Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Potato Growth, Yield, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies

Bhimsen Shrestha; Blair L. Stringam; Murali K. Darapuneni; et al.

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Irrigation and nitrogen management are crucial for sustainable potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production. A field experiment was conducted during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons at Farmington, New Mexico, to evaluate the performance of two chip potato varieties (Lamoka and Waneta) under three irrigation regimes (full irrigation (FI), 20% deficit irrigation (DI) and 40% DI) and seven nitrogen fertilizer rates (0, 60, 115, 170, 220, 280, and 340 kg N/ha). The treatment combinations of irrigation regimes, nitrogen rates, and varieties were arranged in a split–split plot design with three replications as main plot, sub-plot, and sub-sub plot, respectively. The two-year results showed that irrigation regimes had the most significant effect on plant growth, physiology, and tuber yield of the potato varieties. For both Lamoka and Waneta, the plant height and canopy cover were lower under 40% DI than under 20% DI and FI treatments. The SPAD meter values were higher under 40% DI, followed by 20% DI and FI treatments, whereas the stomatal conductance was higher under FI, followed by 20% DI and 40% DI during both growing seasons. Regardless of nitrogen rates and variety, a 20% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced the total tuber yield by 4.5% and 22.1% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, while the 40% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 36.8% and 58.2% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, as compared to full irrigation. Shifting from full irrigation to 20% DI could save 711.2 to 1036.3 m3/ha of irrigation water. For Lamoka, the highest total tuber yield was obtained with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI and 220 kg N/ha under FI in 2022 and 2023, respectively. For Waneta, the highest total tuber yield was obtained with 115 kg N/ha under 20% DI and 170 kg N/ha under FI in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Maximum water use efficiency (WUE) was obtained at 60 kg N/ha with 20% DI for both Lamoka and Waneta in 2022, while maximum WUE was obtained at 220 kg N/ha under FI for Lamoka and at 170 kg N/ha for Waneta in the 2023 season. The maximum nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) was achieved with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI for both varieties during both growing seasons. Thus, for sustainable irrigation and nitrogen management, the application of a 20% deficit irrigation strategy with a lower nitrogen rate (60 to 170 kg N/ha) could be the best option to improve WUE and NUE with minimal tuber yield reduction. Our study suggested that 40% deficit irrigation would not be beneficial as compared to both full irrigation and 20% water-saving irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 40% DI, plant height and canopy cover were lower than under 20% DI and FI for both varieties.

Treatment
40% DIe0
Outcome
plant height and canopy covere0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
20% DI and FI treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For both Lamoka and Waneta, the plant height and canopy cover were lower under 40% DI than under 20% DI and FI treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD values ranked highest under 40% DI, then 20% DI, then FI.

Treatment
40% DIe0
Outcome
SPAD meter valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
20% DI and FI treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SPAD meter values were higher under 40% DI, followed by 20% DI and FI treatments, whereas the stomatal conductance was higher under FI, followed by 20% DI and 40% DI during both growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance ranked highest under FI, then 20% DI, then 40% DI.

Treatment
FIe0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
20% DI and 40% DIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SPAD meter values were higher under 40% DI, followed by 20% DI and FI treatments, whereas the stomatal conductance was higher under FI, followed by 20% DI and 40% DI during both growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 4.5% in 2022 compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
20% water-saving irrigation strategye0
Outcome
total tuber yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.5%e0
Qualifier
2022e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of nitrogen rates and variety, a 20% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced the total tuber yield by 4.5% and 22.1% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, while the 40% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 36.8% and 58.2% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, as compared to full irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 22.1% in 2023 compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
20% water-saving irrigation strategye0
Outcome
total tuber yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22.1%e0
Qualifier
2023e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of nitrogen rates and variety, a 20% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced the total tuber yield by 4.5% and 22.1% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, while the 40% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 36.8% and 58.2% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, as compared to full irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 36.8% in 2022 compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
40% water-saving irrigation strategye0
Outcome
total tuber yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
36.8%e0
Qualifier
2022e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of nitrogen rates and variety, a 20% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced the total tuber yield by 4.5% and 22.1% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, while the 40% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 36.8% and 58.2% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, as compared to full irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 58.2% in 2023 compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
40% water-saving irrigation strategye0
Outcome
total tuber yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
58.2%e0
Qualifier
2023e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of nitrogen rates and variety, a 20% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced the total tuber yield by 4.5% and 22.1% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, while the 40% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 36.8% and 58.2% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, as compared to full irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing from FI to 20% DI saved 711.2 to 1036.3 m3/ha of irrigation water.

Treatment
20% DIe0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savee0
Value
711.2 to 1036.3 m3/hae0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shifting from full irrigation to 20% DI could save 711.2 to 1036.3 m3/ha of irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lamoka attained the highest tuber yield with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI in 2022.

Material
Lamokae0
Treatment
60 kg N/ha under 20% DIe0
Outcome
highest total tuber yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2022e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Lamoka, the highest total tuber yield was obtained with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI and 220 kg N/ha under FI in 2022 and 2023, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lamoka attained the highest tuber yield with 220 kg N/ha under FI in 2023.

Material
Lamokae0
Treatment
220 kg N/ha under FIe0
Outcome
highest total tuber yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2023e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Lamoka, the highest total tuber yield was obtained with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI and 220 kg N/ha under FI in 2022 and 2023, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waneta attained the highest tuber yield with 115 kg N/ha under 20% DI in 2022.

Material
Wanetae0
Treatment
115 kg N/ha under 20% DIe0
Outcome
highest total tuber yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2022e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Waneta, the highest total tuber yield was obtained with 115 kg N/ha under 20% DI and 170 kg N/ha under FI in 2022 and 2023, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waneta attained the highest tuber yield with 170 kg N/ha under FI in 2023.

Material
Wanetae0
Treatment
170 kg N/ha under FIe0
Outcome
highest total tuber yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2023e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Waneta, the highest total tuber yield was obtained with 115 kg N/ha under 20% DI and 170 kg N/ha under FI in 2022 and 2023, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both varieties attained maximum WUE at 60 kg N/ha with 20% DI in 2022.

Material
Lamoka and Wanetae0
Treatment
60 kg N/ha with 20% DIe0
Outcome
Maximum water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
Maximume0
Qualifier
2022e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum water use efficiency (WUE) was obtained at 60 kg N/ha with 20% DI for both Lamoka and Waneta in 2022, while maximum WUE was obtained at 220 kg N/ha under FI for Lamoka and at 170 kg N/ha for Waneta in the 2023 season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1872–2097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lamoka attained maximum WUE at 220 kg N/ha under FI in 2023.

Material
Lamokae0
Treatment
220 kg N/ha under FIe0
Outcome
maximum WUEe0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
2023 seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum water use efficiency (WUE) was obtained at 60 kg N/ha with 20% DI for both Lamoka and Waneta in 2022, while maximum WUE was obtained at 220 kg N/ha under FI for Lamoka and at 170 kg N/ha for Waneta in the 2023 season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1872–2097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waneta attained maximum WUE at 170 kg N/ha in 2023.

Material
Wanetae0
Treatment
170 kg N/hae0
Outcome
maximum WUEe0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
2023 seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum water use efficiency (WUE) was obtained at 60 kg N/ha with 20% DI for both Lamoka and Waneta in 2022, while maximum WUE was obtained at 220 kg N/ha under FI for Lamoka and at 170 kg N/ha for Waneta in the 2023 season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1872–2097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both varieties attained maximum NUE with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI during both years.

Treatment
60 kg N/ha under 20% DIe0
Outcome
maximum nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
both growing seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) was achieved with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI for both varieties during both growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2098–2229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 20% deficit irrigation with 60 to 170 kg N/ha for WUE and NUE with minimal yield reduction.

Outcome
application of a 20% deficit irrigation strategy with a lower nitrogen rate (60 to 170 kg N/ha)e0
Qualifier
improve WUE and NUE with minimal tuber yield reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, for sustainable irrigation and nitrogen management, the application of a 20% deficit irrigation strategy with a lower nitrogen rate (60 to 170 kg N/ha) could be the best option to improve WUE and NUE with minimal tuber yield reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2230–2471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise against 40% deficit irrigation relative to FI or 20% saving.

Outcome
40% deficit irrigation would not be beneficiale0
Comparator
full irrigation and 20% water-saving irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our study suggested that 40% deficit irrigation would not be beneficial as compared to both full irrigation and 20% water-saving irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2472–2612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 21 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.