Abstract
This study was conducted in the field of the College of Agriculture and Forestry/ University of Mosul during the spring agricultural season of 2023 to examine the effect of three irrigation systems (drip, sprinkler, and surface irrigation) and the use of a subsoil plow at depths of 25-35 cm and 35-45 cm on the potato crop. The split-plot design was used once in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Data were then recorded and statistically analyzed. The results were as follows: The drip irrigation system significantly outperformed in the leaf area of the plant and the yield per plant. The sprinkler irrigation system significantly outperformed in irrigation costs, while the surface irrigation significantly outperformed in pump operating time. The 35-45 cm tillage depth significantly outperformed in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, with an increase of 17.32%, 12.56%, 25.14%, and 12.63% respectively. The 25-35 cm tillage depth recorded the lowest significant values in operating costs and pump operating time, at 18.02% and 12.88% respectively. The interaction between drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth recorded the highest significant values in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, while the interaction between sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depth recorded the highest values in operating costs and pump operating time.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation outperformed for leaf area of the plant.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- drip irrigation systeme0
- Outcome
- leaf area of the plante0
- Direction
- outperformede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The drip irrigation system significantly outperformed in the leaf area of the plant and the yield per plant.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation outperformed for yield per plant.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- drip irrigation systeme0
- Outcome
- yield per plante0
- Direction
- outperformede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The drip irrigation system significantly outperformed in the leaf area of the plant and the yield per plant.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
sprinkler irrigation system outperformed for irrigation costs.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- sprinkler irrigation systeme0
- Outcome
- irrigation costse0
- Direction
- outperformede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The sprinkler irrigation system significantly outperformed in irrigation costs, while the surface irrigation significantly outperformed in pump operating time.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
surface irrigation outperformed for pump operating time.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- surface irrigatione0
- Outcome
- pump operating timee0
- Direction
- outperformede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The sprinkler irrigation system significantly outperformed in irrigation costs, while the surface irrigation significantly outperformed in pump operating time.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage at 35-45 cm increased plant height by 17.32%.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- 35-45 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 17.32%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 35-45 cm tillage depth significantly outperformed in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, with an increase of 17.32%, 12.56%, 25.14%, and 12.63% respectively.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage at 35-45 cm increased leaf area per plant by 12.56%.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- 35-45 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- leaf area per plante0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 12.56%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 35-45 cm tillage depth significantly outperformed in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, with an increase of 17.32%, 12.56%, 25.14%, and 12.63% respectively.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage at 35-45 cm increased yield per plant by 25.14%.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- 35-45 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- yield per plante0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 25.14%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 35-45 cm tillage depth significantly outperformed in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, with an increase of 17.32%, 12.56%, 25.14%, and 12.63% respectively.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage at 35-45 cm increased marketable tuber yield by 12.63%.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- 35-45 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- marketable tuber yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 12.63%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 35-45 cm tillage depth significantly outperformed in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, with an increase of 17.32%, 12.56%, 25.14%, and 12.63% respectively.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage at 25-35 cm had the lowest operating costs, at 18.02%.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- 25-35 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- operating costse0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 18.02%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 25-35 cm tillage depth recorded the lowest significant values in operating costs and pump operating time, at 18.02% and 12.88% respectively.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage at 25-35 cm had the lowest pump operating time, at 12.88%.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- 25-35 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- pump operating timee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 12.88%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 25-35 cm tillage depth recorded the lowest significant values in operating costs and pump operating time, at 18.02% and 12.88% respectively.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth had the highest plant height.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth recorded the highest significant values in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, while the interaction between sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depth recorded the highest values in operating costs and pump operating time.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth had the highest leaf area per plant.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- leaf area per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth recorded the highest significant values in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, while the interaction between sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depth recorded the highest values in operating costs and pump operating time.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth had the highest yield per plant.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- yield per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth recorded the highest significant values in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, while the interaction between sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depth recorded the highest values in operating costs and pump operating time.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth had the highest marketable tuber yield.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- marketable tuber yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth recorded the highest significant values in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, while the interaction between sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depth recorded the highest values in operating costs and pump operating time.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depth had the highest operating costs.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- operating costse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth recorded the highest significant values in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, while the interaction between sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depth recorded the highest values in operating costs and pump operating time.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depth had the highest pump operating time.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depthe0
- Outcome
- pump operating timee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between drip irrigation and 35-45 cm tillage depth recorded the highest significant values in plant height, leaf area per plant, yield per plant, and marketable tuber yield, while the interaction between sprinkler irrigation and 25-35 cm tillage depth recorded the highest values in operating costs and pump operating time.”
t0“Potato”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ
74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
88 papers more in this group
See all 92 papers →tillage · quality: postharvest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →tillage · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →irrigation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.