Paper · 2011 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

Effects of sulphur application on grain yield and quality, and assessment of sulphur status in winter wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)

Bernt Olav Hoel

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Winter wheat was grown in 26 field trials in Norway during the period 2004–2006. The main aim was to determine the effect of various sulphur (S) fertilization strategies at two different nitrogen (N) levels on grain yield and quality of winter wheat. With the exception of four trials in central Norway, all the trials were located in the south-eastern part of the country. Increasing the N fertilization from 170 to 210 kg N ha−1 resulted in significantly higher grain protein content (GPC) and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) sedimentation volume. On clayey soils in southeast Norway, increased N-fertilization also resulted in higher grain yield and lower test weight and thousand grain weight (tgw). Omitting S fertilization significantly reduced grain yields on sandy soils in southeast Norway and on loam and silt loam in central Norway, whereas no yield reduction was found on clay soils. SDS sedimentation volume and specific SDS (sSDS = SDS/GPC) were significantly reduced when S-fertilization was omitted. GPC was reduced by S fertilization in central Norway. Generally there were no significant responses at application rates higher than 12 kg S ha−1. The malate:sulphate method is a field-based diagnostic test used to determine whether S deficiency is likely to occur. The results did not indicate that this test is reliable under Norwegian conditions. On the other hand, the use of a chlorophyll meter measurements to assess S status gave promising results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen from 170 to 210 kg N ha−1 significantly raised grain protein content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
210 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
170e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the N fertilization from 170 to 210 kg N ha−1 resulted in significantly higher grain protein content (GPC) and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) sedimentation volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen from 170 to 210 kg N ha−1 significantly raised SDS sedimentation volume.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
210 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) sedimentation volumee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
170e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the N fertilization from 170 to 210 kg N ha−1 resulted in significantly higher grain protein content (GPC) and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) sedimentation volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More nitrogen increased grain yield on clayey soils in southeast Norway.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increased N-fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Setting
clayey soils in southeast Norwaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On clayey soils in southeast Norway, increased N-fertilization also resulted in higher grain yield and lower test weight and thousand grain weight (tgw)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More nitrogen lowered test weight on clayey soils in southeast Norway.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increased N-fertilizatione0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
clayey soils in southeast Norwaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On clayey soils in southeast Norway, increased N-fertilization also resulted in higher grain yield and lower test weight and thousand grain weight (tgw)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More nitrogen lowered thousand grain weight on clayey soils in southeast Norway.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increased N-fertilizatione0
Outcome
thousand grain weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
clayey soils in southeast Norwaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On clayey soils in southeast Norway, increased N-fertilization also resulted in higher grain yield and lower test weight and thousand grain weight (tgw)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting sulphur significantly reduced grain yield on sandy soils in southeast Norway.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Omitting S fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
sandy soils in southeast Norwaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omitting S fertilization significantly reduced grain yields on sandy soils in southeast Norway and on loam and silt loam in central Norway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting sulphur significantly reduced grain yield on loam and silt loam in central Norway.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Omitting S fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
loam and silt loam in central Norwaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omitting S fertilization significantly reduced grain yields on sandy soils in southeast Norway and on loam and silt loam in central Norway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur omission did not reduce yield on clay soils.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sulphur applicationt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no yield reductione0
Setting
clay soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no yield reduction was found on clay soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of sulphur application on grain yield and quality, and assessment of sulphur status in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting sulphur significantly reduced SDS sedimentation volume.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
S-fertilization was omittede0
Outcome
SDS sedimentation volumee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDS sedimentation volume and specific SDS (sSDS = SDS/GPC) were significantly reduced when S-fertilization was omitted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting sulphur significantly reduced specific SDS.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
S-fertilization was omittede0
Outcome
specific SDSe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDS sedimentation volume and specific SDS (sSDS = SDS/GPC) were significantly reduced when S-fertilization was omitted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization reduced grain protein content in central Norway.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
S fertilizatione0
Outcome
GPCe0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
central Norwaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GPC was reduced by S fertilization in central Norway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rates above 12 kg S ha−1 generally produced no significant responses.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
application rates higher than 12 kg S ha−1e0
Outcome
responsese0
Direction
no significant responsese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Generally there were no significant responses at application rates higher than 12 kg S ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The malate:sulphate field diagnostic was unreliable under Norwegian conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
reliablee0
Qualifier
Norwegian conditionse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results did not indicate that this test is reliable under Norwegian conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter measurements showed promise for assessing sulphur status.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
assess S statuse0
Direction
promising resultse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of a chlorophyll meter measurements to assess S status gave promising results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1477 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

96 papers: 70 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 70 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Late soil nitrogen increased common wheat test weight by 1.4%.

    Late‐Season Nitrogen Increases Improver Common and Durum Wheat Quality · 2015 · compared with control without N fertilization after the vegetative growth stage

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

nitrogen · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 31 positive, 10 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 501 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.