Paper · 2025 · Vestnik of Kazan state agrarin university

ASSESSMENT OF THE FERTILIZERS TYPES IMPACT UNDER ARTIFICIAL IRRIGATION ON POTATO YIELD AND QUALITY IN ZAKAMA REGION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN

Farit Shaykhutdinov; Igor Serzhanov; Razil Garaev; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The studies were conducted to assess the effect of mineral and various types of organic fertilizers on the yield and quality of potato tubers under irrigation in order to develop a crop fertilization system. The work was carried out in 2023-2024 on leached chernozem of Zakama zone of the Republic of Tatarstan. The scheme of the field experiment included studying the following options on dry land and under irrigation: without fertilizers (control); N60H60R90; manure 60 t/ha; N60H60R90 + manure; N60H60R90 + green mass of oilseed mustard 12 t/ha (green manure); N60H60R90+ green manure + winter wheat straw 4/5 t/ha; N60H60R90+ manure + straw; manure + green manure + straw. Agrometeorological conditions in 2023 were relatively favorable (HTC - 1,06), in 2024 - dry (HTC 0,6...0,8). On average, over 2 years, the potato yield with irrigation was higher than in dryland farming, depending on the nutrition background by 8,54...18,57 t/ha. The maximum yield of tubers per unit area in the experiment (41,49 t/ha) was noted in the variant with the introduction of N60H60R90, manure and straw, which is 21,37 t/ha more than in the control. The starch content in tubers, regardless of the nutrition background, decreased by 0,6...1,6% with irrigation, compared to dry farming.The total starch yield per unit area increased due to the increase in yield. In the variant with the introduction of N60H60R90, manure and straw, both on dry farming and with irrigation, the starch yield was maximum - 3,59...6,03 t/ha. The highest economic indicators were noted in the variant where mineral fertilizers were applied together with manure and straw - the profit from irrigation was 217,200 rubles/ha, from dryland farming - 94,000 rubles/ha, which is 89,490 and 39,060 rubles/ha more, respectively, than when applying only mineral fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased potato yield by 8,54...18,57 t/ha compared with dryland farming.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
potato yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8,54...18,57 t/hae0
Qualifier
depending on the nutrition backgrounde0
Comparator
dryland farminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the potato yield with irrigation was higher than in dryland farming, depending on the nutrition background by 8,54...18,57 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N60H60R90, manure and straw gave maximum tuber yield of 41,49 t/ha, 21,37 t/ha above control.

Treatment
N60H60R90, manure and strawe0
Outcome
yield of tubers per unit areae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
41,49 t/hae0
Qualifier
21,37 t/ha moree0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield of tubers per unit area in the experiment (41,49 t/ha) was noted in the variant with the introduction of N60H60R90, manure and straw, which is 21,37 t/ha more than in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation decreased potato tuber starch content by 0,6...1,6% compared with dry farming.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
starch content in tuberse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0,6...1,6%e0
Comparator
dry farminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The starch content in tubers, regardless of the nutrition background, decreased by 0,6...1,6% with irrigation, compared to dry farming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO YIELD AND QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total starch yield per unit area increased because tuber yield increased.

Outcome
total starch yield per unit areae0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total starch yield per unit area increased due to the increase in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO YIELD AND QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N60H60R90, manure and straw produced maximum starch yield of 3,59...6,03 t/ha under dry farming and irrigation.

Treatment
N60H60R90, manure and strawe0
Outcome
starch yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3,59...6,03 t/hae0
Qualifier
both on dry farming and with irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the variant with the introduction of N60H60R90, manure and straw, both on dry farming and with irrigation, the starch yield was maximum - 3,59...6,03 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1510 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO YIELD AND QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer with manure and straw yielded irrigation profit of 217,200 rubles/ha, 89,490 rubles/ha above mineral fertilizer alone.

Treatment
mineral fertilizers were applied together with manure and strawe0
Outcome
profit from irrigatione0
Direction
moree0
Value
217,200 rubles/hae0
Qualifier
89,490e0
Comparator
only mineral fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mineral fertilizers were applied together with manure and straw - the profit from irrigation was 217,200 rubles/ha, from dryland farming - 94,000 rubles/ha, which is 89,490 and 39,060 rubles/ha more, respectively, than when applying only mineral fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1833 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO YIELD AND QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer with manure and straw yielded dryland profit of 94,000 rubles/ha, 39,060 rubles/ha above mineral fertilizer alone.

Treatment
mineral fertilizers were applied together with manure and strawe0
Outcome
from dryland farminge0
Direction
moree0
Value
94,000 rubles/hae0
Qualifier
39,060 rubles/hae0
Comparator
only mineral fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mineral fertilizers were applied together with manure and straw - the profit from irrigation was 217,200 rubles/ha, from dryland farming - 94,000 rubles/ha, which is 89,490 and 39,060 rubles/ha more, respectively, than when applying only mineral fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1833 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO YIELD AND QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

61 papers: 42 positive, 19 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.