Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Omitting sulphur significantly reduced grain yield on sandy soils in southeast Norway.

A claim from Effects of sulphur application on grain yield and quality, and assessment of sulphur status in winter wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting sulphur significantly reduced grain yield on sandy soils in southeast Norway.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Omitting S fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
sandy soils in southeast Norwaye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omitting S fertilization significantly reduced grain yields on sandy soils in southeast Norway and on loam and silt loam in central Norway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–849
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107

Title

Effects of sulphur application on grain yield and quality, and assessment of sulphur status in winter wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)

Bernt Olav Hoel Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2011. doi:10.1080/09064710.2010.510120

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e157a01eb246808d490a457518c38cce464c78ae6c099eb75268547070a7cde9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

139 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.