Abstract
Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the bio-efficacy of novel insecticide, Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD 200, 250, 300, 400 g/ha along with two standard checks i.e., Lambda-cyhalothrin 4.9% CS and Fipronil 5% SC @ 2000 ml/ha against sap feeder insect pests infesting pomegranate at KVK, Jhalawar during the years 2021 and 2022. The pomegranate variety Sindhuri was transplanted in a Randomized Block Design with seven treatments with three replications. Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD was equally effective @ 400 and 300 g/ha to control major sap feeder insects like aphid, thrips and whitefly on pomegranate crop and better than other standard treatments. The mean maximum yield of pomegranate was recorded in the treatment of Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD@ 400 g/ha which was 98.20 q/ha and 109.20 q/ha during respective year in comparison to control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD at 400 and 300 g/ha was equally effective in controlling sap feeder insects on pomegranate.
- Taxon
- pomegranate
Punica granatume0 - Treatment
- Cyantraniliprole 10.26% ODe0
- Interactor
- sap feeder insectse0pest
- Outcome
- sap feeder insectse0
- Direction
- equally effectivee0
- Value
- 400 and 300 g/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD was equally effective @ 400 and 300 g/ha to control major sap feeder insects like aphid, thrips and whitefly on pomegranate crop and better than other standard treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD was better than other standard treatments against sap feeder insects on pomegranate.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatume0
- Treatment
- Cyantraniliprole 10.26% ODe0
- Interactor
- sap feeder insectse0pest
- Outcome
- sap feeder insectse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- other standard treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD was equally effective @ 400 and 300 g/ha to control major sap feeder insects like aphid, thrips and whitefly on pomegranate crop and better than other standard treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean maximum pomegranate yield with Cyantraniliprole at 400 g/ha was 98.20 q/ha in the first year, versus control.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatume0
- Treatment
- Cyantraniliprole 10.26% ODe0
- Outcome
- mean maximum yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 98.20 q/hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean maximum yield of pomegranate was recorded in the treatment of Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD@ 400 g/ha which was 98.20 q/ha and 109.20 q/ha during respective year in comparison to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean maximum pomegranate yield with Cyantraniliprole at 400 g/ha was 109.20 q/ha in the second year, versus control.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatume0
- Treatment
- Cyantraniliprole 10.26% ODe0
- Outcome
- mean maximum yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 109.20 q/hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean maximum yield of pomegranate was recorded in the treatment of Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD@ 400 g/ha which was 98.20 q/ha and 109.20 q/ha during respective year in comparison to control”
The same questions in other papers
cyantraniliprole · pest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
cyantraniliprole · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.