Paper · 2002 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Winter Wheat: Cultivar Differences and Prediction of Grain Protein Content

Bernt Olav Hoel

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Leaves of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were measured with a Hydro N-Tester (HNT), a portable chlorophyll meter, to obtain a relative estimate of leaf chlorophyll content, which gives an indication of plant N-status. The aim was to find if there were differences in HNT values between the winter wheat cultivars investigated, and to assess whether these values could be used for prediction of grain protein content (GPC). In Experiment 1, chlorophyll meter readings were taken at growth stages (GS) Zadoks 31 and 55 in five winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in 17 annual field trials located in southeast Norway in 1996, 1997, and 1998. There were significant differences in HNT values between cultivars at both GS 31 and 55, but no differences were found between the three most commonly used cultivars in Norway at present, cvs. Bjørke, Mjølner and Rudolf. Because of the variation between years the HNT values at GS 55 were found to be unsuitable for direct prediction of the GPC. In Experiment 2, HNT was used in 21 annual N-fertilizer trials with winter wheat, performed in 1996 and 1997 and located in southeast Norway. A delay in the measurements from GS 55 to GS 65 generally improved the GPC prediction in 1996. Nitrogen applied at GS 55 increased GPC by approximately 1 unit of percent in cv. Folke, regardless of HNT value, while in cv. Portal nitrogen applied at this stage gave no increase in GPC at HNT values beyond 700.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HNT values differed significantly among cultivars at GS 31 and 55.

Organ / stage
GS 31 and 55e0
Outcome
HNT valuese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant differences in HNT values between cultivars at both GS 31 and 55”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–742 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HNT values did not differ among Bjørke, Mjølner, and Rudolf.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
cvs. Bjørke, Mjølner and Rudolfe0
Outcome
no differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences were found between the three most commonly used cultivars in Norway at present, cvs. Bjørke, Mjølner and Rudolf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year variation made GS 55 HNT values unsuitable for direct GPC prediction.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
unsuitable for direct prediction of the GPCe0
Comparator
variation between yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because of the variation between years the HNT values at GS 55 were found to be unsuitable for direct prediction of the GPC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying HNT measurements from GS 55 to GS 65 generally improved GPC prediction in 1996.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
GPC predictione0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
GS 55e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A delay in the measurements from GS 55 to GS 65 generally improved the GPC prediction in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N applied at GS 55 increased GPC by approximately 1 unit of percent in Folke regardless of HNT value.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
cv. Folkee0
Treatment
Nitrogen applied at GS 55e0
Outcome
GPCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
approximately 1 unit of percente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen applied at GS 55 increased GPC by approximately 1 unit of percent in cv. Folke, regardless of HNT value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N applied at GS 55 gave no GPC increase in Portal at HNT values beyond 700.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
cv. Portale0
Treatment
nitrogen applied at this stagee0
Outcome
GPCe0
Direction
no increasee0
Qualifier
HNT values beyond 700e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cv. Portal nitrogen applied at this stage gave no increase in GPC at HNT values beyond 700”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 · show in text ↑

stage · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.