Paper · 2024 · HortScience

Evaluating Trichoderma-containing Biofungicide and Grafting for Productivity and Plant Health of Triploid Seedless Watermelon in California’s Commercial Production

Fayrouz Buojaylah; Yaritza Castrejon; Zheng Wang

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out in 2022 and 2023 within commercial watermelon fields in Stockton and Modesto, CA, USA. Two Trichoderma-containing products were applied to the grafted and nongrafted watermelon seedlings through tray soaking or field chemigation. All seedlings were mechanically transplanted into a split-split plot design with the Trichoderma product as the main factor and application method (tray soaking and chemigation) as the sub-plot. The sub-sub-factor included three interspecific hybrid squash rootstocks ( Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata ) ‘Cobalt’, ‘Flexifort’, and ‘RS841’ that were grafted with the commercial seedless watermelon scion ‘Summer Breeze’. All treatments were replicated four times. Vine health was visually assessed three times, and canopy coverage was assessed for a total of six measurements for each year. Harvest was conducted three times in 2022 and twice in 2023 to analyze yield and quality differences among treatments. Aboveground and root samples from defective plants were taken amid the harvest and shipped to the University of California, Davis Fungal Pathology Diagnostics Research Laboratory for identification of soilborne fungal pathogens to confirm or rule out their involvement in vine declines initially attributed to nonpathogenic factors. The laboratory diagnosis indicated that Macrophomina was morphologically identified from the foot and root isolations of 67% of the submitted nongrafted, non-Trichoderma-biofungicide–treated plants in 2022. Further sequencing results confirmed the primary pathogen, Macrophomina phaseolina , from 50% of those submitted plant samples. In addition, putative Fusarium root and stem rot ( Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radices-cucurmerinum ) and Falciforme crown rot and decline ( Fusarium noneumartii ) from runners and roots of nongrafted, noninoculated plants in the 2022 experiment were also reported. However, no significant soilborne fungal pathogens were found in the 2023 experiment. In both trials, the effects of Trichoderma-containing biofungicides and their application methods on preventing vine decline, maintaining canopy coverage, and enhancing fruit yield and quality were not as remarkable as grafting. The average grafting effect contributed to 83% and 53% decrease of vine decline compared with the nongrafted plants in 2022 and 2023. Overall, grafted plants yielded 47.6% and 32.4% more than the nongrafted counterpart in 2022 and 2023, respectively. In addition, grafting exerted predominant influence on fruit firmness and rind thickness. The study results indicated that grafting onto multipathogen resistance watermelon rootstocks serves as an effective production tool to maintain fruit yield, quality, and plant health under both pathogenic and disease-free conditions. Further work is still needed to continue evaluating best practical application protocols of Trichoderma-based biofungicides and other biopesticides to enhance product effectiveness and end users’ confidence in reducing soilborne diseases and reliance on conventional fumigants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrophomina was morphologically identified in 67% of submitted nongrafted, untreated plants in 2022.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
foot and roote0
Interactor
MacrophominaMacrophominae0pathogen
Outcome
Macrophomina was morphologically identifiede0
Value
67%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina
Macrophomina · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Edward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Macrophomina was morphologically identified from the foot and root isolations of 67% of the submitted nongrafted, non-Trichoderma-biofungicide–treated plants in 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequencing confirmed Macrophomina phaseolina in 50% of those submitted samples.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
Macrophomina phaseolinae0
Value
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sequencing results confirmed the primary pathogen, Macrophomina phaseolina , from 50% of those submitted plant samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1650 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putative Fusarium root and stem rot was reported in nongrafted, noninoculated plants in 2022.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radices-cucurmerinumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium root and stem rote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“putative Fusarium root and stem rot ( Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radices-cucurmerinum ) and Falciforme crown rot and decline ( Fusarium noneumartii ) from runners and roots of nongrafted, noninoculated plants in the 2022 experiment were also reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1914 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putative Falciforme crown rot and decline was reported in nongrafted, noninoculated plants in 2022.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
Fusarium noneumartiiFusarium noneumartiie0pathogen
Outcome
Falciforme crown rot and declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Falciforme crown rot and decline ( Fusarium noneumartii ) from runners and roots of nongrafted, noninoculated plants in the 2022 experiment were also reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1914 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant soilborne fungal pathogens were found in the 2023 trial.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
soilborne fungal pathogense0
Setting
2023 experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant soilborne fungal pathogens were found in the 2023 experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–2000 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma products and application methods were less remarkable than grafting for vine decline, canopy cover, fruit yield, and quality.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Trichoderma-containing biofungicidese0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
vine decline, maintaining canopy coverage, and enhancing fruit yield and qualitye0
Direction
not as remarkable ase0
Comparator
graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of Trichoderma-containing biofungicides and their application methods on preventing vine decline, maintaining canopy coverage, and enhancing fruit yield and quality were not as remarkable as grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2018–2229 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting decreased vine decline by 83% in 2022 versus nongrafted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
vine declinee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
83%e0
Comparator
nongrafted plantse0
Setting
2022e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average grafting effect contributed to 83% and 53% decrease of vine decline compared with the nongrafted plants in 2022 and 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2363 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting decreased vine decline by 53% in 2023 versus nongrafted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
vine declinee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
53%e0
Comparator
nongrafted plantse0
Setting
2023e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average grafting effect contributed to 83% and 53% decrease of vine decline compared with the nongrafted plants in 2022 and 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2363 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants yielded 47.6% more than nongrafted plants in 2022.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Value
47.6%e0
Comparator
nongrafted counterparte0
Setting
2022e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafted plants yielded 47.6% and 32.4% more than the nongrafted counterpart in 2022 and 2023, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2374–2480 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants yielded 32.4% more than nongrafted plants in 2023.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Value
32.4%e0
Comparator
nongrafted counterparte0
Setting
2023e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafted plants yielded 47.6% and 32.4% more than the nongrafted counterpart in 2022 and 2023, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2374–2480 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting predominantly influenced fruit firmness and rind thickness.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
fruit firmness and rind thicknesse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafting exerted predominant influence on fruit firmness and rind thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2495–2570 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider grafting onto multipathogen resistant watermelon rootstocks effective for yield, quality, and health under pathogenic and disease-free conditions.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome
grafting onto multipathogen resistance watermelon rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafting onto multipathogen resistance watermelon rootstocks serves as an effective production tool to maintain fruit yield, quality, and plant health under both pathogenic and disease-free conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2605–2805 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.