Paper · 2012 · Journal of Crop Improvement

Impact of Deficit Irrigation on Tuber Yield and Quality of Potato Cultivars

A. K. Alva; A. D. Moore; H. P. Collins

9
claims
36
verbatim quotes
51
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber yield and quality are impacted by irrigation and nitrogen (N) management. This study was conducted in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) region of United States to evaluate the effects of deficit irrigation (DI) and rates of pre-plant and in-season N applications on Ranger Russet and Umatilla Russet cultivars. In 2004, with Ranger Russet only, DI with 20% lower total irrigation for the entire growing period resulted in 28% tuber yield reduction compared to that of plants irrigated to replenishment full evapotranspiration (ET), i.e., full irrigation (FI). A subsequent study in 2006 and 2007 with DI (14% to 17% deficit) resulted in tuber yield reduction of 7% to 10% in both cultivars compared to full ET irrigation. Yield reduction in DI was generally attributed to reduction in large weight tubers, >0.227 kg/tuber, in both cultivars across three years. Petiole NO3-N concentrations were greater in plants grown under DI as compared to those of plants in full ET irrigation across all years and cultivars, particularly during tuber maturation stage. This is an important consideration as increased N availability during the late growing season adversely affects tuber quality. Petiole NO3-N concentrations increased with increased in-season N rates. In 2007, 112 kg·ha−1 in-season N resulted in petiole NO3-N concentrations below desirable concentrations across most of the growing season in both cultivars. This, in turn, contributed to a significant reduction in tuber yield as compared to the 224 kg·ha−1 in-season N rate. Continuous DI with 14% to 20% reduction in water as compared to irrigation to replenish full ET, begun three to four weeks after seedling emergence, had significant negative effects on tuber yields of both cultivars in high-production irrigated growing conditions. Application of N up to 112 kg ha−1 as pre-plant soil applied plus 224 kg ha−1 of in-season fertigation in five applications at two-week intervals beginning four weeks after seedling emergence appears to be adequate to support high yields of high-quality tubers. Keywords: Solanum tuberosumevapotranspirationnitrogen managementnitrate leachingpetiole nutrientsharvest indexsoil-water balance Acknowledgments This study was made possible by the generous support of AgriNorthwest Company, Kennewick, Wash., by providing: (i) field site, water, field equipment, and major tillage operations support during this project and (ii) petiole analyses support (Martin Moore). Grateful appreciation is also extended to Bill Boge, Marc Seymour, and several field helpers for their contributions to this experiment and preparation of this manuscript. Notes This article is not subject to US copyright law. 1 Effects of irrigation and nitrogen management on potato quality. Washington Potato Information Exchange. Pasco, WA. May 29, 1997.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2004, a 20% irrigation deficit reduced Ranger Russet tuber yield by 28% versus full irrigation.

Taxon
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)Solanum tuberosume1
Material
Ranger Russete0
Treatment
DI with 20% lower total irrigatione0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
28%e0
Comparator
full irrigation (FI)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2004, with Ranger Russet only, DI with 20% lower total irrigation for the entire growing period resulted in 28% tuber yield reduction compared to that of plants irrigated to replenishment full evapotranspiration (ET), i.e., full irrigation (FI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“112 kg·ha−1 in-season N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2006–2007, a 14%–17% deficit reduced tuber yield by 7%–10% in both cultivars.

Taxon
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)Solanum tuberosume1
Material
both cultivarse0
Treatment
DI (14% to 17% deficit)e0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
7% to 10%e0
Comparator
full ET irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A subsequent study in 2006 and 2007 with DI (14% to 17% deficit) resulted in tuber yield reduction of 7% to 10% in both cultivars compared to full ET irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“112 kg·ha−1 in-season N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced large weight tubers across three years.

Taxon
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)Solanum tuberosume1
Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
large weight tuberse0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
>0.227 kg/tubere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield reduction in DI was generally attributed to reduction in large weight tubers, >0.227 kg/tuber, in both cultivars across three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“112 kg·ha−1 in-season N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation raised petiole NO3-N concentrations compared with full irrigation.

Taxon
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)Solanum tuberosume1
Organ / stage
tuber maturation stagee0
Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
Petiole NO3-N concentrationse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
full ET irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Petiole NO3-N concentrations were greater in plants grown under DI as compared to those of plants in full ET irrigation across all years and cultivars, particularly during tuber maturation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“112 kg·ha−1 in-season N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1328 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole NO3-N concentrations increased with in-season nitrogen rate.

Taxon
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)Solanum tuberosume1
Treatment
in-season N ratese0
Outcome
Petiole NO3-N concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Petiole NO3-N concentrations increased with increased in-season N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“112 kg·ha−1 in-season N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2007, 112 kg·ha−1 in-season nitrogen left petiole NO3-N below desirable concentrations.

Taxon
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)Solanum tuberosume1
Treatment
112 kg·ha−1 in-season Ne0
Outcome
petiole NO3-N concentrationse0
Direction
belowe0
Comparator
desirable concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2007, 112 kg·ha−1 in-season N resulted in petiole NO3-N concentrations below desirable concentrations across most of the growing season in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“112 kg·ha−1 in-season N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 112 kg·ha−1 in-season nitrogen rate significantly reduced tuber yield versus 224 kg·ha−1.

Taxon
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)Solanum tuberosume1
Treatment
112 kg·ha−1 in-season Ne2
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
224 kg·ha−1 in-season N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This, in turn, contributed to a significant reduction in tuber yield as compared to the 224 kg·ha−1 in-season N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“112 kg·ha−1 in-season N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous deficit irrigation had significant negative effects on tuber yields of both cultivars.

Taxon
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)Solanum tuberosume1
Treatment
Continuous DI with 14% to 20% reduction in watere0
Outcome
tuber yieldse0
Direction
negative effectse0
Qualifier
begun three to four weeks after seedling emergencee0
Comparator
irrigation to replenish full ETe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous DI with 14% to 20% reduction in water as compared to irrigation to replenish full ET, begun three to four weeks after seedling emergence, had significant negative effects on tuber yields of both cultivars in high-production irrigated growing conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“112 kg·ha−1 in-season N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1328 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the stated pre-plant and in-season nitrogen schedule to support high-quality, high-yield tubers.

Taxon
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)Solanum tuberosume1
Treatment
Application of N up to 112 kg ha−1 as pre-plant soil applied plus 224 kg ha−1 of in-season fertigation in five applications at two-week intervals beginning four weeks after seedling emergencee0
Outcome
high yields of high-quality tuberse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of N up to 112 kg ha−1 as pre-plant soil applied plus 224 kg ha−1 of in-season fertigation in five applications at two-week intervals beginning four weeks after seedling emergence appears to be adequate to support high yields of high-quality tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–2097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“112 kg·ha−1 in-season N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1328 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.