irrigation · Growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)
46 claims from these papers; 6 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
6 citations between these papers: 4 on the same side, 2 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 21
- positive
- positive
- no effect
A study on the use of fulvic acid to improve growth and resistance in continuous cropping of potato · 2013
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
Effect of Nitrogen and Irrigation on Potato Varieties in West Ethiopia · 2015
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
- negative
Comparative effects of saline water on yield and quality of potato under drip and furrow irrigation · 2017
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Efficiency of Gibberellic Acid and some Modern Insecticides in Control Earias Insulana (Bosid) · 2023
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of subsurface drip fertigation on potato growth, yield, and soil moisture dynamics · 2024
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Irrigation Frequency Strategies and Deep Fertilization in Potato Crop · 2025
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 13
Root Development of Potatoes1 · 1961
- negative
'Norland' Tuber Yields Are Not Affected by Salinity Treatment of Parent Plants · 2001
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
Potential of Plant Extracts as Growth Exogenous Regulators of Potato Seeds · 2013
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.