Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Effects of Irrigation Practices on Potato Yield and Water Productivity: A Global Meta-Analysis

Yining Niu; Linlin Wang; Zhuzhu Luo; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The efficiency of water use in irrigated agriculture is a global priority to address water scarcity. A comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of irrigation practices on potato yield, crop evapotranspiration (ETc), water productivity (WP), and irrigation water productivity (IWP) across diverse growing conditions, including soil texture, fertilizer application rates, annual precipitation, and soil organic carbon (SOC). The results revealed that supplementary irrigation increased potato yield by 55% and ETc by 39% while maintaining WP comparable to non-irrigated conditions. The greatest yield and WP improvements from supplementary irrigation occurred under drip irrigation with moderate N, P, and K application rates (150–250 kg ha−1) and irrigation amounts below 150 mm. This practice was particularly effective in sandy soils with 1.5–2.0% SOC and annual rainfall of 200–400 mm. Conversely, deficit irrigation reduced potato yield and ETc by 25% and 24%, respectively, but significantly enhanced WP and IWP by 9% and 28% compared to full irrigation. When a water-saving ratio of 10–20% was implemented under drip irrigation with optimal fertilizer rates (240–360 kg N ha−1, >104 kg P2O5 ha−1, 150–200 kg K2O ha−1), deficit irrigation improved WP without yield loss in sandy soils with annual rainfall of 600–800 mm when compared to full irrigation. The IWP increased with rising SOC levels, indicating that SOC improvement in low-carbon soils enhances water productivity in irrigated potato systems. These findings demonstrate that tailored irrigation strategies can simultaneously reduce water inputs and achieve higher yield and WP in potato production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary irrigation increased yield by 55%.

Treatment
supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
potato yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplementary irrigation increased potato yield by 55%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary irrigation increased crop evapotranspiration by 39%.

Treatment
supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
ETce0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplementary irrigation increased potato yield by 55% and ETc by 39%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary irrigation maintained water productivity comparable to non-irrigated conditions.

Outcome
WPe0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
non-irrigated conditionse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while maintaining WP comparable to non-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greatest supplementary irrigation yield and water-productivity improvements occurred with drip irrigation, moderate fertilizer rates and less than 150 mm irrigation.

Treatment
supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
yield and WP improvementse0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
drip irrigation with moderate N, P, and K application rates (150–250 kg ha−1) and irrigation amounts below 150 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest yield and WP improvements from supplementary irrigation occurred under drip irrigation with moderate N, P, and K application rates (150–250 kg ha−1) and irrigation amounts below 150 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This practice was especially effective in sandy soils with 1.5–2.0% SOC and 200–400 mm annual rainfall.

Outcome
particularly effectivee0
Qualifier
1.5–2.0% SOC and annual rainfall of 200–400 mme0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This practice was particularly effective in sandy soils with 1.5–2.0% SOC and annual rainfall of 200–400 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced yield by 25% versus full irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
potato yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation reduced potato yield and ETc by 25% and 24%, respectively, but significantly enhanced WP and IWP by 9% and 28% compared to full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced evapotranspiration by 24% versus full irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
ETce0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation reduced potato yield and ETc by 25% and 24%, respectively, but significantly enhanced WP and IWP by 9% and 28% compared to full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation significantly enhanced water productivity by 9%.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation reduced potato yield and ETc by 25% and 24%, respectively, but significantly enhanced WP and IWP by 9% and 28% compared to full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation significantly enhanced irrigation water productivity by 28%.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
IWPe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
28%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation reduced potato yield and ETc by 25% and 24%, respectively, but significantly enhanced WP and IWP by 9% and 28% compared to full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 10–20% water saving under drip irrigation and specified fertilizer rates, deficit irrigation improved WP in sandy soils with 600–800 mm annual rainfall.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
water-saving ratio of 10–20%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When a water-saving ratio of 10–20% was implemented under drip irrigation with optimal fertilizer rates (240–360 kg N ha−1, >104 kg P2O5 ha−1, 150–200 kg K2O ha−1), deficit irrigation improved WP without yield loss in sandy soils with annual rainfall of 600–800 mm when compared to full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under those conditions, deficit irrigation avoided yield loss versus full irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without yield losse0
Comparator
full irrigatione0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation improved WP without yield loss in sandy soils with annual rainfall of 600–800 mm when compared to full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water productivity increased with SOC levels.

Outcome
IWPe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
rising SOC levelse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The IWP increased with rising SOC levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.