Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In the pot trial, KCl fertilization decreased tuber starch content by approximately 2.2 to 2.4% compared with controls.

A claim from Tuber Quality Parameters of Potato Varieties Depend on Potassium Fertilizer Rate and Source · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the pot trial, KCl fertilization decreased tuber starch content by approximately 2.2 to 2.4% compared with controls.

Treatment
fertilized with KCle0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.2 to 2.4%e0
Comparator
controlse0
Setting
pot traile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For all variants from the pot trail fertilized with KCl the starch content was decreased approximately with 2.2 to 2.4% in comparison to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–843
t0

“Potato Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44

Title

Tuber Quality Parameters of Potato Varieties Depend on Potassium Fertilizer Rate and Source

Ivan Manolov; Nesho Neshev; Vesela Chalova Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 2016. doi:10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.09.010

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-fa987e6d6aa0a55b0ce8e1f879fce33c79aa163e91ba2e5dabda72c371a31ced · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

potassium chloride · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
See all 5 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

61 papers: 42 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.