Paper · 2024 · Scientific Reports

Nano-enhanced storage of American cotton using metal-oxide nanoparticles for improving seed quality traits

Nirmal Singh; Axay Bhuker; Vineeta Pandey; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Cotton seeds have poorer germination than other crops because of their high sensitivity towards insect pests and other biotic and abiotic stresses during the germination process. In the present study, inorganic bulk and nano nutrients of zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium oxide (TiO 2 ) nanoparticles were synthesized using the chemical reduction method and invigourated with cotton seeds. The characterization of nanoparticles was done by FESEM, HRTEM, UV/Vis analysis and FTIR. The delinted and fuzzy seeds of two American cotton varieties (H 1300 and H 1098-i) were nano-primed for 10 h with zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) @ 400 ppm and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO 2 NPs) @ 100 ppm. After nanoparticle invigouration, the seeds were analyzed for various parameters at different intervals (0 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months) such as germination percentage, seedling length, seedling dry weight, electrical conductivity, dehydrogenase activity, antioxidant enzyme activity. The results indicated that that different storage periods and nanopriming treatments had significant effects on all seed quality parameters except the effect of nanopriming treatments on germination percentage (excluding delinted seeds of H 1098-i). It is also revealed that the interaction effect of nanopriming treatment and storage period was non-significant on all parameters except EC. Maximum reduction in seed quality parameters was observed in control treatment and minimum was found when seeds were nanoprimed with ZnONPs @ 400 ppm. The differences in the response for both NPs can be attributed to their surface charge, and concentration used. Overall, ZnONPs and TiO 2 NPs could hold seed quality and vigour during the storage of cotton seeds of American varieties (H 1300 and H 1098-i).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage periods significantly affected seed quality parameters except as qualified in the abstract.

Taxon
American cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
seed quality parameterse0
Setting
storage periodse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“American cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“different storage periods and nanopriming treatments had significant effects on all seed quality parameters except the effect of nanopriming treatments on germination percentage (excluding delinted seeds of H 1098-i)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanopriming significantly affected seed quality parameters other than germination percentage, with the stated exception.

Taxon
American cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
nanopriming treatmentse0
Outcome
seed quality parameterse0
Qualifier
excluding delinted seeds of H 1098-ie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“American cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“different storage periods and nanopriming treatments had significant effects on all seed quality parameters except the effect of nanopriming treatments on germination percentage (excluding delinted seeds of H 1098-i)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanopriming did not significantly affect germination percentage except in delinted H 1098-i seeds.

Taxon
American cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
nanopriming treatmentse0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Qualifier
excluding delinted seeds of H 1098-ie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“American cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“except the effect of nanopriming treatments on germination percentage (excluding delinted seeds of H 1098-i)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1248 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of nanopriming and storage period was nonsignificant for parameters other than electrical conductivity.

Taxon
American cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
nanopriming treatmente0
Outcome
all parameters except ECe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“American cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction effect of nanopriming treatment and storage period was non-significant on all parameters except EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1389 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nanopriming by storage interaction affected EC.

Taxon
American cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
nanopriming treatmente0
Outcome
ECe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“American cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction effect of nanopriming treatment and storage period was non-significant on all parameters except EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1389 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control seeds showed the greatest reduction in seed quality parameters.

Taxon
American cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
seed quality parameterse0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“American cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum reduction in seed quality parameters was observed in control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds primed with 400 ppm ZnONPs showed the smallest reduction in seed quality parameters.

Taxon
American cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
nanoprimed with ZnONPs @ 400 ppme0
Outcome
seed quality parameterse1
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“American cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“minimum was found when seeds were nanoprimed with ZnONPs @ 400 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1540 · show in text ↑
e1

“different storage periods and nanopriming treatments had significant effects on all seed quality parameters except the effect of nanopriming treatments on germination percentage (excluding delinted seeds of H 1098-i)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1248 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnONPs and TiO 2 NPs could preserve cotton seed quality and vigour during storage.

Taxon
American cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
seed quality and vigoure0
Qualifier
H 1300 and H 1098-ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“American cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“ZnONPs and TiO 2 NPs could hold seed quality and vigour during the storage of cotton seeds of American varieties (H 1300 and H 1098-i)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1797 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.