Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation treatments significantly increased total potato yield by 10 t/ha (36%) in 1994.

A claim from Soil Management and Supplemental Irrigation Effects on Potato: I. Soil Properties, Tuber Yield, and Quality · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments significantly increased total potato yield by 10 t/ha (36%) in 1994.

Treatment
Irrigation treatmentse6
Outcome
total yieldse6
Direction
significantly increasede6
Value
10 t ha −1 (36%)e6
Qualifier
in 1994e6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rainfall in the northeastern United States can be erratic, causing fluctuations in the supply and quality of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L. )”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 9–148
e6

“Irrigation treatments significantly increased total yields by 10 t ha −1 (36%) in 1994 and 11.6 t ha −1 (37%) in 1995, while significantly reducing specific gravity and increasing tuber size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1592

Title

Soil Management and Supplemental Irrigation Effects on Potato: I. Soil Properties, Tuber Yield, and Quality

Gregory A. Porter; W. Bart Bradbury; Jonathan A. Sisson; et al. Agronomy Journal 1999. doi:10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100030010x

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e367bf2a16298356209c232a037e54d49c94a3528d99b9582690628f96e2b52f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.