Paper · 2015 · http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20150304.19.pdf

Optimization of Seed Potato Specific Density, Starch and Dry Matter Contents and Tuberization Capacity of Resultant Plants Through Integrated Irrigation, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Management

Gathungu Geofrey Kingori; Aguyoh Joseph Nyamori; Isutsa Dorcas Khasungu

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted in a Rainshelter (RTrial) at the Horticultural Research and Teaching Farm of Egerton University to determine the effect of integrated application of irrigation water, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) on seed potato physiological quality and performance of plants resulting from them. The treatments arranged in a split-split plot in a completely randomized block design, consisted of three irrigation water rates (40%, 65% and 100% field capacity), four N rates (0, 75, 112.5 and 150 kg N/ha) supplied as urea (46% N), and four P rates (0, 50.6, 75.9, 101.2 kg P/ha) supplied as triple superphosphate with experiment replicated three times and repeated once. After harvest seed specific density, starch and dry matter contents were determined after which 15 seed tubers per treatment were stored for 90 days under diffuse-light sprouting conditions for postharvest (PTrial) evaluation. Later, three potato tubers were selected per treatment and planted to study growth vigour and tuberization capacity of resultant potato plants both in PTrials I and II. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance and significantly different means were separated using Tukey’s Studentized Range Test at P=0.05. Specific density, starch and dry matter contents increased from 40% to 65% irrigation water. Application of irrigation water beyond 65% reduced the specific density, starch and dry matter contents by 0.03, 2.6%, 3.7% and 0.04, 3.7%, 5.2% in RTrials I and II, respectively. The 100% compared to 65% irrigation rate reduced post-treatment evaluation stem number, density and height at 57 DAP by 1.3 and 1.1, 15.1 and 12.6, and 13.4 cm and 10.3 cm, and tuberization capacity in resultant plants by 5 and 8.7 tubers, in PTrials I and II, respectively. Application of N and P significantly increased seed potato specific density, starch and dry matter contents but application of N and P beyond 112.5 kg N/ha and 75.9 kg P/ha respectively reduced the same both in RTrials I and II, respectively. In postharvest evaluation integration of N at 0 to 112.5 kg N/ha with 65% irrigation rate increased the number of tubers produced by the resultant plants by 3.4 and 5.4, while high P rate at 75.9 kg P/ha increased tuberization by 8.4 and 10.7, in RTrials I and II, respectively. Integration of 65% irrigation rate, 112.5 kg N/ha and 75.9 kg P/ha rates optimized potato growth, and vigour of resulting potato plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed potato specific density, starch and dry matter contents increased from 40% to 65% irrigation.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Treatment
65% irrigation watere0
Outcome
Specific density, starch and dry matter contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
40%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Specific density, starch and dry matter contents increased from 40% to 65% irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation above 65% reduced seed specific density by 0.03 and 0.04 in the two trials.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Treatment
irrigation water beyond 65%e0
Outcome
specific densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.03e0
Qualifier
RTrials I and IIe0
Comparator
65%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of irrigation water beyond 65% reduced the specific density, starch and dry matter contents by 0.03, 2.6%, 3.7% and 0.04, 3.7%, 5.2% in RTrials I and II, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation above 65% reduced seed starch by 2.6% and 3.7% in the two trials.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Treatment
irrigation water beyond 65%e0
Outcome
starche0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.6%e0
Comparator
65%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of irrigation water beyond 65% reduced the specific density, starch and dry matter contents by 0.03, 2.6%, 3.7% and 0.04, 3.7%, 5.2% in RTrials I and II, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation above 65% reduced seed dry matter by 3.7% and 5.2% in the two trials.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Treatment
irrigation water beyond 65%e0
Outcome
dry matter contentse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
5.2%e0
Comparator
65%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of irrigation water beyond 65% reduced the specific density, starch and dry matter contents by 0.03, 2.6%, 3.7% and 0.04, 3.7%, 5.2% in RTrials I and II, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation reduced subsequent stem number relative to 65% irrigation.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
stem numbere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.3 and 1.1e0
Comparator
65% irrigation ratee0

Verbatim

e0

“The 100% compared to 65% irrigation rate reduced post-treatment evaluation stem number, density and height at 57 DAP by 1.3 and 1.1, 15.1 and 12.6, and 13.4 cm and 10.3 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation reduced subsequent stem density relative to 65% irrigation.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15.1 and 12.6e0
Comparator
65% irrigation ratee0

Verbatim

e0

“The 100% compared to 65% irrigation rate reduced post-treatment evaluation stem number, density and height at 57 DAP by 1.3 and 1.1, 15.1 and 12.6, and 13.4 cm and 10.3 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation reduced subsequent stem height relative to 65% irrigation.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13.4 cm and 10.3 cme0
Comparator
65% irrigation ratee0

Verbatim

e0

“The 100% compared to 65% irrigation rate reduced post-treatment evaluation stem number, density and height at 57 DAP by 1.3 and 1.1, 15.1 and 12.6, and 13.4 cm and 10.3 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation reduced tuberization capacity by 5 and 8.7 tubers in the two trials.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Outcome
tuberization capacitye0
Value
5 and 8.7 tuberse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“tuberization capacity in resultant plants by 5 and 8.7 tubers, in PTrials I and II, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and phosphorus increased seed specific density, starch and dry matter.

Taxon
seed potatoe0
Treatment
N and Pe0
Outcome
specific density, starch and dry matter contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of N and P significantly increased seed potato specific density, starch and dry matter contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1775–1882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and phosphorus above 112.5 kg N/ha and 75.9 kg P/ha reduced those quality traits.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Treatment
N and P beyond 112.5 kg N/ha and 75.9 kg P/hae0
Outcome
the samee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of N and P beyond 112.5 kg N/ha and 75.9 kg P/ha respectively reduced the same both in RTrials I and II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–2002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrating nitrogen up to 112.5 kg N/ha with 65% irrigation increased resulting tuber number by 3.4 and 5.4.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Treatment
N at 0 to 112.5 kg N/ha with 65% irrigation ratee0
Outcome
number of tubers produced by the resultant plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.4 and 5.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“integration of N at 0 to 112.5 kg N/ha with 65% irrigation rate increased the number of tubers produced by the resultant plants by 3.4 and 5.4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 75.9 kg P/ha rate increased tuberization by 8.4 and 10.7.

Taxon
Seed Potatot0
Treatment
P rate at 75.9 kg P/hae0
Outcome
tuberizatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.4 and 10.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“high P rate at 75.9 kg P/ha increased tuberization by 8.4 and 10.7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2194–2260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seed Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 65% irrigation, 112.5 kg N/ha and 75.9 kg P/ha optimized growth and vigour.

Treatment
65% irrigation rate, 112.5 kg N/ha and 75.9 kg P/ha ratese0
Outcome
potato growth, and vigoure0
Direction
optimizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of 65% irrigation rate, 112.5 kg N/ha and 75.9 kg P/ha rates optimized potato growth, and vigour of resulting potato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2297–2433 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 21 positive, 13 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 38 positive, 13 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
    Low biomass genotypes increased root development under nitrogen deficiency stress.

    In vitro method for early evaluation of nitrogen use efficiency associated traits in potato · 2014 · compared with full nitrogen availability

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

phosphorus · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.