Paper · 2015 · HortScience

Evaluating Grafted Watermelon for Verticillium Wilt Severity, Yield, and Fruit Quality in Washington State

Jesse Wimer; Debra Inglis; Carol Miles

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae is a serious disease for watermelon growers in Washington State. Grafting represents a possible alternative disease management strategy, but little is known about rootstock resistance to verticillium wilt or the performance of grafted watermelon in the different production regions of the state. In this study, verticillium wilt severity, yield, and fruit quality were evaluated at three contrasting field sites in Washington using verticillium wilt-susceptible ‘Sugar Baby’ (diploid) watermelon grafted onto four commercial rootstock cultivars (Marvel, Rampart, Tetsukabuto, and Titan); nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’ was included as the control. Verticillium dahliae soil densities varied at each site (<1.0, 5.7, and 18.0 colony-forming units (cfu)/g soil at Othello, Eltopia, and Mount Vernon, respectively). Area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) values differed significantly among treatments at Eltopia and Mount Vernon. Nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’ had the highest AUDPC value at all three sites, while ‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Tetsukabuto’ had the lowest AUDPC value at Eltopia and Mount Vernon. Nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’ also had the lowest fruit weight per plant at all sites, but ‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Tetsukabuto’ had the highest fruit weight per plant at Eltopia and Mount Vernon. Marketable fruit weight per plant did not differ among treatments at Othello. Yield was negatively correlated with AUDPC values at both Eltopia and Mount Vernon. Fruit number per plant was only significantly impacted at Eltopia, where ‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Tetsukabuto’ had more fruit per plant than all other treatments except ‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Rampart’. Fruit quality (flesh firmness, total soluble solids, and lycopene content) was unaffected by grafting at either Othello or Eltopia, except for increased flesh firmness for ‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Marvel’ and ‘Titan’ as compared with nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’ at Eltopia. At season’s end, plants were sampled from all treatments at Eltopia and Mount Vernon and assayed for V. dahliae . Microsclerotia typical of this organism were observed in all samples. Results from this study indicate that verticillium wilt of watermelon can be successfully managed by grafting when the V. dahliae soil density exceeds 5.0 cfu/g in Washington. In addition, grafting does not reduce fruit quality and using certain rootstocks can improve the quality of flesh firmness at certain locations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. dahliae soil density differed across the three sites.

Taxon
Verticillium dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee0
Outcome
soil densitiese0
Setting
Othello, Eltopia, and Mount Vernone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · TaxonHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Verticillium dahliae soil densities varied at each site (<1.0, 5.7, and 18.0 colony-forming units (cfu)/g soil at Othello, Eltopia, and Mount Vernon, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–853 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AUDPC differed significantly among treatments at Eltopia and Mount Vernon.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
Area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) valuese0
Setting
Eltopia and Mount Vernone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) values differed significantly among treatments at Eltopia and Mount Vernon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nongrafted Sugar Baby had the highest AUDPC at all three sites.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
‘Sugar Baby’e0
Outcome
AUDPC valuee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’ had the highest AUDPC value at all three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar Baby on Tetsukabuto had the lowest AUDPC at Eltopia and Mount Vernon.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Tetsukabuto’e0
Outcome
AUDPC valuee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’e1
Setting
Eltopia and Mount Vernone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Tetsukabuto’ had the lowest AUDPC value at Eltopia and Mount Vernon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’ was included as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nongrafted Sugar Baby had the lowest fruit weight per plant at all sites.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
‘Sugar Baby’e0
Outcome
fruit weight per plante0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’ also had the lowest fruit weight per plant at all sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar Baby on Tetsukabuto had the highest fruit weight per plant at Eltopia and Mount Vernon.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Tetsukabuto’e0
Outcome
fruit weight per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’e1
Setting
Eltopia and Mount Vernone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Tetsukabuto’ had the highest fruit weight per plant at Eltopia and Mount Vernon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1338 · show in text ↑
e1

“nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’ was included as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable fruit weight per plant did not differ among treatments at Othello.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
Marketable fruit weight per plante0
Direction
did not differe0
Setting
Othelloe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable fruit weight per plant did not differ among treatments at Othello”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was negatively correlated with AUDPC at Eltopia and Mount Vernon.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Comparator
AUDPC valuese0
Setting
Eltopia and Mount Vernone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was negatively correlated with AUDPC values at both Eltopia and Mount Vernon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number was significantly affected only at Eltopia, where Tetsukabuto exceeded most treatments.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Tetsukabuto’e0
Outcome
Fruit number per plante0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
all other treatments except ‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Rampart’e0
Setting
Eltopiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit number per plant was only significantly impacted at Eltopia, where ‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Tetsukabuto’ had more fruit per plant than all other treatments except ‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Rampart’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting did not affect flesh firmness, soluble solids or lycopene at Othello or Eltopia, apart from a firmness exception.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
flesh firmness, total soluble solids, and lycopene contente0
Direction
unaffectede0
Comparator
nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’e1
Setting
Othello or Eltopiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit quality (flesh firmness, total soluble solids, and lycopene content) was unaffected by grafting at either Othello or Eltopia, except for increased flesh firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1877 · show in text ↑
e1

“nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’ was included as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marvel and Titan grafts increased flesh firmness over nongrafted Sugar Baby at Eltopia.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Marvel’ and ‘Titan’e0
Outcome
flesh firmnesse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’e0
Setting
Eltopiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased flesh firmness for ‘Sugar Baby’ grafted onto ‘Marvel’ and ‘Titan’ as compared with nongrafted ‘Sugar Baby’ at Eltopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1853–1980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. dahliae microsclerotia were observed in all sampled plants.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
V. dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee1pathogen
Outcome
Microsclerotiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microsclerotia typical of this organism were observed in all samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2096–2164 · show in text ↑
e1

“assayed for V. dahliae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude grafting can manage wilt when V. dahliae soil density exceeds 5.0 cfu/g.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Interactor
V. dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee0pathogen
Outcome
managed by graftinge0
Qualifier
exceeds 5.0 cfu/ge0
Setting
Washingtone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“verticillium wilt of watermelon can be successfully managed by grafting when the V. dahliae soil density exceeds 5.0 cfu/g in Washington”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2204–2340 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

grafting · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.