Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Interspecific hybrid squash rootstocks reduced watermelon disease incidence versus nongrafted controls.

A claim from Evaluating Cucurbit Rootstocks to Prevent Disease Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum and P. myriotylum on Watermelon · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interspecific hybrid squash rootstocks reduced watermelon disease incidence versus nongrafted controls.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Grafting to interspecific hybrid squash rootstockse0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
2018 and 2019e0
Comparator
nongrafted controlse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting to interspecific hybrid squash rootstocks reduced disease incidence compared with nongrafted controls in 2018 and 2019.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1009
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–114

Title

Evaluating Cucurbit Rootstocks to Prevent Disease Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum and P. myriotylum on Watermelon

Sean M. Toporek; Anthony P. Keinath Plant Disease 2020. doi:10.1094/pdis-03-20-0474-re

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e6cbd7205c3074a323a3a3f836893f7008641c496aa2f32a37b79762d649e6b4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

grafting · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.