Paper · 2024 · Agricultural Water Management

Water–saving irrigation combined with N–loaded clinoptilolite enhances nutrient yield, and water productivity by improving rice root characteristics: A combined PCA–SEM analysis

Yang Sun; Qi Wu; Daocai Chi; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) –loaded clinoptilolite is renowned for its high–water retention and nutrient supplementation properties, which benefit crop growth. However, its combined effects with water–saving irrigation regime on N mineralization, root system characteristics, and nutrient yield, particularly their regulatory pathways, remain underexplored. This two–year split–plot experiment evaluated the impact of two irrigation regimes (I CF : continuous flooding irrigation; I AWD : alternate wet–dry irrigation) and two rates of N–loaded clinoptilolite (NZ 0 : no N–loaded clinoptilolite; NZ 10 : 10 t·ha –1 ) on root characteristics, mineralized N, nutrient yield, and water productivity. We employed principal component analysis (PCA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to analyze the interactions among the factors. The I AWD NZ 10 treatment showed the greatest water–saving potential, increasing the irrigated area by 0.29–fold compared to I CF NZ 0 . N–loaded clinoptilolite under I AWD increased root surface area by 12.6 %, average root diameter by 14.2 %, and root volume by 13.8 %. Additionally, I AWD increased mineralized N by 22.4 %, while N–loaded clinoptilolite further boosted it by 34.7 %. Root characteristics (r = 0.78) were crucial mediators in the effect of N–loaded clinoptilolite on protein (r = 0.64) and amylose nutritional yield (r = 0.68). Water usage influenced protein (r = -0.93) and amylose nutritional water productivity (r =-0.67) indirectly via chalky rice rate (r =0.90). In summary, integrating N–loaded clinoptilolite with the I AWD regime not only enhanced rice root characteristics and mineralized N but also led to substantial increases in nutrient yield and water productivity. These findings underscore the potential for N–loaded clinoptilolite to be adopted as a key component in sustainable agricultural practices, offering a pathway to optimize resource use, reduce environmental impact, and improve crop productivity in water–limited regions. • Root characteristics are the most direct factor affecting nutrient yield. • Chalky rice rate is the most direct factor affecting nutrient water productivity. • N–loaded clinoptilolite primarily positively affected nutrient yield. • Water usage mainly negatively affected nutrient water productivity. • N–loaded clinoptilolite indirectly boosted nutrient water productivity by enhancing mineralized N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined I AWD NZ 10 treatment increased irrigated area by 0.29-fold relative to I CF NZ 0.

Treatment
I AWD NZ 10e0
Outcome
irrigated areae0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
0.29–folde0
Comparator
I CF NZ 0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“The I AWD NZ 10 treatment showed the greatest water–saving potential, increasing the irrigated area by 0.29–fold compared to I CF NZ 0 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-loaded clinoptilolite under I AWD increased root surface area by 12.6 %.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
N–loaded clinoptilolite under I AWDe0
Outcome
root surface areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.6 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“N–loaded clinoptilolite under I AWD increased root surface area by 12.6 %, average root diameter by 14.2 %, and root volume by 13.8 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-loaded clinoptilolite under I AWD increased average root diameter by 14.2 %.

Treatment
N–loaded clinoptilolite under I AWDe0
Outcome
average root diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.2 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“N–loaded clinoptilolite under I AWD increased root surface area by 12.6 %, average root diameter by 14.2 %, and root volume by 13.8 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-loaded clinoptilolite under I AWD increased root volume by 13.8 %.

Treatment
N–loaded clinoptilolite under I AWDe0
Outcome
root volumee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.8 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“N–loaded clinoptilolite under I AWD increased root surface area by 12.6 %, average root diameter by 14.2 %, and root volume by 13.8 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I AWD increased mineralized N by 22.4 %.

Treatment
I AWDe0
Outcome
mineralized Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.4 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“I AWD increased mineralized N by 22.4 %, while N–loaded clinoptilolite further boosted it by 34.7 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-loaded clinoptilolite further increased mineralized N by 34.7 %.

Treatment
N–loaded clinoptilolitee0
Outcome
mineralized Ne0
Direction
boostede0
Value
34.7 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“I AWD increased mineralized N by 22.4 %, while N–loaded clinoptilolite further boosted it by 34.7 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1201 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root characteristics mediated the clinoptilolite effect on protein nutritional yield.

Treatment
N–loaded clinoptilolitee0
Outcome
proteine0
Value
r = 0.64e0
Qualifier
Root characteristicse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root characteristics (r = 0.78) were crucial mediators in the effect of N–loaded clinoptilolite on protein (r = 0.64) and amylose nutritional yield (r = 0.68).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1361 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root characteristics mediated the clinoptilolite effect on amylose nutritional yield.

Treatment
N–loaded clinoptilolitee0
Outcome
amylose nutritional yielde0
Value
r = 0.68e0
Qualifier
Root characteristicse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root characteristics (r = 0.78) were crucial mediators in the effect of N–loaded clinoptilolite on protein (r = 0.64) and amylose nutritional yield (r = 0.68).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1361 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water usage was negatively related to protein nutritional water productivity through chalky rice rate.

Treatment
Water usagee0
Outcome
proteine0
Value
r = -0.93e0
Qualifier
chalky rice ratee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water usage influenced protein (r = -0.93) and amylose nutritional water productivity (r =-0.67) indirectly via chalky rice rate (r =0.90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1501 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water usage was negatively related to amylose nutritional water productivity through chalky rice rate.

Treatment
Water usagee0
Outcome
amylose nutritional water productivitye0
Value
r =-0.67e0
Qualifier
chalky rice ratee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water usage influenced protein (r = -0.93) and amylose nutritional water productivity (r =-0.67) indirectly via chalky rice rate (r =0.90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

N-loaded clinoptilolite positively affected nutrient yield.

Treatment
N–loaded clinoptilolitee0
Outcome
nutrient yielde0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“N–loaded clinoptilolite primarily positively affected nutrient yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2215 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Water usage negatively affected nutrient water productivity.

Treatment
Water usagee0
Outcome
nutrient water productivitye0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water usage mainly negatively affected nutrient water productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2218–2285 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

N-loaded clinoptilolite indirectly boosted nutrient water productivity by enhancing mineralized N.

Treatment
N–loaded clinoptilolitee0
Outcome
nutrient water productivitye0
Direction
boostede0
Qualifier
mineralized Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“N–loaded clinoptilolite indirectly boosted nutrient water productivity by enhancing mineralized N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2288–2386 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.