Abstract
The present study investigated the effects of two different zeolite applications and different nitrogen-based fertilizers on chickpea’s yield and yield components in dry and irrigated conditions. The field experiment was conducted during 2019 and 2020 in the experimental area of the Faculty of Agriculture, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Türkiye. The experimental design was a split-split plot with four replicates. The main plots were grown under dry-irrigated conditions. At the same time, subplots received zeolite applications (zeolite+- zeolite-), and sub-sub plots received nitrogen applications [control, traditional, chemical, farmyard manure, and Isabion, (an animal collagen-derived biostimulant)]. The experiment found that irrigation caused a delay in phenological characters but had a favorable impact on morphological characters and yield. The effect of zeolite applications was different in the first and second years of the experiments for the investigated characters. In the first year, the application of zeolite had a significant impact on grain yield, but there was no discernible effect in the second year. The experiment demonstrated that both chemical fertilizer and farmyard manure positively impacted phenological and morphological characteristics. In both years, the farmyard manure plots produced the highest grain yield. Farmers in Türkiye are advised to apply nitrogen to their crops as the profitability of chickpeas has risen in recent years. If the high cost of farmyard manure renders its use impracticable, farmers can opt for chemical fertilizer as an alternative.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation delayed the phenological characters of chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- phenological characterse0
- Direction
- delaye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The experiment found that irrigation caused a delay in phenological characters but had a favorable impact on morphological characters and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation had a favorable impact on the morphological characters and yield of chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- morphological characters and yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The experiment found that irrigation caused a delay in phenological characters but had a favorable impact on morphological characters and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Zeolite application had a significant effect on grain yield of chickpea in the first year.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- application of zeolitee1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Qualifier
- In the first yeare1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e1“In the first year, the application of zeolite had a significant impact on grain yield, but there was no discernible effect in the second year”
Claim · model-written summary
Zeolite application had no discernible effect on grain yield of chickpea in the second year.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- zeolitee1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- no discernible effecte1
- Qualifier
- in the second yeare1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e1“In the first year, the application of zeolite had a significant impact on grain yield, but there was no discernible effect in the second year”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical fertilizer positively affected the phenological and morphological characteristics of chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- chemical fertilizere2
- Outcome
- phenological and morphological characteristicse2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e2“The experiment demonstrated that both chemical fertilizer and farmyard manure positively impacted phenological and morphological characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure positively affected the phenological and morphological characteristics of chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- farmyard manuree2
- Outcome
- phenological and morphological characteristicse2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e2“The experiment demonstrated that both chemical fertilizer and farmyard manure positively impacted phenological and morphological characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure plots produced the highest chickpea grain yield in both years.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- farmyard manuree3
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Qualifier
- In both yearse3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e3“In both years, the farmyard manure plots produced the highest grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmers in Türkiye should apply nitrogen to their chickpea crops, as chickpea profitability has risen.
- Taxon
- chickpeasCicer arietinume4
- Outcome
- apply nitrogen to their cropse4
- Setting
- Türkiyee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Farmers in Türkiye are advised to apply nitrogen to their crops as the profitability of chickpeas has risen in recent years”
Claim · model-written summary
If farmyard manure is too costly, farmers should opt for chemical fertilizer as an alternative for chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- opt for chemical fertilizer as an alternativee5
- Qualifier
- If the high cost of farmyard manure renders its use impracticablee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e5“If the high cost of farmyard manure renders its use impracticable, farmers can opt for chemical fertilizer as an alternative”
The same questions in other papers
other · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
27 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.