Abstract
Abstract A field experiment was conducted in Al-Mashroo area / Al-Hamzawi, affiliated to Al-Musayyib district, 35 km north of Babylon, to determine how bio-fertilizer and herbicide spraying affected potato yield and quality under different irrigation periods. The RCBD (Randomized Complete Block Design) split-split plot design was used to conduct the experiment with three replications. The experiment had three factors: irrigation periods (5, 7, and 9) days for the main plots. The second element, biofertilizer, has three levels (control treatment without CO, rhizobia R, mycorrhizal M) and sub-plots. The third component, metribuzin, has four stages (no CO, preemergence, postemergence, late postemergence) and sub-sub plots. The statistical investigation indicated that it excelled the following traits: number of marketable tubers plant -1 , weight of marketable tubers (g), total yield of one plant (g. plant -1 ), marketing yield (ton.ha -1 ). The number of tubers, marketing yield, and plant yield substantially impacted pre-emergence and post-emergence treatments. The (Myco) fertilizer treatment performed better in tuber quantity, weight, and marketing yield (3.26 and 3.77 tuber plant -1 , 106.5 and 107.67 g, 23.17 and 24.78 tons ha -1 ) for both seasons. Irrigation every 7 days increased tuber quantity, weight, yield per plant, and marketing yield (3.37 and 3.89 tubers). 384.3 and 462.3 gm, Plant -1 , 112.2 and 115.53 g Plant -1 (20.85 and 22.08 tons ha -1 ) both seasons. The bilateral interaction between irrigation periods and herbicide was significant in tuber number and marketing yield (3.66 and 3.94 tubers.plant -1 , 4.28 and 4.52 tubers.plant -1 , 25.57 and 22.83 tons ha -1 and 27.11 and 24.34 tons ha -1 ) for both seasons. The interaction between irrigation times and biofertilizer was more significant than the 7-day interaction. For both seasons, Mycox produced 4.01 and 4.64 tubers plant -1 , 113.6 and 119.70 gram, 25.52 and 27.18 tons ha -1 , and marketing yield. The herbicide-bio-fertilizer interaction significantly impacted tuber production, with post-Myco interaction leading to 3.89 and 4.41 tubers per plant -1 in both seasons. The triple interaction was substantial, with 7 days post-Myco resulting in a higher number of tubers (5.32 tubers plant -1 ) in both seasons.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence and post-emergence treatments substantially affected tuber number, marketing yield and plant yield.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- pre-emergence and post-emergence treatmentse0
- Outcome
- number of tubers, marketing yield, and plant yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of tubers, marketing yield, and plant yield substantially impacted pre-emergence and post-emergence treatments”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Myco fertilizer increased tuber quantity to 3.26 and 3.77 tuber plant -1 across seasons.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- (Myco) fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- tuber quantitye0
- Direction
- performed bettere0
- Value
- 3.26 and 3.77 tuber plant -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The (Myco) fertilizer treatment performed better in tuber quantity, weight, and marketing yield (3.26 and 3.77 tuber plant -1 , 106.5 and 107.67 g, 23.17 and 24.78 tons ha -1 ) for both seasons”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Myco fertilizer improved tuber weight to 106.5 and 107.67 g across seasons.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- (Myco) fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- weighte0
- Direction
- performed bettere0
- Value
- 106.5 and 107.67 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The (Myco) fertilizer treatment performed better in tuber quantity, weight, and marketing yield (3.26 and 3.77 tuber plant -1 , 106.5 and 107.67 g, 23.17 and 24.78 tons ha -1 ) for both seasons”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Myco fertilizer improved marketing yield to 23.17 and 24.78 tons ha -1 across seasons.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- (Myco) fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- marketing yielde0
- Direction
- performed bettere0
- Value
- 23.17 and 24.78 tons ha -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The (Myco) fertilizer treatment performed better in tuber quantity, weight, and marketing yield (3.26 and 3.77 tuber plant -1 , 106.5 and 107.67 g, 23.17 and 24.78 tons ha -1 ) for both seasons”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation every 7 days increased tuber quantity to 3.37 and 3.89 tubers.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Irrigation every 7 dayse0
- Outcome
- tuber quantitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.37 and 3.89 tuberse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation every 7 days increased tuber quantity, weight, yield per plant, and marketing yield (3.37 and 3.89 tubers)”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation every 7 days increased tuber weight, reported as 384.3 and 462.3 gm, Plant -1.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Irrigation every 7 dayse0
- Outcome
- weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 384.3 and 462.3 gm, Plant -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation every 7 days increased tuber quantity, weight, yield per plant, and marketing yield (3.37 and 3.89 tubers). 384.3 and 462.3 gm, Plant -1”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation every 7 days increased yield per plant, reported as 112.2 and 115.53 g Plant -1.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Irrigation every 7 dayse0
- Outcome
- yield per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 112.2 and 115.53 g Plant -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation every 7 days increased tuber quantity, weight, yield per plant, and marketing yield (3.37 and 3.89 tubers). 384.3 and 462.3 gm, Plant -1 , 112.2 and 115.53 g Plant -1”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation every 7 days increased marketing yield to 20.85 and 22.08 tons ha -1.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Irrigation every 7 dayse0
- Outcome
- marketing yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 20.85 and 22.08 tons ha -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation every 7 days increased tuber quantity, weight, yield per plant, and marketing yield (3.37 and 3.89 tubers). 384.3 and 462.3 gm, Plant -1 , 112.2 and 115.53 g Plant -1 (20.85 and 22.08 tons ha -1 ) both seasons”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation period and herbicide interacted significantly for tuber number.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation periods and herbicidee0
- Outcome
- tuber numbere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The bilateral interaction between irrigation periods and herbicide was significant in tuber number and marketing yield”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation period and herbicide interacted significantly for marketing yield.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation periods and herbicidee0
- Outcome
- marketing yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The bilateral interaction between irrigation periods and herbicide was significant in tuber number and marketing yield”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation and biofertilizer interacted more significantly than the 7-day interaction.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation times and biofertilizere0
- Outcome
- interaction between irrigation times and biofertilizere0
- Direction
- more significante0
- Comparator
- 7-day interactione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between irrigation times and biofertilizer was more significant than the 7-day interaction”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycox produced 4.01 and 4.64 tubers plant -1 across seasons.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Mycoxe0
- Outcome
- tuberse0
- Value
- 4.01 and 4.64 tubers plant -1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For both seasons, Mycox produced 4.01 and 4.64 tubers plant -1”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycox produced tuber weight of 113.6 and 119.70 gram across seasons.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Mycoxe0
- Outcome
- 113.6 and 119.70 grame0
- Value
- 113.6 and 119.70 grame0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycox produced 4.01 and 4.64 tubers plant -1 , 113.6 and 119.70 gram”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycox yielded 25.52 and 27.18 tons ha -1 across seasons.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Mycoxe0
- Outcome
- marketing yielde0
- Value
- 25.52 and 27.18 tons ha -1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycox produced 4.01 and 4.64 tubers plant -1 , 113.6 and 119.70 gram, 25.52 and 27.18 tons ha -1 , and marketing yield”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide and biofertilizer interacted significantly for tuber production.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- herbicide-bio-fertilizer interactione0
- Outcome
- tuber productione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The herbicide-bio-fertilizer interaction significantly impacted tuber production”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
The post-Myco interaction produced 3.89 and 4.41 tubers per plant -1 across seasons.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- post-Myco interactione0
- Outcome
- tubers per plante0
- Value
- 3.89 and 4.41 tubers per plant -1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“post-Myco interaction leading to 3.89 and 4.41 tubers per plant -1 in both seasons”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
The triple interaction was substantial.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- triple interactione0
- Outcome
- triple interactione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The triple interaction was substantial”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Seven-day post-Myco treatment produced a higher tuber number of 5.32 tubers plant -1.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- 7 days post-Mycoe0
- Outcome
- number of tuberse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 5.32 tubers plant -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“7 days post-Myco resulting in a higher number of tubers (5.32 tubers plant -1 ) in both seasons”
t0“Potato”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ
74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
88 papers more in this group
See all 92 papers →irrigation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →fertilization · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
136 papers more in this group
See all 140 papers →fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
446 papers more in this group
See all 450 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.