Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Irrigation Frequency Strategies and Deep Fertilization in Potato Crop

Gustavo Henrique da Silva; Alécio Rodrigues Pereira; Joslanny Higino Vieira; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The joint adoption of agronomic practices has often been employed to maximize the efficiency of production inputs, especially water and nutrients. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) is a highly demanding crop in both water and nutrients. This study aimed to determine the most appropriate strategy for irrigation frequency and planting fertilization depth in potato cultivated in amended soil, in order to maximize plant growth, tuber yield, and tuber quality. Field experiments were conducted over two growing seasons, with irrigation frequencies of daily irrigation and irrigation every 4, 7, and 10 days, and planting fertilization depths of 10 and 20 cm. Irrigation frequency significantly affected agronomic traits, water consumption, potato growth, and tuber quality. Treatments did not influence root development across different soil layers. Irrigation intervals of 1 and 4 days promoted greater plant growth. A 7-day irrigation interval enhanced specific gravity and soluble solids in tubers, while a 10-day interval increased tuber dry matter content by up to 18% compared to daily irrigation (IF1). Decreasing irrigation frequency reduced the irrigation depth without affecting yield and average tuber mass, and improved water productivity. Water productivity increased by up to 32% under the 10 day irrigation interval (IF10) compared to IF1. Therefore, reducing irrigation frequency is a promising strategy to improve water use efficiency in potato cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation frequency significantly affected agronomic traits, water consumption, growth, and tuber quality.

Treatment
Irrigation frequencye0
Outcome
agronomic traits, water consumption, potato growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation frequency significantly affected agronomic traits, water consumption, potato growth, and tuber quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not affect root development among soil layers.

Treatment
Treatmentse0
Outcome
root developmente0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments did not influence root development across different soil layers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every one or four days promoted greater potato growth.

Treatment
Irrigation intervals of 1 and 4 dayse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation intervals of 1 and 4 days promoted greater plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven-day irrigation enhanced potato tuber specific gravity and soluble solids.

Organ / stage
tuberse0
Treatment
7-day irrigation intervale0
Outcome
specific gravity and soluble solidse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A 7-day irrigation interval enhanced specific gravity and soluble solids in tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten-day irrigation increased tuber dry matter by up to 18% versus daily irrigation.

Treatment
10-day intervale0
Outcome
tuber dry matter contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 18%e0
Comparator
daily irrigation (IF1)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a 10-day interval increased tuber dry matter content by up to 18% compared to daily irrigation (IF1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less frequent irrigation reduced irrigation depth without affecting yield or average tuber mass.

Treatment
Decreasing irrigation frequencye0
Outcome
irrigation depthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing irrigation frequency reduced the irrigation depth without affecting yield and average tuber mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less frequent irrigation improved water productivity.

Treatment
Decreasing irrigation frequencye0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing irrigation frequency reduced the irrigation depth without affecting yield and average tuber mass, and improved water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten-day irrigation raised water productivity by up to 32% versus daily irrigation.

Treatment
10 day irrigation interval (IF10)e0
Outcome
Water productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 32%e0
Comparator
IF1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Water productivity increased by up to 32% under the 10 day irrigation interval (IF10) compared to IF1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1345 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend reducing irrigation frequency to improve potato water use efficiency.

Treatment
reducing irrigation frequencye0
Outcome
improve water use efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing irrigation frequency is a promising strategy to improve water use efficiency in potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1465 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 21 positive, 13 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.