims
49
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD) is one of the major concerns for cotton growers. The traditional approach to managing CLCuD involves the control of the vector (whitefly) population through the use of pesticides. This study compares the efficacy of zinc oxide, iron oxide, copper and silver nanoparticles with conventional pesticides. Nanoparticles dose was optimized by evaluating their phytotoxic threshold in our previous study. In this study, optimized doses of nanoparticles such as zinc oxide (100 ppm), iron oxide (50 ppm), copper (50 ppm) and silver nanoparticles (25 ppm) were applied in a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD). Morphological parameters (height of stem, monopodial branches, sympodial branches, staple length, boll weight and number of bolls), yield parameters (seed cotton yield and ginning outturn), chlorophyll content (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids and total chlorophyll), biochemical parameters (superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and electrolyte leakage) and disease parameters (reduction infection, disease severity and disease incidence) were determined in this study. The incidence of cotton leaf curl virus was confirmed by triple antibody sandwich–enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TAS-ELISA). The pesticide Imidacloprid significantly reduced the infection by 79.3%. However, in comparison to pesticide, application of nanoparticles also reduced the infection. ZnO NPs reduced the infection by 42.33%, FeO NPs by 41%, Cu NPs by 34.7%, and Ag NPs by 44.8%. Moreover, these nanoparticles also improved the plant growth parameters as compared to control treatment. ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively. FeO NPs showed improvements by 38%, 21%, and 29%; Cu NPs 39%, 25%, and 29%; and Ag NPs 31%, 19%, and 18%, respectively. Although treatment pesticide showed the least disease incidence compared to nanoparticles, nanoparticles are eco-friendly and safe as compared to pesticides. Farmers can apply these nanoparticles at their optimal thresholds through foliar application as an alternative to traditional pesticides. It is concluded that nanocomposites and hybrid modes may be used for managing CLCuD efficiently in the future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid significantly reduced cotton leaf curl virus infection by 79.3%.

Treatment
pesticide Imidaclopride3
Interactor
cotton leaf curl virusCotton leaf curl viruse2pathogen
Outcome
infectione3
Direction
reducede3
Value
79.3%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e3

“The pesticide Imidacloprid significantly reduced the infection by 79.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles reduced cotton leaf curl virus infection by 42.33%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse1
Interactor
cotton leaf curl virusCotton leaf curl viruse2pathogen
Outcome
infectione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
42.33%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnO NPs reduced the infection by 42.33%, FeO NPs by 41%, Cu NPs by 34.7%, and Ag NPs by 44.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeO nanoparticles reduced cotton leaf curl virus infection by 41%.

Treatment
FeO NPse1
Interactor
cotton leaf curl virusCotton leaf curl viruse2pathogen
Outcome
infectione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
41%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnO NPs reduced the infection by 42.33%, FeO NPs by 41%, Cu NPs by 34.7%, and Ag NPs by 44.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanoparticles reduced cotton leaf curl virus infection by 34.7%.

Treatment
Cu NPse1
Interactor
cotton leaf curl virusCotton leaf curl viruse2pathogen
Outcome
infectione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
34.7%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnO NPs reduced the infection by 42.33%, FeO NPs by 41%, Cu NPs by 34.7%, and Ag NPs by 44.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver nanoparticles reduced cotton leaf curl virus infection by 44.8%.

Treatment
Ag NPse1
Interactor
cotton leaf curl virusCotton leaf curl viruse2pathogen
Outcome
infectione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
44.8%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnO NPs reduced the infection by 42.33%, FeO NPs by 41%, Cu NPs by 34.7%, and Ag NPs by 44.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pesticide treatment showed the least disease incidence compared with nanoparticles.

Treatment
treatment pesticidee5
Interactor
cotton leaf curl virusCotton leaf curl viruse2pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee5
Direction
leaste5
Comparator
nanoparticlese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e5

“Although treatment pesticide showed the least disease incidence compared to nanoparticles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1959–2048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles improved cotton plant growth parameters compared with control treatment.

Treatment
these nanoparticlese6
Outcome
plant growth parameterse6
Direction
improvede6
Comparator
control treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e6

“these nanoparticles also improved the plant growth parameters as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles enhanced morphological parameters of cotton by 36%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse7
Outcome
morphologicale7
Direction
enhancede7
Value
36%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles enhanced yield parameters of cotton by 22%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse7
Outcome
yield parameterse7
Direction
enhancede7
Value
22%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles enhanced chlorophyll content of cotton by 29%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse7
Outcome
chlorophyll contente7
Direction
enhancede7
Value
29%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeO nanoparticles improved morphological parameters of cotton by 38%.

Treatment
FeO NPse1
Outcome
morphologicale7
Direction
improvementse1
Value
38%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“FeO NPs showed improvements by 38%, 21%, and 29%; Cu NPs 39%, 25%, and 29%; and Ag NPs 31%, 19%, and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeO nanoparticles improved yield parameters of cotton by 21%.

Treatment
FeO NPse1
Outcome
yield parameterse7
Direction
improvementse1
Value
21%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“FeO NPs showed improvements by 38%, 21%, and 29%; Cu NPs 39%, 25%, and 29%; and Ag NPs 31%, 19%, and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeO nanoparticles improved chlorophyll content of cotton by 29%.

Treatment
FeO NPse1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente7
Direction
improvementse1
Value
29%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“FeO NPs showed improvements by 38%, 21%, and 29%; Cu NPs 39%, 25%, and 29%; and Ag NPs 31%, 19%, and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanoparticles improved morphological parameters of cotton by 39%.

Treatment
Cu NPse1
Outcome
morphologicale7
Direction
improvementse1
Value
39%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“FeO NPs showed improvements by 38%, 21%, and 29%; Cu NPs 39%, 25%, and 29%; and Ag NPs 31%, 19%, and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanoparticles improved yield parameters of cotton by 25%.

Treatment
Cu NPse1
Outcome
yield parameterse7
Direction
improvementse1
Value
25%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“FeO NPs showed improvements by 38%, 21%, and 29%; Cu NPs 39%, 25%, and 29%; and Ag NPs 31%, 19%, and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanoparticles improved chlorophyll content of cotton by 29%.

Treatment
Cu NPse1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente7
Direction
improvementse1
Value
29%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“FeO NPs showed improvements by 38%, 21%, and 29%; Cu NPs 39%, 25%, and 29%; and Ag NPs 31%, 19%, and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver nanoparticles improved morphological parameters of cotton by 31%.

Treatment
Ag NPse1
Outcome
morphologicale7
Direction
improvementse1
Value
31%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“FeO NPs showed improvements by 38%, 21%, and 29%; Cu NPs 39%, 25%, and 29%; and Ag NPs 31%, 19%, and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver nanoparticles improved yield parameters of cotton by 19%.

Treatment
Ag NPse1
Outcome
yield parameterse7
Direction
improvementse1
Value
19%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“FeO NPs showed improvements by 38%, 21%, and 29%; Cu NPs 39%, 25%, and 29%; and Ag NPs 31%, 19%, and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver nanoparticles improved chlorophyll content of cotton by 18%.

Treatment
Ag NPse1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente7
Direction
improvementse1
Value
18%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e7

“ZnO NPs enhanced morphological, yield parameters, and chlorophyll content by 36%, 22%, and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“FeO NPs showed improvements by 38%, 21%, and 29%; Cu NPs 39%, 25%, and 29%; and Ag NPs 31%, 19%, and 18%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1957 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar application of these nanoparticles at optimal thresholds as an alternative to traditional pesticides.

Outcome
apply these nanoparticles at their optimal thresholds through foliar applicatione1
Qualifier
as an alternative to traditional pesticidese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a field trial of cotton against cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
e1

“Farmers can apply these nanoparticles at their optimal thresholds through foliar application as an alternative to traditional pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2117–2253 · show in text ↑

silver nanoparticle · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc oxide · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc oxide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

copper atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.