Paper · 2024 · Plant Science Today

Boosting farm resilience: Integrating vegetables and spices in nutmeg and arecanut agroforestry

S. Gayathiri; Rajalingam G.V; Irene Vethamoni P; et al.

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to develop a suitable intercropping model under a nutmeg and areca nut-based mixed farming system for higher productivity in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu. Coriander cv.CO4, Fenugreek cv.CO2, Okra hybrid Co 4, Cluster beans cv. MDU 1, Vegetable cowpea cv.PKM 1, Lablab (bush type) Co(Gb-16)) and Small onion cv.CO 4 was intercropped under 14-year-old Arecanut and 18-year-old Nutmeg trees. The design followed was RBD with three replications. Results revealed that the growth and yield of intercrops were reduced under intercropping compared to pure cropping. Among the intercrops, okra was the least affected, yielding 19.8t/ha, 7.78% lower than pure cropping. Coriander and fenugreek were the most affected. The yield of coriander and fenugreek was 0.43 and 0.47 t/ha, respectively 24.88% and 25.05% lower than pure cropping. The growth of nutmeg and areca nut trees were also influenced due to intercropping with vegetable cowpeas. The increment in DBH of nutmeg was maximum (0.52 cm) with vegetable cowpea intercropping and minimum (0.33 cm) with coriander intercropping. The increment in DBH of arecanut was maximum (0.42 cm) with vegetable cowpea intercropping and minimum (0.25 cm) with fenugreek intercropping. The B:C ratio was highest (2.17) under small onion intercropping. Small onion cultivation was successful under nutmeg and arecanut-based mixed farming systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra yield under intercropping was 7.78% lower than under pure cropping.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
7.78%e0
Comparator
pure croppinge0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the intercrops, okra was the least affected, yielding 19.8t/ha, 7.78% lower than pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–718 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results revealed that the growth and yield of intercrops were reduced under intercropping compared to pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–616 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra intercrop yielded 19.8 t/ha.

Outcome
yielde0
Value
19.8t/hae0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the intercrops, okra was the least affected, yielding 19.8t/ha, 7.78% lower than pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–718 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coriander yield under intercropping was 24.88% lower than under pure cropping.

Taxon
CorianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
24.88%e0
Comparator
pure croppinge0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coriander and fenugreek were the most affected. The yield of coriander and fenugreek was 0.43 and 0.47 t/ha, respectively 24.88% and 25.05% lower than pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results revealed that the growth and yield of intercrops were reduced under intercropping compared to pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–616 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenugreek yield under intercropping was 25.05% lower than under pure cropping.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
25.05%e0
Comparator
pure croppinge0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coriander and fenugreek were the most affected. The yield of coriander and fenugreek was 0.43 and 0.47 t/ha, respectively 24.88% and 25.05% lower than pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results revealed that the growth and yield of intercrops were reduced under intercropping compared to pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–616 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coriander yield under intercropping was 0.43 t/ha.

Taxon
CorianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
yielde0
Value
0.43e0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coriander and fenugreek were the most affected. The yield of coriander and fenugreek was 0.43 and 0.47 t/ha, respectively 24.88% and 25.05% lower than pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results revealed that the growth and yield of intercrops were reduced under intercropping compared to pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–616 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenugreek yield under intercropping was 0.47 t/ha.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
yielde0
Value
0.47e0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coriander and fenugreek were the most affected. The yield of coriander and fenugreek was 0.43 and 0.47 t/ha, respectively 24.88% and 25.05% lower than pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results revealed that the growth and yield of intercrops were reduced under intercropping compared to pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–616 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield of intercrops were reduced under intercropping compared with pure cropping.

Taxon
intercropse0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
pure croppinge0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that the growth and yield of intercrops were reduced under intercropping compared to pure cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–616 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutmeg DBH increment was maximal (0.52 cm) with vegetable cowpea intercropping.

Treatment
vegetable cowpea intercroppinge0
Outcome
increment in DBHe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.52 cme0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myristica fragrans
Myristica fragrans · TaxonWiki Farazi · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increment in DBH of nutmeg was maximum (0.52 cm) with vegetable cowpea intercropping and minimum (0.33 cm) with coriander intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1132 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutmeg DBH increment was minimal (0.33 cm) with coriander intercropping.

Treatment
coriander intercroppinge0
Outcome
increment in DBHe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.33 cme0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myristica fragrans
Myristica fragrans · TaxonWiki Farazi · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increment in DBH of nutmeg was maximum (0.52 cm) with vegetable cowpea intercropping and minimum (0.33 cm) with coriander intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1132 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arecanut DBH increment was maximal (0.42 cm) with vegetable cowpea intercropping.

Taxon
arecanutAreca catechue0
Treatment
vegetable cowpea intercroppinge0
Outcome
increment in DBHe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.42 cme0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Areca catechu
Areca catechu · TaxonPratheepps · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increment in DBH of arecanut was maximum (0.42 cm) with vegetable cowpea intercropping and minimum (0.25 cm) with fenugreek intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1275 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arecanut DBH increment was minimal (0.25 cm) with fenugreek intercropping.

Taxon
arecanutAreca catechue0
Treatment
fenugreek intercroppinge0
Outcome
increment in DBHe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.25 cme0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Areca catechu
Areca catechu · TaxonPratheepps · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increment in DBH of arecanut was maximum (0.42 cm) with vegetable cowpea intercropping and minimum (0.25 cm) with fenugreek intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1275 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small onion under intercropping had the highest B:C ratio (2.17).

Taxon
small onione0
Treatment
small onion intercroppinge0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.17e0
Setting
Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadue2

Verbatim

e0

“The B:C ratio was highest (2.17) under small onion intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1341 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Thondamuthur region of Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–212 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · yield · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 25 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.