Paper · 2024 · ACS Food Science & Technology

Isochoric Impregnation of Calcium to Extend Postharvest Shelf Life of Blueberries

Valerie S. McGraw; Sumeyye Atci; Matthew J. Powell-Palm; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Isochoric cold storage (ICS) preserves foods at subfreezing temperatures and high pressures without the formation of ice within the food product. The high pressures generated during ICS can additionally be used to impregnate foods with biologically active substances, such as calcium, which can strengthen the cell walls of plants. In this study, the effect of 1- to 7-day ICS treatments at −2 °C with calcium impregnation was investigated as a means to extend the post-treatment shelf life of blueberries over a 5-week storage period at 4 °C. Mass change, water content, soluble solids content, titratable acidity, pH, color, microstructure, texture, nutrient contents, microbial growth, and calcium content were evaluated in ICS-treated, refrigerated, and fresh blueberry samples. ICS with calcium impregnation resulted in no significant mass change or water loss over the 5-week storage period and showed improved mechanical properties, cellular microstructure, and nutrient contents relative to conventional refrigeration over the same storage period. ICS treatments lasting 3–5 days imparted the most improvements to mechanical properties, while 7-day ICS treatments led to the highest nutrient contents. Calcium-impregnated blueberry samples showed a 10-fold increase in calcium concentration versus untreated blueberries and no difference in calcium concentration between 1-day and 7-day ICS treatments, suggesting that quality parameters varying as a function of ICS treatment times only do so as a result of different exposure times to low temperatures and high pressures. Together, these results suggest that 3- to 7-day ICS treatments with calcium impregnation could substantially extend the shelf life of blueberries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isochoric cold storage with calcium impregnation caused no significant mass change or water loss over the 5-week storage period.

Taxon
blueberriese2
Treatment
ICS with calcium impregnatione1
Outcome
mass change or water losse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
over the 5-week storage periode1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“ICS with calcium impregnation resulted in no significant mass change or water loss over the 5-week storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–896 · show in text ↑
e2

“could substantially extend the shelf life of blueberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isochoric cold storage with calcium impregnation improved mechanical properties, cellular microstructure and nutrient contents relative to conventional refrigeration over the same storage period.

Taxon
blueberriese2
Treatment
ICS with calcium impregnatione1
Outcome
mechanical properties, cellular microstructure, and nutrient contentse1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
over the 5-week storage periode1
Comparator
conventional refrigeratione1

Verbatim

e1

“ICS with calcium impregnation resulted in no significant mass change or water loss over the 5-week storage period and showed improved mechanical properties, cellular microstructure, and nutrient contents relative to conventional refrigeration over the same storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–1054 · show in text ↑
e2

“could substantially extend the shelf life of blueberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICS treatments lasting 3–5 days gave the most improvements in mechanical properties of blueberries.

Taxon
blueberriese2
Treatment
ICS treatments lasting 3–5 dayse1
Outcome
mechanical propertiese1
Direction
most improvementse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“ICS treatments lasting 3–5 days imparted the most improvements to mechanical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1143 · show in text ↑
e2

“could substantially extend the shelf life of blueberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

7-day ICS treatments gave the highest nutrient contents in blueberries.

Taxon
blueberriese2
Treatment
7-day ICS treatmentse1
Outcome
nutrient contentse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“7-day ICS treatments led to the highest nutrient contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1208 · show in text ↑
e2

“could substantially extend the shelf life of blueberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium-impregnated blueberries showed a 10-fold increase in calcium concentration relative to untreated blueberries.

Taxon
blueberrye1
Treatment
calcium impregnatione2
Outcome
calcium concentratione1
Direction
increasee1
Value
10-folde1
Comparator
untreated blueberriese1

Verbatim

e1

“Calcium-impregnated blueberry samples showed a 10-fold increase in calcium concentration versus untreated blueberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1327 · show in text ↑
e2

“ICS treatments at −2 °C with calcium impregnation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium concentration did not differ between 1-day and 7-day ICS treatments.

Taxon
blueberriese2
Treatment
7-day ICS treatmentse1
Outcome
calcium concentratione1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
1-daye1

Verbatim

e1

“no difference in calcium concentration between 1-day and 7-day ICS treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1409 · show in text ↑
e2

“could substantially extend the shelf life of blueberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1728 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that quality parameters varying with ICS treatment time reflect different exposure times to low temperatures and high pressures.

Taxon
blueberriese2
Treatment
ICS treatment timese1
Outcome
quality parameterse1
Qualifier
different exposure times to low temperatures and high pressurese1

Verbatim

e1

“suggesting that quality parameters varying as a function of ICS treatment times only do so as a result of different exposure times to low temperatures and high pressures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1580 · show in text ↑
e2

“could substantially extend the shelf life of blueberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1728 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

3- to 7-day ICS treatments with calcium impregnation are suggested to substantially extend the shelf life of blueberries.

Taxon
blueberriese1
Treatment
3- to 7-day ICS treatments with calcium impregnatione1
Outcome
shelf lifee1

Verbatim

e1

“3- to 7-day ICS treatments with calcium impregnation could substantially extend the shelf life of blueberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1728 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · nutrient: content · VacciniumResults differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cold · physiology: water · VacciniumPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cold · nutrient: content · VacciniumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.