Paper · 2024 · Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - REVENG

Seed and grain yield and quality of wheat subjected to advanced harvest using a physiological ripening process

Eric Jair Rigotti; Ivan Ricardo Carvalho; Murilo Vieira Loro; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the yield performance, physiological and nutritional quality of wheat seeds and grains subjected to times of application of a physiological ripening agent in pre-harvest. The experiment was arranged in a randomized block design and the treatments were six times of application of the physiological process of ripening in three replications. The applications were carried out at the ealy milk stage, milk stage, early dough stage, soft dough stage, hard dough stage and a control with no application. Yield, nutritional characteristics and the physiological quality of the seeds were evaluated. Analysis of variance and the Skott Knott test were performed at 5% probability. Linear correlation coefficients between pairs of traits were calculated. The application of the physiological process of ripening from the soft dough stage did not affect wheat grain yield. Wheat seed germination was not impacted when the physiological process of ripening was applied from the hard dough stage. The use of the ripening agent reduced the vigor of wheat seeds, regardless of the time of application. The presence of protein in grains was not influenced by the application of the physiological ripening agent. Starch had the greatest expression when the physiological process of ripening was applied between the milk stage and the early dough stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripening from soft dough stage did not affect grain yield.

Organ / stage
soft dough stagee0
Treatment
physiological process of ripeninge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the physiological process of ripening from the soft dough stage did not affect wheat grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripening from hard dough stage did not affect germination.

Organ / stage
hard dough stagee0
Treatment
physiological process of ripeninge0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
not impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat seed germination was not impacted when the physiological process of ripening was applied from the hard dough stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripening agent reduced seed vigor at all application times.

Treatment
ripening agente0
Outcome
vigor of wheat seedse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
regardless of the time of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the ripening agent reduced the vigor of wheat seeds, regardless of the time of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripening agent did not influence grain protein.

Treatment
physiological ripening agente0
Outcome
protein in grainse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“The presence of protein in grains was not influenced by the application of the physiological ripening agent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch was greatest with ripening applied between milk and early dough stages.

Treatment
physiological process of ripeninge0
Outcome
Starche0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
between the milk stage and the early dough stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Starch had the greatest expression when the physiological process of ripening was applied between the milk stage and the early dough stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1366 · show in text ↑

stage · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

stage · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

stage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 24 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.